Help shape the future of Box
Welcome to Box Pulse, our product feedback tool powered by UserVoice. Got an idea for how to improve Box? Share it with us and gather support or vote on other people's ideas. Your feedback is essential to informing roadmap decisions and shaping the future of our products. Thanks for joining our community!
See user guide here.
209 results found
-
Ability to update the "Learn More" Classification Link
Box customers would like the ability to update the “Learn more” URL to a customer specific Classification Policy URL.They want to add the URL to their own Data Classification Policy that users can access as a reference. The URL that the customer would like to add is specific to the Data Classification Policy and not intended for Help or support URL to contact. They would like users to be able to refer to the policy for more information. Specifically, replace the “Learn more” URL which has nothing to do with data classification (the URL is about Box community). The admins…
1 vote -
Box Shield Add-on for Splunk compatibllity with jquery 3.5
Will the 'Box Shield Add-on for Splunk' be updated to be compatible with jquery 3.5? Currently Splunk is running upgrade guidance that all apps should be and this seems to be an outlier. This is for version 1.1.1
1 vote -
Box Shield - Request to change pop-up message when requesting reason for invitation
The Box Shield function is configured to ask for the reason for the invitation when inviting external users.
I would like to see a change in the wording of the pop-up when asking for the reason for the invitation.[Current]
In conjunction with the pull-down display of the reason for the invitation.
"Remove one user instead and continue" will be displayed.[Change Requested]
Along with the display of the invitation reason pull-down.
"Remove the user who is preventing the invitation from being invited instead and continue" is displayed.~~Japanese~~
Box Shieldの機能により外部ユーザー招待時の招待理由を求める設定を行なっている。
招待理由を求める際のポップアップについて文言の変更を希望する。[現在]
招待理由のプルダウンの表示と合わせて、
"代わりに1名のユーザーを削除して続行する"と表示される[変更希望]
招待理由のプルダウンの表示と合わせて、
"代わりに招待の妨げとなっているユーザーを招待先から削除して続行する"と表示される1 vote -
Search document properties in Automated Classification
When exporting design files into PDFs, document properties are often saved alongside the files to designate the sensitivity - for instance, a document may be labeled "confidential".
If we could search for custom terms in these document properties, we could catch some of the classifications already going on.
1 vote -
Add additional details in the the virus detection notification email
During this time (2022/02/28, Monday, 13:00), I received a virus detection notification email.
When I checked the contents, the upload date by virus detection notification email is 2020/06/16 9:36:17 JST,
Neither the target file was found in the path of the email presentation.I contacted MKI Box Support Desk.
We received the following answers."The virus scan seems to be rescanned accordingly based on the activity of the file, not only at the time of upload.
The frequency of scans is determined by the number of file activity.
It can be difficult to explain the consistency of when this notification…1 vote -
Make classification labels visible without selection
Currently you must select a folder to see if it's classified. A customer of mine would prefer to see that a folder is classified without having to select it.
1 vote -
Import shield classification pattern values from a xls or doc
Ability to import custom terms from a xls - the ability to import any shield value (ex email domains) from a xls or doc is important because that is how they manage such lists with other applications
1 vote -
Only allow specific people to have access to the option to override Box Shield Classifications, rather than "everybody or nobody."
Only allow specific people to have access to the option to override Box Shield Classifications, rather than "everybody or nobody."
1 vote -
Send Box Shield notification(s) via text
Send Box Shield notification(s) via text.
Today, only available via Shield Dashboard or via email for Admin and/or co-Admin(s).
1 vote -
Automatically re-route content flagged by Box Shield Malware scan to a specific folder owned by IT/InfoSec/Admin
Automatically re-route content flagged by Box Shield Malware scan to a specific folder owned by IT/InfoSec/Admin. After the IT/InfoSec/Admin team approved the folder/file as safe, then release it back to its original location.
1 vote -
Smart Access: Allow move/copy even with download restriction
Download restriction restricts external users (editor permission) from moving content within folders they have access to. There should be an option to restrict download but also allow for moving and copying within folders that have the classification policy because to an end user, this is not a download function.
1 vote -
Shield access policy customization - inclusion/exclusion list for downloading files
Interested in an inclusion/exclusion list FOR downloading files, as part of a Shield access policy.
Ex: If Owners/Co-Owners/Editors are OK to download they want control the file types they can download. I know you can control this by just creating a separate classification and policy but that could cause too many of them. Better to create an filetype inclusion list
0 votes -
Priority of classification policies in combination with shield detection rules
Hi,
I can currently prioritize classification policies. Unfortunately, the classifications used in this way categorically overwrite those created with box shield's access policies.
For example: I have a classification only with shield access policies.. high confidential. This includes external collaboration restriction, download and print restriction.
It will be set manually on the desired folders. All files in this folder are now protected
Now i also have a classification with classification policies like credit card number or IBAN code. This should inform user automatically that there's a file with (maybe) protectable content.
This overwrites the classification which is manually set on…1 vote -
Shield Classification based on keywords or text terms
Shield auto-Classification on keywords or terms
1 vote -
Add Smart Access Security Control to cap external user permissions
Add the ability to cap external access. Example; restrict external users to Viewer/Uploader rights or below; or Viewer and below (e.g. Read Only).
1 vote -
Option for Shared Link Restriction on new links only
We would like the option to apply the shared link restriction to "new links only" so that current links are not overwritten. This would be similar to the External Collaboration Restriction option to apply to "only new external collaborations"
1 voteNot on the roadmap for FY25, will evaluate for FY26
-
Auto Classification Based Off Uploader
Automatically classify content based off uploader of document. Use case: anything a legal team member uploads should automatically be classified as confidential
1 vote -
Limit the rights of users who can change classification labels.
■Background
We are currently using Box Shield to control the public scope of shared links.
Currently, co-owners would still be able to use the classification labels even if they are set to "Owners/co owners" in the below settings.We want to make sure that only the owner can set classification labels.
■Details
Classification labels can be configured with "Admin console>Classification".
When the Box administrator clicks on Settings, the following settings are available：
Classification settings
Only allow selected permission types to modify classifications on content.
See collaboration permission chart.
Link：https://support.box.com/hc/en-us/articles/360044196413・Owners/co owners
・Owners/co owners and editors
・Owners/co owners, editors, and…1 vote -
PCI Compliance
As a user in an industry which must be PCI compliant,
I want content flagged by Shield as containing PCI content to not be included in the full-text search index,
So that our Box environment can be PCI compliant without having to disable full text search for the entire environment.1 vote -
Device Pinning as a condition for "Download Restriction"
Wondering if "device pinning" can register details of devices utilized by the user and allows/disallow the login from it. Why cant it be used as a condition under "Download Restriction". MDM solutions are not yet fully matured to cover all & frequently changing devices types .
1 voteDynamic Device Trust as a condition for Download restriction is on the roadmap.
- Don't see your idea?