Help shape the future of Box
Welcome to Box Pulse, our product feedback tool powered by UserVoice. Got an idea for how to improve Box? Share it with us and gather support or vote on other people's ideas. Your feedback is essential to informing roadmap decisions and shaping the future of our products. Thanks for joining our community!
See user guide here.
263 results found
-
I would need for compliance issues to restrict specific user download and print permission while letting them to edit the files within BOX
I would need for compliance issues to restrict specific user download and print permission while letting them to edit the files within BOX
1 vote -
Ethical Walls - enhancement to Information Barriers for neutral site scenarios
Make information barriers work in neutral site scenarios. Where Group A and Group B can't collaborate each other, But if Group C invites Group A and Group B into their folder, the two groups can collaborate in the same space.
1 vote -
Screen shot blocking
Have Box, through its security mechanism, prevent screenshots from occurring on content that is sensitive, in addition to watermarking that content.
1 vote -
Feature Request: Flexible External Sharing Controls with Combined Allow/Block Logic (Box Shield)
Current Situation (As-Is)
Box Shield does not support applying multiple external collaboration restrictions on the same content.
As a result:When a folder is classified with an allow-list policy, sharing externally is restricted only to explicitly approved email addresses managed in shield list.
This overrides the broader domain-based sharing rules, preventing sharing with otherwise permitted external domain.Example impact:
A folder with classification cannot be shared with regular external users from allowed domains, unless they are explicitly included in the allow list.
Current workaround:
Admins must manually maintain allow-lists (emails) for the classified folder.
Problem
Lack of flexibility in combining…
1 vote -
Setting to allow classification additions/increases but not deletions/decreases
Box Shields allows you to disable classification modifications for everyone except admins, but this is too restrictive. What we're looking for:
- Allow classification labels to be ranked by sensitivity
- Add configuration setting to allow Editors to add/increase sensitivity but not be able to delete/decrease sensitivity.
Without this, we're finding we have to choose between diffusing accountability of classification labels vs. administrative overhead of having an admin or owner manage all classification label additions.
1 vote -
I want to define multiple AI classification policies.
Only one AI classification policy can be defined in "Classification Policy". Since the policies that I want to apply to each folder are different, I want to be able to define multiple AI classification policies.
[In Japanese]
「分類ポリシー」に、AI分類ポリシーを一つしか定義できない。フォルダごとに適用したいポリシーが異なる為、複数のAI分類ポリシーを定義できるようにしたい。5 votes -
Show the date the classification label was applied for items uploaded by external users.
件名：外部ユーザーがアップロードしたアイテムに対して、分類ラベルが適用された日付を表示する
Regardless of whether the user checking the date the classification label was applied has the appropriate permissions, if the user who uploaded the item is an external user, the date the classification label was applied is not displayed.
It is inconvenient that this cannot be confirmed from the Box UI.
While it is possible to check the classification label application date in the User Activity Report, doing so requires an administrator or co-admin and can take time.
Please make the date the classification label was applied visible on the item details page for the relevant item.訳：
分類ラベルが適用された日を確認するユーザが適切な権限を付与されているか否かにかかわらず、アイテムをアップロードしたユーザが外部ユーザの場合、分類ラベルが適用された日付が表示されません。
Boxの画面で確認することができないのは不便です。…4 votes -
Provide watch list for anomalous downloads
I would like shield to have a watch list of people they know are going to leave the company within the next 30 days. I want to be able to tell if someone on that list starts downloading a large number of files during that 30-day window so they can immediately cut off their access.
2 votes -
Security Control - Download and Print Restriction, possibility for Owners/Co-owners and Editors exceptions
Security Control - Download and Print Restriction, possibility for Owners/Co-owners and Editors to be excluded from this restriction.
Currently, for managed users it's possible to restrict all users except Owners/Co-owners and Editors.
It would be beneficial to have a similar option for restricting external users1 vote -
Access Policy to Restrict Access to Specified Groups
With Hubs, users' ability to add content to a Hub increases the chance of accidentally giving access to unintended internal users. For sensitive content, it would be nice to be able to have an access policy applied to specific classification that restricts document access to users in specific groups to prevent internal data leakage.
1 vote -
Shield alerting admins when users "download" from Box Drive
A customer is reporting difficulty using Box Shield’s Anomalous Download detection due to how downloads are currently defined when Box Drive is in use. Box Shield flags a “download” whenever a user expands or opens a folder in Box Drive. As a result, routine navigation actions are recorded as downloads, creating noise in the anomaly signals. The customer is asking whether anomalous download detection can be refined to trigger only on intentional file downloads (e.g., explicit download actions), rather than folder expansion or passive access via Box Drive.
1 vote -
Shield - Malicious Content alerting should provide greater details
Malicious Content alerts within Shield should provide more information on why a file is considered "malicious", to aid the process of sandboxing and investigation (such as threat type, family etc).
15 votes -
Shield - Download and Navigate to a file directly from a Malicious Content Shield Alert
For the Malicious Content rule, it should be possible to download a malicious file directly from a Shield Alert for sandboxing without having to search for it.
Also, an admin who has Content Manager access should be able to click a button within the alert and navigate to the file in the Content Manager to manage it.
3 votes -
Create a Hub Restriction for Box Shield
Add the ability to apply a Hub restriction (e.g., prevent content from being added to a Hub) in Shield. Users would be able to apply the Hub restriction within an access policy based on a classification label or content type. This would prevent unintentional internal and external access to content in a Hub and reduce confusion for external users that may be blocked from accessing content in a Hub due to other Shield external collaboration restrictions. This would be especially helpful for highly regulated industries like public sector agencies, government contractors, and financial services.
1 vote -
Set up abnormal download threat detection for a specific folder
The threat detection feature for abnormal downloads applies to the entire Box and often results in unnecessary detections.
If threat detection can be focused on specific folders, unintended detections can be minimized.
I would like the threat detection feature for abnormal downloads to be usable by specifying folders.-in Japanese-
異常なダウンロードに対する脅威検出機能は、Box全体が対象となっており不要な検出をしてしまうことが多いです。特定のフォルダに絞って脅威検出ができれば、意図しない検出を抑えることができます。異常なダウンロードに対する脅威検出機能をフォルダを指定して使えるようにしてほしい。2 votes -
CrowdStrike's ability to filter device protection by IP address
Box Shield allows you to protect your devices with CrowdStrike.
Once CrowdStrike is enabled, you will not be able to log in on devices that do not have Box Tools installed.
Therefore, if you have a device that cannot be installed on Box Tools, such as Linux, you will not be able to use CrowdStrike's protection of your device.
Only when calling from a specific IP address should CrowdStrike policies be applied.
There is a need to not want the policy to be applied to unmanaged devices, so we would like a function that allows us to narrow down the…2 votes -
In Box Shield, there is a case where it is not possible to mark a file as safe.
Currently, when the “Malicious Content” setting in Box Shield is disabled in the owner’s tenant but enabled in the tenant of the user performing the action, if content is detected as malicious, the detected file does not appear on the owner’s dashboard and cannot be marked as safe. As a result, the corresponding alert cannot be cleared, which leads to a situation where the file cannot be used in Box. If the file needs to be used, it must be exchanged outside of Box. We would like to request a feature enhancement to address this.
現状、所有者側のテナントでBox Shieldの「悪意のあるコンテンツ」を無効化しており、操作を行ったユーザーが所属しているテナントが「悪意のあるコンテンツ」を有効化しているときに悪意のあるコンテンツとして検知されると所有者側のダッシュボードには検知されたファイルが表示されず、安全なファイルとしてマークすることができない。
それにより、該当アラートを削除することができないため、該当ファイルをBoxにて使用することができない状況が発生する。
対象ファイルを使用したい場合、Box以外の場所でやり取りを行う必要が発生してしまうため、機能改善を要望する。1 vote -
Add Integration by App ID/Client ID for Shield Access Policy Integration Restriction
When creating a Security Rule for a Shield Access Policy, when setting an Integration Restriction, you can only add the integration by name, and not by client ID or app ID. We have many apps with similar names, so using the client ID or app ID would help us restrict the correct app.
1 vote -
AI restriction in shield access policy
Shield Access Policy Settings to include the possibility to restrict the use of AI on content. That would prevent using AI on files containing PII, or other files including sensitive content in particular when using Box AI in Box Hubs.
18 votes -
pop-up the warning information and provide the override windows when sending the invitation
Box Shield/Access policy , when choose the option -- provide the justification to External Collaboration Restriction Settings
Expected:
pop-up the warning information and provide the override windows when sending the invitation1 vote
- Don't see your idea?