Help shape the future of Box
Welcome to Box Pulse, our product feedback tool powered by UserVoice. Got an idea for how to improve Box? Share it with us and gather support or vote on other people's ideas. Your feedback is essential to informing roadmap decisions and shaping the future of our products. Thanks for joining our community!
See user guide here.
- or
9874 results found
-
Request for a Report Listing Groups and Their Members
The [Group] report has been released, and it is now more convenient since we can check the list of groups.
However, it would be even more useful for inventory/cleanup purposes if we could see a list of the members belonging to each group.
We are currently recording group member lists manually, so we are looking forward to the release of a feature that allows us to export both the list of groups and their members all at once in a report.
[グループ] レポートがリリースされ、グループの一覧が確認できて便利になりました。
ですが、実際に各グループに所属しているメンバーの一覧が確認できるともっと棚卸に活用しやすいです。
レポートでグループ一覧及びその所属メンバーが一括で出力できる機能のリリースをお待ちしています。
現在は手作業でグループのメンバー一覧を記録しているため、レポートでグループ一覧及びその所属メンバーが一括で出力できる機能のリリースをお待ちしています。8 votes -
Function to disable the display of the login authentication screen for Box for Microsoft Office co-editing features on a per-user basis.
The following is a request regarding the seamless login feature.
https://support.box.com/hc/ja/articles/44224534926355To avoid displaying the login authentication screen, we understand that enabling the co-editing feature for only certain users in the tenant settings will resolve the issue.
However, if the number of users enabling or disabling the co-editing feature increases, managing user and group additions or removals through tenant settings each time becomes extremely cumbersome and impractical.
Implementing this feature enables end users to handle issues immediately on their own, reducing the burden on administrators.下記シームレスログイン機能に関する要望です。
https://support.box.com/hc/ja/articles/44224534926355ログイン認証画面を表示させないためには、テナント設定で一部のユーザーにのみ共同編集機能を有効にすれば回避できると認識しています。
但し、共同編集機能を有効/無効にするユーザーが増えたりした場合に都度テナント設定からの制限ではユーザーやグループの出し入れ等の操作が非常に手間となり現実的ではありません。
本機能を実装することでエンドユーザー自身で即時に対応できるようになり管理者の負担を減らすことができます。20 votes -
Enable Box AI API for Specific Users or Groups
Currently, the Box AI API can only be enabled or disabled for "all users" at once. To allow custom applications to use Box AI, we have to enable the API for every user in our tenant.
However, it is difficult to estimate how many additional API Units we need to purchase, since we cannot predict how much each user will use the Box AI API. We are also concerned about users utilizing the AI API without proper authorization or oversight.
Just like Box AI for Notes and Box AI for Hubs, we would like to be able to enable or disable the Box AI API for specific users or groups. This would allow us to manage access more flexibly and securely. We would appreciate your consideration of this feature.
〈特定のユーザーまたはグループに対してBox AI APIを有効にする〉
現在、Box AI APIは「すべてのユーザー」に対して一括で有効／無効を設定する仕様になっています。そのため、カスタムアプリでBox AIを利用できるようにしたい場合、全ユーザーに対してAI APIを有効化する必要があります。しかし、どのユーザーがどれくらいBox AI APIを利用するか事前に把握できず、API Unitの追加購入がどれほど必要か判断できません。また、意図しないユーザーが勝手にBox AI APIを利用してしまうリスクもあります。
Box AI for NotesやBox AI for Hubsのように、Box AI APIも特定のユーザーやグループ単位で有効化／無効化できるようにしていただきたいです。
Currently, the Box AI API can only be enabled or disabled for "all users" at once. To allow custom applications to use Box AI, we have to enable the API for every user in our tenant.
However, it is difficult to estimate how many additional API Units we need to purchase, since we cannot predict how much each user will use the Box AI API. We are also concerned about users utilizing the AI API without proper authorization or oversight.
Just like Box AI for Notes and Box AI for Hubs, we would like to be able to enable or…
18 votes -
Enhance Metadata Input Fields in Box Forms (Multi-line Support & Character Limit)
[Background and Problem]
A customer is looking to migrate their FAQ management system from Microsoft Lists to Box. Their plan is to store the FAQ answers as metadata. However, we have received feedback that this is impractical because the metadata input field in Box Forms is restricted to a single line, making it difficult to enter long answers.Below are our feature improvement requests.
Multi-line Input Support
We request the ability to either adjust the height of the text input field for metadata, or to select the same format as the "Long Text" field for metadata fields.Increased Character Limit (Optional)
We also have a comment from the customer regarding the character limit for the metadata field in Forms:
"While 400 characters for Japanese is sufficient for basic needs, it would be even better if it were expanded to around 1,000 characters to allow for more detailed information and broaden its use."
＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝
【背景と課題】
現在、Microsoft ListsでFAQ管理を行っている顧客がBoxへの移行を検討しています。 この際、FAQの回答をメタデータに格納する計画ですが、Box Formsのメタデータ入力欄が単一行であるため、「これでは長文の回答が入力できず、実用的ではない」というフィードバックを受けました。以下、機能改善のリクエストです。
入力フィールドの複数行化
メタデータ用のテキスト入力フィールドの高さを調整できる、または「ロングテキスト」フィールドと同じ形式をメタデータフィールドでも選択できるようにしてほしい。入力文字数の拡張 ※オプショナル
Formsのメタデータフィールドに入力できる文字数に関しても、顧客からコメントをいただいております。
「日本語で400文字あれば最低限の用途では問題ないが、より詳細な情報を記述できるよう、1000文字程度まで拡張されると活用の幅が広がり、さらに良い」
[Background and Problem]
A customer is looking to migrate their FAQ management system from Microsoft Lists to Box. Their plan is to store the FAQ answers as metadata. However, we have received feedback that this is impractical because the metadata input field in Box Forms is restricted to a single line, making it difficult to enter long answers.Below are our feature improvement requests.
Multi-line Input Support
We request the ability to either adjust the height of the text input field for metadata, or to select the same format as the "Long Text" field for metadata fields.Increased Character Limit…
21 votes -
Can we get the ability to set which agent is the default agent per hub?
It would be great if we could set which agent is the default for each hub. If left blank, then the default Box agent is selected. If we have an agent for each hub, our users may forget to switch the agent as they switch between hubs.
21 votes -
AI chat history should be saved
Any AI chat history, whether on a document(s) or in a Hub, is not saved in the same way other AI platforms do (ex, ChatGPT, Google Gemini, CoPilot, Perplexity, etc.). Retaining the chat history will improve efficiency in future conversations and improve personalization. This seems to be the biggest flaw/miss in the rollout of Box AI.
25 votes -
Ability to filter fields within a table
It would be helpful to be able to filter tables created in boxnote to eliminate noise and avoid having to utilize spreadsheets.
7 votes -
Date and TimeStamp - Box Sign
Add date and timestamp on the signature field is currently and enterprise setting. The user would like for this to be user facing, instead of enterprise wide. So that individual users could choose to toggle on or off. Or specific users and groups
5 votes -
Export Metadata from Apps Views
Export Metadata from Apps Views to CSV, XLSX, PDF
39 votes -
Enable branching from any point in a previous Box AI Home conversation
▼What problem could Box solve for you?
Box AI Home provides session history and allows users to view and resume previous sessions. However, when users revisit a past conversation, they need the ability to branch from a specific point in the conversation and ask a new follow-up question without overwriting or altering the original conversation flow.Today, users may have long-running Box AI conversations involving multiple files, folders, or Hubs as sources. In many business scenarios, a user may want to go back to an earlier answer or question and explore a different direction from that exact point. For example, after asking Box AI to analyze a set of documents, the user may later realize that they want to ask a different follow-up question based on the third answer in the conversation rather than continuing from the latest answer.
▼Requested enhancement
Please add a feature in Box AI Home that allows users to:- Open a previous session from session history.
- Select any prior message or response in that conversation.
- Start a new question from that point.
- Automatically create a new branched conversation or new session, while preserving the original conversation unchanged.
- Clearly show that the new session was branched from the original session, ideally with a reference back to the source session and the selected branch point.
▼Business impact / use case
This would improve productivity for users who conduct complex document analysis, legal review, policy review, research, proposal creation, or multi-document summarization using Box AI Home. Users would be able to explore multiple analytical paths without losing the original conversation context.This is especially important for enterprise use cases where AI conversations are used iteratively. Without branching, users must either continue from the latest point, manually recreate context, or start from scratch. This creates unnecessary friction and increases the risk of inconsistent analysis.
▼Expected outcome
Users can safely explore different lines of questioning from earlier points in a Box AI Home conversation, while keeping the original session intact. This would make Box AI Home more useful as a persistent, auditable workspace for enterprise AI workflows.
Box AI Homeの過去の会話において、任意の箇所から分岐して新しい質問を開始できるようにしてほしい
▼Boxに解決してほしい課題
Box AI Homeでは、セッション履歴から以前のセッションを表示・再開できます。一方で、過去の会話を参照した際に、会話の最後から再開するだけでなく、会話の途中にある任意の質問・回答の時点に戻り、そこから新しい質問を行って別の会話として分岐できる機能が必要です。Box AI Homeでは、複数のファイル、フォルダ、Hubをソースとして、長い会話を通じて分析や要約を行うケースがあります。そのような場合、後から「この時点の回答を起点に別の観点で質問したい」「最新の回答からではなく、途中の回答から別ルートで検討したい」といったニーズが発生します。
▼要望内容
Box AI Homeに以下の機能を追加してほしいです。1.セッション履歴から過去の会話を開く。
2.過去会話内の任意の質問または回答を選択する。
3.その時点を起点として新しい質問を開始する。
4.元の会話を変更・上書きせず、新しい分岐会話または新しいセッションとして保存する。
5.分岐元のセッションおよび分岐した位置が分かるように表示する。▼業務上の効果・ユースケース
この機能により、Box AI Homeを利用した複雑な文書分析、法務レビュー、規程確認、調査、提案書作成、複数文書の要約といった業務の生産性が向上します。現状では、過去の会話の途中から別の検討を行いたい場合でも、最新の会話末尾から続けるか、手動で文脈を再作成するか、新しいセッションを最初から作成する必要があります。これは作業効率を下げるだけでなく、分析の一貫性を損なう可能性があります。
▼期待される結果
ユーザーは、元の会話を保持したまま、過去の任意の会話ポイントから安全に別の質問・分析ルートを開始できるようになります。これにより、Box AI HomeはエンタープライズAI業務における、より実用的で継続性のあるワークスペースになります。▼What problem could Box solve for you?
Box AI Home provides session history and allows users to view and resume previous sessions. However, when users revisit a past conversation, they need the ability to branch from a specific point in the conversation and ask a new follow-up question without overwriting or altering the original conversation flow.Today, users may have long-running Box AI conversations involving multiple files, folders, or Hubs as sources. In many business scenarios, a user may want to go back to an earlier answer or question and explore a different direction from that exact point. For example,…
4 votes -
Enable selecting files stored in Box directly in File Requests
Currently, file request links only allow you to upload files from local folders.
This is convenient if you use Box Drive, but users who rely solely on the browser have to download files from Box and then re-upload them via the file request link.I would like the file selection for file requests to allow choosing not only folders on the PC, but also files already stored in Box directly from the browser interface.
〈ファイルリクエストでBox内ファイルを直接選択可能にしたい〉
現在、ファイルリクエストリンクでは、ローカルフォルダ内のファイルしかアップロードできません。
Box Drive を利用している場合は便利ですが、ブラウザのみを利用するユーザーは、いったん Box からファイルをダウンロードしてから、ファイルリクエストリンクへ再度アップロードする必要があります。ファイルリクエストでアップロードするファイルの選択時に、PC上のフォルダだけでなく、ブラウザ画面から Box 内に保存されているファイルも直接選べるようにしてほしいです。
13 votes -
Signer to add fields to the signature request additionally to those added by sender
When using BoxSign, there are many cases where the requester will add additional fields.
In such a situation, there are times when signers themselves would like to add new fields, but they are unable to do so, and many voices are voicing concerns about the lack of convenience across the company.
We would like to request the implementation of this feature to improve convenience.BoxSignを使用する際に署名リクエスト者がフィールドを追加するケースが多々あります。
その状況下で署名者自身でも新たなフィールドを追加したい時がありますが、追加することできず社内全体で利便性に欠けている声が多く上がっています。
利便性向上のため本機能の実装をお願いしたいです。18 votes -
test flow
testing flow
1 vote -
Reverse Image Search
Being able to upload an image and Box browser finding it (or similar) within a specified folder. Similar idea to Google lens.
66 votes -
Box Automate: Support for “Form Metadata Template”
When a large number of metadata fields are captured via Forms, mapping each variable to metadata fields within the workflow becomes time-consuming and complex.
It would be highly beneficial to support applying metadata to files using a “Form Metadata Template,” similar to Relay, to simplify workflow creation.
formsで入力するメタデータフィールドが多い場合、ワークフロー内でフォームで取得した変数をメタデータフィールドにマッピングするのに手間がかかってしまいます。
Relayと同様に「Formメタデータテンプレート」を使ってファイルにメタデータを付ける操作もサポートしてほしい。4 votes -
I'd like the trash bin status to be reverted to the previous specification.
Regarding the BOX trash bin, since around August 12, 2025, all files appear to have the "10 years" policy applied to the trash bin, so I would like you to restore it to the previous state.
Please refer to the attached image for the previous state.12 votes -
Support CrowdStrike integration to GovCloud
Support CrowdStrike integration to GovCloud. Currently the integration with CrowdStrike Falcon only supports the commercial tenant of CrowdStrike and cannot interface with our GovCloud environment.
9 votes -
More visibility of 'find and replace' feature
Regarding the search and replace function in Box Note— beyond displaying it with Ctrl+F, are there any plans to make it more accessible, such as adding it to the three-dot menu (⋯) or another more visible location?
The end users will find the feature and utilize it if they are not so familiar with shotcuts operation.3 votes -
Limit the amount of data a user can delete
There have been repeated incidents where users accidentally delete large amounts of data from Box Drive. Each time, administrators are required to restore the data.
However, administrators cannot restore the data until the deletion process is fully completed, and even then, the restoration takes as much time as the deletion, which disrupts business operations.We would like to set an upper limit on the amount of data that users (other than Box administrators and co-administrators) can delete at one time, in order to prevent users from accidentally deleting large amounts of data.
〈ユーザーが削除できるデータ容量を制限する〉
Box Driveでユーザーが誤って大量のデータを削除してしまう事件が繰り返し発生しています。そのたびに管理者がデータを復元する必要があります。しかし、管理者は削除処理が完全に終了するまでデータを復元することができず、さらに復元にも削除と同じくらいの時間がかかるため、業務の妨げとなっています。ユーザー（Box管理者および共同管理者以外）が一度に削除できるデータ容量の上限を設定することで、ユーザーが誤って大量のデータを削除してしまうことを防ぎたいと考えています。
30 votes -
New shortcuts to AI in Box Notes
A new shortcut for Box AI for Box Notes has been released to display the AI prompt field when you enter a space at the beginning of a line in Box Notes.
https://support.box.com/hc/en-us/articles/42854740437011-New-shortcuts-to-AI-in-Box-Notes
I often type a space at the beginning of a line to lower a paragraph, and I had to clear the AI prompt field each time.
It is a small thing, but it is troublesome, so I would like you to change the specification.
Idea 1: Add configuration items to disable shortcuts in the admin console, registry, etc.
Idea 2: Change the shortcut to something else instead of a blank (e.g. Ctl- blank)A new shortcut for Box AI for Box Notes has been released to display the AI prompt field when you enter a space at the beginning of a line in Box Notes.
https://support.box.com/hc/en-us/articles/42854740437011-New-shortcuts-to-AI-in-Box-Notes
I often type a space at the beginning of a line to lower a paragraph, and I had to clear the AI prompt field each time.
It is a small thing, but it is troublesome, so I would like you to change the specification.
Idea 1: Add configuration items to disable shortcuts in the admin console, registry, etc.
Idea 2: Change the shortcut to something else instead…21 votes
- Don't see your idea?