Help shape the future of Box
Welcome to Box Pulse, our product feedback tool powered by UserVoice. Got an idea for how to improve Box? Share it with us and gather support or vote on other people's ideas. Your feedback is essential to informing roadmap decisions and shaping the future of our products. Thanks for joining our community!
See user guide here.
9874 results found
-
For Anonymous users hide names of Create by and Modified By on Box Web
Due to PII concerns please hide the names of created by or modified by when a anonymous user visits the Box Web App and is browsing content or previewing content.
1 vote -
Request for Hubs Version History Feature
Customer Pain Point & Concern:
Our customer is highly concerned about the risk of editors accidentally deleting or overwriting pages or sections within Hubs. Currently, there is no built-in version control or version history feature for Hubs (similar to what is available in Box Notes). As a workaround to prepare a backup plan, they are currently forced to take manual, regular backups by copying content, which has proven to be extremely tedious and inefficient.Requested Feature:
Version History for Hubs: A feature similar to Box Notes that allows users to view, restore, and revert to older versions of Hubs pages…
2 votes -
Leveraging AI for administrative tasks
I’d like to leverage AI to handle administrative tasks, such as identifying users who are barely using Box and removing them if they do not need a license. Right now, I can run a report, but it would be helpful if I could ask AI to show me all low-volume users. I’d also like to be able to look at high-volume users and activity that may indicate something beyond just doing their job.
1 vote -
Manual start trigger in a box app
I want to be able to select a set of records or files in a view and manually start a workflow on them from within a Box app. Right now, manual start is not available in Box apps.
2 votes -
Provide watch list for anomalous downloads
I would like shield to have a watch list of people they know are going to leave the company within the next 30 days. I want to be able to tell if someone on that list starts downloading a large number of files during that 30-day window so they can immediately cut off their access.
2 votes -
test from community
test from community
1 vote -
test flow
testing flow
1 vote -
We want to apply classification labels using Automate without granting Editors permission to change labels
In Relay, we had a workflow where users would manually trigger a workflow, assign an approval task, and upon approval, automatically change or assign a classification label. This was done to assign a label indicating that the content is ready for public release, enabling external sharing.
However, this cannot be achieved with Automate workflows. Upon checking the specifications, we found that unless the Admin Console allows Editors to modify classification labels, Automate workflows cannot assign labels. In our organization, we have only permitted Co-owners and Owners to change labels. If we allow Editors to change labels, general employees would be…
5 votes -
Dynamic approving
Customer has a workflow which requires 2 out of 3 stakeholders to approve a document before it progresses. Asking the product team to provide dynamic approval so, for example, when one stakeholder approves a document, the the workflow progresses to require one of the remaining assignees to approve the document.
5 votes -
Global filter
Box APPs would benefit from a global filter (a filter on the APP's main page). This filter would allow to see the dashboard in context:
Projects. The app displays all projects, but allows you to drill into individual projects.
Manufacturing: see an overview of all machines and a global status, but allowing to dive into any machine.
HR: getting an overview of how your hiring is doing globally, while also being able to look at individual countries / cities (multiple fields).
The way APPs is organised right now we have to create an APP for each of these views, making…
5 votes -
Reference loop variables in a conditional branch within the loop in Box Automate workflow
In a Box Automate workflow, when looping through files, we need to be able to run conditional checks on values/properties of the file within that loop.
Potential use case: a user may want the workflow to ignore certain file types, or to only run Box AI Agent operations on certain files.
Currently, many variables can be referenced within the "conditional split" element within a "loop" element, but not the loop variables themselves.
4 votes -
Add support in Box UI Elements for users to rename files before upload is completed in mobile/embedded experience
This enhancement would improve document capture workflows where meaningful filenames are needed at the point of upload for easier identification, retrieval, and downstream usability. Today, the lack of rename-during-upload support creates friction for mobile use cases, reduces efficiency when many similar files are uploaded, and can force teams to rely on custom upload logic instead of standard Box UI Elements.
Requested enhancement:
• Allow users to edit filenames before upload commit
• Ensure the experience works well on mobile form factors
• Preserve the user-defined filename in Box after upload
• Optionally support configurable naming rules or validations for admins and…12 votes -
More visibility of 'find and replace' feature
Regarding the search and replace function in Box Note— beyond displaying it with Ctrl+F, are there any plans to make it more accessible, such as adding it to the three-dot menu (⋯) or another more visible location?
The end users will find the feature and utilize it if they are not so familiar with shotcuts operation.3 votes -
Delete button too close to Download button when multiple files are selected for download.
The Delete button too close to Download button when multiple files are selected for download. Moving the Delete button to between the Tags & Move / Copy buttons would prevent arrent clicks on the wrong button.
1 vote -
Embedded Widget wont load on my website if third-party cookies are blocked in the browser
Recent changes by Box have made the embedded Widget I have been using for years useless. None of my clients allow third-party cookies by their browsers. They have been uploading files to me for years but now must "grant access" and approve cookies by Box, sometimes a four-step process to get access via the Widget on my website. Not workable. Will use a One-Drive link to solve, but disappointed. Your support team suggested I send my issue to you.
1 vote -
Allow Auto-creation and Auto-deletion of Box folders in NetSuite per record
Introduce functionality within the Box–NetSuite integration to automatically create associated Box folders when a NetSuite record is created, eliminating the need for users to manually click the “Default” button.
Additionally, enable automatic deletion of the corresponding Box folder when the related NetSuite record is deleted, ensuring better data hygiene and consistency between systems.
As part of this enhancement, provide administrators or consultants with the ability to toggle this feature on or off by record type, allowing organizations to apply automation selectively based on their business needs.Benefits:
- Reduces manual user actions and wait time for folder creation
- Improves…1 vote -
The number of entries in the view and graph do not match.
I would like the specifications to be changed so that the total number of entries in the view and the graph match.
1 voteBlank values are not counted in chart aggregates. This is by design.
-
Administrators to be able to monitor when a BOX sign is sent
BOX signを例えば外部などに送信した際に、適正なルートを通った正しい署名依頼であるか確認や未然に防止する方法を実装してほしいです。
Relayと組み合わせれば可能なことはわかっておりますが、全契約など署名が必要なものに対しRelayとの組み合わせを作成することは、現実的ではなく、下記ような管理者に通知する機能を要望します。
BOX signを送信した際に管理者(例えば契約管理担当)に自動で通知できれば、
社内決済が終わっているのか、契約内容は正しいのかなどを確認することが可能だと考えております。ご確認、ご検討をお願いします。
EN translation:
When a BOX sign is sent, for example to an external party, we would like a method implemented to verify that it is a legitimate signature request that has gone through the proper route, and to prevent such misuse.We understand that this is possible when combined with Relay, but creating a combination with Relay for all contracts and other documents requiring signatures is not practical. Therefore, we request a function to notify administrators as described below.
If administrators (e.g., contract managers) are automatically notified when a BOX sign is sent,…
1 vote -
External Notification Support
Allow for notifications to be sent to external (non-box users) partners, vendors, submitters, etc as part of an automate workflow.
Box Forms and File Request allow for seamless ingestion of content and metadata but does not allow for an easy way to update those submitters after their document has been ingested. Many times there is a formal internal review process where a submitter would want to receive an email notification as the document or application moves through the review process inside of Box.
Example use cases: notifying an external submitter that their submission has been rejected after an internal approval…
16 votes -
Security Control - Download and Print Restriction, possibility for Owners/Co-owners and Editors exceptions
Security Control - Download and Print Restriction, possibility for Owners/Co-owners and Editors to be excluded from this restriction.
Currently, for managed users it's possible to restrict all users except Owners/Co-owners and Editors.
It would be beneficial to have a similar option for restricting external users1 vote
- Don't see your idea?