Help shape the future of Box
Welcome to Box Pulse, our product feedback tool powered by UserVoice. Got an idea for how to improve Box? Share it with us and gather support or vote on other people's ideas. Your feedback is essential to informing roadmap decisions and shaping the future of our products. Thanks for joining our community!
See user guide here.
- or
No existing idea results
- ~ No ideas found ~
9865 results found
-
Colored Tags or Even Metadata and Visible Outside File
Can we suggest colored tags (or even metadata) functionality so we can track documents easier?
We have several versions of a part drawing and we wanted to track better visually when it comes to latest documents.
If also possible, can it be seen outside the file in one row with the file name or folder and can be colored? For visual ease since the current tag function has only one color (gray) and we wanted to be able to set-up a color per status tag (e.g. Approved - green, Pending - orange, etc.) for easier tracking. It would be very helpful for tracking purposes. Please see sample pictures below.
Hope to hear from you soon. Thank you!Can we suggest colored tags (or even metadata) functionality so we can track documents easier?
We have several versions of a part drawing and we wanted to track better visually when it comes to latest documents.
If also possible, can it be seen outside the file in one row with the file name or folder and can be colored? For visual ease since the current tag function has only one color (gray) and we wanted to be able to set-up a color per status tag (e.g. Approved - green, Pending - orange, etc.) for easier tracking. It would be very…1 vote -
spaces is not back
I have deleted many files, but the space is not back. Could you please help me confirm it? Thank you.
1 vote -
Request for improvement of the UI for granting permissions displayed on the content card in Box for Teams
If you try to grant permission before sending a message, you will see the error message "Return to the main window to perform this action"
We are aware that this behavior is documented in a support article.
However, the permission prompts on the content cards are confusing because they seem to require immediate action to grant permissions.
We would like to see the UI improved so that it is clear that permissions can only be granted after the message has been sent.suggestion1：Display a message that lets users know that they cannot grant permission until after they send a message.
suggestion2：Display permission grant message in permission prompt on content card after sending message＊Using Box for Teams：https://support.box.com/hc/en-us/articles/360044681474
「To Post a shared link from Box in a Teams Channel or Chat:」
4.You need to send the message before you can grant permissions. If you try to grant permissions before sending the message, an error message Return to the main window to perform this action appears.＜Box for Teamsの、コンテンツカードに表示される権限付与のUI改善依頼＞
メッセージ送信前に、権限を付与しようとすると、「メインウィンドウに戻って、この操作を実行してください。」というエラーメッセージが表示されます。
この動作について、サポート記事に記載されていることは承知しております。
しかし、コンテンツカードの権限のプロンプトでは、その場で権限付与の対応を求めているような表示であり、混乱します。
メッセージの送信後でないと、権限付与ができないことが分かるように、UIの修正を希望します。案1：メッセージ送信後でないと、権限付与ができないことが分かるようなメッセージを表示にする
案2：メッセージ送信後に、コンテンツカードの権限のプロンプトで権限付与のメッセージを表示する＊Box for Teamsの使用：https://support.box.com/hc/ja/articles/360044681474
「TeamsチャネルまたはチャットでBoxの共有リンクを投稿する」
4.権限を付与する前に、メッセージを送信する必要があります。 メッセージの送信前に権限を付与しようとすると、メインウィンドウに戻って、この操作を実行してください。 というエラーメッセージが表示されます。If you try to grant permission before sending a message, you will see the error message "Return to the main window to perform this action"
We are aware that this behavior is documented in a support article.
However, the permission prompts on the content cards are confusing because they seem to require immediate action to grant permissions.
We would like to see the UI improved so that it is clear that permissions can only be granted after the message has been sent.suggestion1：Display a message that lets users know that they cannot grant permission until after they send a message.…
12 votes -
Request for improvement to the number of users without access displayed on the content card in Box for Teams
If the user has only been invited as a group, they will be counted and shown as "without access" even though they have access permissions because they are not a direct collaborator.
We are aware that this behavior is documented in a support article.
However, the display differs from the actual situation and may induce incorrect responses, as described below.
Therefore, we would like to request a fix so that it shows the accurate number of users without access, whether they are direct collaborators or group collaborators.ex）
1.Even though the target user has access rights as a group, there is a risk that the user may be deemed to not have access rights and may be given access rights again as an individual user.
2.Even if access rights are truly required, there is a risk that the current incorrect display of the number of users without access rights will lead to missed access rights being granted.＊Using Box for Teams：https://support.box.com/hc/en-us/articles/360044681474
「Difference between Channels and Chats」
・In addition, the permissions prompt displays if other users in the chat already have access to the file through a user group, but are not direct collaborators on the file.＜Box for Teamsの、コンテンツカードに表示される、アクセス権のないユーザー数の改善依頼＞
グループとしてのみ招待されている場合、アクセス権限があるにもかかわらず、直接的なコラボレータではないため、「アクセス権がない」ユーザーとしてカウントされ、表示されます。
この動作について、サポート記事に記載されていることは承知しております。
しかし、実際の状況とは異なる表示となっており、以下のように誤った対応を誘発する可能性があります。
そのため、直接的なコラボレータ、グループのコラボレータにかかわらず、アクセス権のないユーザーの正確な数を表示するよう、修正を希望します。例）
1.グループとしてアクセス権があるのに、アクセス権がないものと判断し、ユーザーとして個別に再度アクセス権を付与してしまう。
2.本当にアクセス権の付与が必要な状態にもかかわらず、現状の誤った、アクセス権のないユーザー数の表示の影響、と誤認し、アクセス権付与の対応が漏れが発生してしまう。＊Box for Teamsの使用：https://support.box.com/hc/ja/articles/360044681474
「チャネルとチャットの相違点」
・さらに、チャットの他のメンバーがすでにユーザーグループ経由でファイルへのアクセス権限を持っているものの、ファイルの直接的なコラボレータではない場合に、権限のプロンプトが表示されます。If the user has only been invited as a group, they will be counted and shown as "without access" even though they have access permissions because they are not a direct collaborator.
We are aware that this behavior is documented in a support article.
However, the display differs from the actual situation and may induce incorrect responses, as described below.
Therefore, we would like to request a fix so that it shows the accurate number of users without access, whether they are direct collaborators or group collaborators.ex）
1.Even though the target user has access rights as a group, there…12 votes -
I want an indentation feature for box notes.
I want an indentation feature for box notes.
2 votes -
The "Invoices from box" folder where invocies are dropped can not be moved.
For easier rights management and avoiding "shared folder" ****, we opted to have one shared folder across our company with sub-folders for each department.
Said folder is shared with our accounting department.
I moved the folder "Invoices from box" from my root folder to the accounting department sub folder but each month when an invoice is issued it appears again in my root folder.
I propose that box.com remembers the folder ID of the "Invoices from box" folder and used that instead of the absolute path of the folder to drop their invoices.
1 vote -
We would like the ability to have a print button appear when one or more folders/files are selected. フォルダ/ファイルを1つ以上選択した際に印刷ボタンが表示される機能が欲しい
The current specification allows printing from the file preview screen, but if you want to print multiple files, you have to open the preview screen one by one and press the print button, which is quite time-consuming and labor-intensive.
Therefore, when you select one or more folders or files (including BoxNotes), we would like the "Print button" to be displayed on the folder/file screen or by pressing "More Options."
Also, when a folder is selected, I would like to be able to print all the materials in the selected folder.現在の仕様ではファイルのプレビュー画面から印刷が可能となりますが、複数のファイルを印刷したい場合、1つ1つプレビュー画面を開いて印刷ボタンを押す必要があり、作業的にかなりの時間と手間がかかってしまいます。
そのため、フォルダまたはファイル(BoxNotes含む)を1つ以上選択した際にフォルダ/ファイル画面上に「印刷ボタン」または、"その他オプション"を押すと「印刷ボタン」も表示されるようにしてほしいです。
またフォルダを選択した場合、選択したフォルダ内の資料が全て印刷できるようにしてほしいです。1 vote -
17 votes
-
Enterprise-Level Signature Activity Report
Add the ability to generate a report that summarizes signature request activity per user across the enterprise. The report should include metrics such as number of documents sent, signed, pending, and completed—providing admins with better visibility into usage patterns, adoption, and compliance tracking. This feature would support enterprise auditing, license optimization, and overall workflow analysis.
1 vote -
Minimal Downscoped Access Token: Profile Only
Could you add the minimum required permission to the downscope feature that allows access to the user's own profile only?
https://developer.box.com/guides/api-calls/permissions-and-errors/scopes/
ex) profile_readonlyIf third-party services can use a token with the least privilege to verify the user's login and EID,
it will help in building a more secure service.1 vote -
Minimal Downscoped Access Token: Profile Only
Could you add the minimum required permission to the downscope feature that allows access to the user's own profile only?
https://developer.box.com/guides/api-calls/permissions-and-errors/scopes/
ex) profile_readonlyIf third-party services can use a token with the least privilege to verify the user's login and EID,
it will help in building a more secure service.1 vote -
Access restriction by domain
We would like to implement access restrictions not only by IP address but also at the domain level.
This is because there are some integrated services that do not disclose their IP addresses.2 votes -
Please be able to specify which users can use the Box Graph Connector.
Currently, the Box Graph Connector is enabled for users tenant-wide, but we would like to be able to enable it for specific users.
For example, if some users are using Copilot for Microsoft 365, we need to be able to specify that only users who can use Copilot for M365 can use Box Graph Connector.
11 votes -
Ability to srt/arrange by in any aspect of Box ie files/folders or even users/groups etc.
It would be helpful to be able to sort/arrange by in every aspect of Box. One example would be managing collaborators in a folder.
For instance, if I want to add access by group, and remove all individual users, to do so I have to compare the collaborator list to the group listing and remove the individual user since they are added by group already. I cannot remove all individual users en masse because some of those individually added users must stay as they are not in one of the groups. But I do not have the ability to sort/arange by. Since the collaborators list is not arranged by name like the group member listing, it is very time-consuming to complete this task.
It would be helpful to be able to sort/arrange by in every aspect of Box. One example would be managing collaborators in a folder.
For instance, if I want to add access by group, and remove all individual users, to do so I have to compare the collaborator list to the group listing and remove the individual user since they are added by group already. I cannot remove all individual users en masse because some of those individually added users must stay as they are not in one of the groups. But I do not have the ability to sort/arange…
1 vote -
Ability to sort fields to arrange by when viewing All items
When searching through all items it would be helpful to be able to click on any of the columns headings to sort the results of a search or just through All Items.
1 vote -
Directly copy files from Salesforce's native file storage to Box via the Box Folder Component which is present on a record
Be able to drag and drop files stored in Salesforce's native file storage into the Box for Salesforce LWC to save the file down from Salesforce into the dedicated Box folder for the record.
1 vote -
Preference for preview screen panels
There is no preference in Box for what appears first when you go to the file preview screen. It used to go to Comments and Tasks, but now forces you directly to the Box AI panel and this cannot be changed. Please bring in a preference panel that lets you set the default preview panel behavior.
1 vote -
File Viewer yes loading
Could you please change the specification that requires the export folder to be a personal folder (area) when exporting the list of file viewers? Currently, in my company, only co-owners or editors can collaborate. Therefore, those with other permissions have to request collaboration from co-owners or editors. However, personal folders (areas) allow for self-collaboration, making it difficult to manage.
6 votes -
Addition of policy conditions for device protection.
The device protection has been enhanced with the addition of EDR integration functionality. However, currently, it only targets devices with EDR installed. We would like to be able to set the device security requirements in the device trust policy to include whether EDR is installed.
デバイス保護にEDR統合機能が追加されたが
現状は、EDRがインストールされたデバイスのみ
を対象としている。
デバイストラストポリシーのデバイスセキュリティ
要件に、EDRがインストールされているかを状況として
設定可能としてほしい1 vote -
Box shuttle client app for MacBooks
Box shuttle client app for MacBooks - needed badly for exited employees on Macs.
3 votes
- Don't see your idea?