Skip to content

Help shape the future of Box

Welcome to Box Pulse, our product feedback tool powered by UserVoice. Got an idea for how to improve Box? Share it with us and gather support or vote on other people's ideas. Your feedback is essential to informing roadmap decisions and shaping the future of our products. Thanks for joining our community!

See user guide here.

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback

261 results found

  1. Allows the report to see the classification labels that have been applied in the past

    In the User Activity Report, when a classification label is changed, it is logged. However, it does not record from which label was changed to which label..
    One user currently sets the privilege to edit classification labels to editors (general employees). However, the more users with editing privileges, the greater the security risk. The only way to avoid this risk is to limit the scope of editing privileges to the owner or co-owner (superior). In that case, it would be too inconvenient, since it would be necessary to apply to the superior for a change in the classification label.
    By…

    23 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Shield  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  2. Viewer uploader Role is restricted of downloading classified documents

    Currently, users with the Viewer Uploader role are restricted from downloading classified content when Box Shield is enabled.
    Promotion to Editor role is unwanted as it might lead to data deletion and editing.
    can we allow this feature so we can keep enforcing the policy?
    at the time being we can only allow owners, co-owners and Editor to do so. see attached

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Shield  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. Suspicious Location Shield Alert

    Allow for tagging Safe Locations against particular users, rather than having to exclude a user from alerts all together. Example; Offshore support in a country like India, where this shouldn't be treated as a suspicious location for this particular user, even though the rest of the organisation is based in Australia

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Shield  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  4. Request for Specification Update: Ensuring Classification Label Overwrite Upon Folder Relocation

    When a folder that has classification labels assigned is moved into another folder governed by a classification policy with the 'Overwrite existing classification labels' option enabled, the labels are not being overwritten as expected. We kindly request that the system behavior be revised so that the existing labels are properly overwritten in accordance with the policy settings.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Shield  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  5. Feature request to be able to set the "Integration Restrictions" setting in Enterprise settings

    I'd like to see the "Integration Download Limit" from the Enterprise Settings enforced tenant-wide. And I want it to apply to all content.
    We would like to request the ability to set the "Integration Restrictions" setting from the Enterprise settings to the entire tenant.
    Currently, in order to specify "Content download restriction on integrations", it must be applied every time a folder is created in the first level, and only restrictable content is applied.
    I'd like to see the "Integration Restrictions" setting from Enterprise Settings enforced tenant-wide. And I want it to apply to all content.

    【In Japanese】
    <タイトル>
    「統合の制限」の設定をEnterprise設定にて設定できる機能要望…

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Shield  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  6. Unable to navigate between shield alerts easily

    When wishing to browse through Shield Alerts, it is only possible by changing the alert ID number in the http://company.app.box.com/master/shield/alerts/nnnn

    There should be a First, Previous, Next and Last option to scroll through those Alerts (any rule type) that are currently listed

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Shield  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  7. Dashboard table of results should have additional columns available to display

    In addition to the existing columns, there should also be available:
    Target user ID
    Data Residency Zone (related to Target user ID)

    number of anomalous downloads (for Anomalous Download rule type only)

    gigabytes total anomalous downloads (for Anomalous Download rule type only)

    All columns (apart from Alert ID) should be available to hide/display (via settings table)

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Shield  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  8. Enhanced column functionality - sorting, width, display/hide, order and word-wrap

    All columns shown in the table of results on Shield Dashboard should be:
    - sortable
    - hidden / displayed
    - content word wrapped
    - adjust column widths

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Shield  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  9. Provide a 'Clear all' filters button

    With enhanced numbers of filters to choose from, the dashboard requires a 'Clear all' filters button

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Shield  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  10. Enable a download to csv of the current list of alert details displayed

    There is currently no suitable way of saving the viewed alert list to csv/excel. The only way I have found to do this is to highlight the range of rows, copy to clipboard, then paste to excel. HOWEVER this exports content to a SINGLE column - I've then had to create special formulae to extract the data to additional columns - ie Created, Rule name, rule type, target user etc

    The download button should export the current list (all selected - ignoring pages) to a csv with all the displayed columns

    The download should have ADDITIONAL columns (populated only for…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Shield  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  11. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Shield  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  12. Box Shield should save last used filters

    When closing Box Shield, it should retain details of the filters last used, so that when Box Shield is relaunched (or dashboard if selected), the dashboard displays only the content according to the filters last chosen. Without having a First, Next, Previous, Last option to scroll through the alerts, it is annoying having to RESELECT the preferred filters

    For example, some Co-Admins may only be interested in anomalous downloads, and always wishing to view those for the last 30 days.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Shield  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  13. Please display the [Justification] in its entirety.

    When users select a [Justification], only the first approximately 20 characters are shown, and the rest are truncated.
    While users can hover over the truncated text to view the full [Justification] during selection, they cannot view the entire text after making a selection. Consequently, if multiple [Justifications] begin with the same text, users may not realize they have made an incorrect selection. Please ensure that the full [Justification] is displayed.

    *This refers to cases where a Business [Justification] is specified to allow a one-time exception to Shield’s access policies. For example, even when external invitations are restricted, selecting a [Justification]…

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Shield  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  14. Expaned Classification Policy Scale and Functionality

    A large enterprise customer is currently evaluating the effectiveness of Box's classification policies and need to audit their configurations to ensure they align with intended design and behavior. However, given current UI constraints that only show up to 100 folders listed under a classification policy (even though there are ~600 items under the policy), the only way to view or verify policy construction is to delete and rebuild these policies. Additionally, they noted the lack of ability to scope policies by user account or even root folders is a major hinderance in their testing and overall scalability of the solution.…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Shield  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  15. Expand Classification Policy functionality and scale

    A large enterprise is currently evaluating the effectiveness of Box's classification policies and need to audit their configurations to ensure they align with intended design and behavior. However, given current UI constraints of a Classification Policy only able to show up to 100 items (even though the current testing has ~600 items under a policy), the only way to view or verify policy construction is to delete and rebuild these policies. Additionally, they noted the lack of ability to scope policies by user account or even root folders is a major hinderance in their testing and overall scalability of the…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Shield  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  16. Shield Dashboard Enhancement Request - View detailed reports directly from dashboard graphs

    The Shield dashboard shows three different graphs about detected alerts, but in order to get the details, we have to output a separate user activity report.
    Since we want to see problems immediately on the spot, we would like to see improvements that would allow us to quickly see the details of alerts without having to leave the dashboard UI, such as being able to click on a graph to be taken to a page with more detailed information.

    Shieldダッシュボードには、検出されたアラートに関する3種類のグラフが表示されていますが、その詳細を取得するためには、別途ユーザーアクティビティレポートを出力しなければなりません。
    問題があった場合はその場ですぐ確認したいので、ダッシュボードのUIから離れることなく、グラフをクリックすれば詳細情報が表示されるページに遷移するなど、クイックにアラートの詳細が確認できるような改善を希望します。

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Shield  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  17. folder-setting to restrict who can classify content.

    Want more granular control over who can apply classification labels — specifically:

    Restrict end users from applying classifications to content that is shared via public/shared links.

    Allow only folder owners or admins to apply classifications in those scenarios.

    Still allow end users to apply restrictive/internal-only classifications to content that is not publicly shared (i.e., stays within the organization).

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Shield  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  18. Ability to identify password protected files(パスワード付きファイルを特定する機能)

    If a file is password protected, Box Shield's deep scan cannot be performed.
    We would like to see a feature added to Box Shield to identify files with passwords.

    (和訳)
    ファイルにパスワードが掛かっていると、Box Shieldのディープスキャンが実行できません。
    パスワード付きファイルを特定するためにBox Shieldに、パスワード付きファイルを特定する機能の追加を希望します。

    4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Shield  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  19. We would like to actively monitor the status of Box Shield and the Shield settings applied to our enterprise and environments.

    We would like to actively monitor the status of Box Shield and the Shield settings applied to our enterprise and environments.

    Doing so will provide the assurance needed that Box Shield is protecting us from threats, and mean we do not need to layer on our own file scanning as a backup.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Shield  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  20. auto classification policies/engine to apply scanning of files within a compressed file

    Extend auto classification policies to compressed files (content within the zip) as well and have shield policies be able to enforce rules established for certain classifications. If something inside the unprotected compressed file is detected according to the auto classification policies, apply the same classification to the compressed file so the shield policies are adhered to.

    Without this, shield policies can be bypassed by simply zipping a file that would have triggered shield policy as the scan doesn't currently scan files within the compressed file.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Shield  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  • Don't see your idea?