Help shape the future of Box
Welcome to Box Pulse, our product feedback tool powered by UserVoice. Got an idea for how to improve Box? Share it with us and gather support or vote on other people's ideas. Your feedback is essential to informing roadmap decisions and shaping the future of our products. Thanks for joining our community!
See user guide here.
8677 results found
-
box-ui-elements support for React 18
box-ui-elements is currently unusable for versions of React >= 18
14 votes -
Enabling Public API for CFR Part 11
if a CFR-enabled user is initiates a request from the Public API, the request should be CFR-compliant.
9 votes -
Make docuworks files compatible with Box AI
富士フイルムビジネスイノベーション社のdocuworksファイル（xdw）を対応してほしい
I would like Fujifilm Business Innovation's docuworks file (xdw) to be supported.
13 votes -
Allow embed links to Box Hubs
Box Hubs would be much more useful if we could embed them onto our Intranet pages and such.
6 votes -
hyperlink source from AI in Hubs
When you ask a question in a Hub, the sources cited are just in plain text. The ask is that the sources would be hyperlinked instead.
8 votes -
BoxHubs compatibility with Information Barrier
Fix compatibility issues with BoxHubs and Information Barrier.
Currently, if Information Barrier is enabled, BoxHubs cannot be enabled, so please fix that issue.7 votes -
About the accuracy of Box AI for Hubs
I'm trying out the beta version of Box AI for Hubs.
I expected this feature to be able to combine information from multiple documents within Hubs to generate an answer.
However, at the moment, even though there is relevant information in the documentation within Hubs, only general answers are returned, and no satisfactory answers have been obtained.
As it is, it would be difficult to deploy it internally, so we would like to see further improvements in the accuracy of AI.
Please note that all content is written in Japanese.7 votes -
Calculated Fields in Box Sign
Box Sign does not currently have a way to calculate numbers that are filled out within specific fields. Examples include: setting up an order form, automatically populating contract term expiration date, and signing up forms with multiple choices.
Here's Adobe Acrobat Sign's functionality: https://helpx.adobe.com/sign/using/calculated-fields.html
And DocuSign's functionality: https://support.docusign.com/s/document-item?language=en_US&rsc_301=&bundleId=gbo1643332197980&topicId=crs1578456361259.html&_LANG=enus
7 votes -
If the owner of a Box Relay workflow is a “Deleted User”, there needs to be a way to transfer the owner to an administrator.
After creating a workflow in Box Relay, there are cases where the owner of the workflow is deleted by a script, etc., but the owner remains as a “Deleted User”.
Need the ability to take over the workflow of a Box Relay that has become a “deleted user” to an administrator or other user.
Reason：
This is because the workflow creator still has the owner rights, and even the system administrator cannot delete the workflow, so it remains as trash.
6 votes -
Hubs - Provide ability to resize or select portion of the image used in Banner
Can we have the option to resize the banner or click and drag to choose which portion of the image gets displayed?
6 votes -
Allow viewing of multi-page TIFF documents in mobile apps
We would like support for viewing multi-page Tiff documents beyond the second page in mobile apps, similar to what is already available in the web browser.
14 votes -
Content Insights reports cannot be output if there are restrictions on content creation.
(Japanese follows English)
There is a function to export Content Insights access statistics, but if you restrict content creation and prohibit the creation of first-level folders, you will not be able to export it.
Currently, there are many cases in which system administrators are required to respond to requests, which places a heavy burden on both administrators and users, and hinders the use of content insights.
Please enable output even in tenants that have restrictions on content creation, such as specifying the report output destination or outputting to a local file.
コンテンツ作成の制限が入っているとコンテンツインサイトのレポートが出力出来ない
コンテンツインサイトのアクセス統計情報をエクスポートという機能がありますが、コンテンツ作成の制限をして第一レベルのフォルダの作成を禁止している場合は出力ができません。
現状だとシステム管理者に依頼を受けて対応するケースが多く、管理者、利用者とも負荷が大きく、コンテンツインサイトの活用の阻害となっています。
レポートの出力先を指定する、ローカルにファイル出力するなどコンテンツ作成の制限が入っているテナントでも出力できるようにしてください。20 votes -
External collaboration Allow list per group
We would like to limit the external collaboration to allowed domains for a specific group not the entire tenant.
This is useful when the subsidiary company, especially a financial company, can have a limited external collaboration for security reason.103 votes -
The logo displayed in the shared link preview may violates customer's brand guidelines.
The company logo displayed in the upper left corner of the shared link preview page is incorrectly cropped and filled in.
Many use cases of the shared link should adhere to each company's brand guidelines.
Example:
-Provide a company-wide notification on a shared link of "Users in the company"
-Publish introductory material about the company's products on a shared link of "everyone with the link"The current unauthorized editing of the logo is undesirable and should be improved as soon as possible.
3 votes -
Apply classification labels with move/copy operations to folders as well.
■Apply classification labels with move/copy operations to folders as well.
The current classification label assignment is checked against the events for the files in the Box.
When there are multiple files that need to be moved/copied, it is time-consuming to specify each file individually, and the folders to move/copy to become cumbersome.
Therefore, we would like to apply the current behavior to folders as well.■移動/コピー操作を伴う分類ラベルの付与をフォルダにも適用する
現在の分類ラベルの付与は、 Box 内のファイルに対するイベントに対してチェックがなされます。
移動/コピー操作が必要なファイルが複数存在する場合、個別に指定して操作する手間が生じたり、
移動/コピー先のフォルダが煩雑になってしまい業務効率の低下が生じます。
そのため、現在の動作をフォルダにも適用することを希望します。23 votes -
Provide Box plugin for Microsoft 365 Copilot
Copilot plug-ins have the advantage that data can be handled in real time, and there are no limit to the number of items, etc.
In addition to the Graph Connector, the Box plug-in for Copilot integration is also required.
Appendix.
https://learn.microsoft.com/ja-jp/microsoft-365-copilot/extensibility/
5 votes -
Columns within Box Hubs
It would be nice to build out columns within Box and links to point to files/folders locations. Scrolling down to see all the content can get kinda of long if you have a lot of content.
3 votes -
I would like to be able to specify multiple two-factor authentication options.
I would like to be able to specify multiple two-factor authentication instead of one.
The reason is that I want to be able to use it as a sub as a backup.example: select both SMS and Authentication App.
This is helpful if a user loses their backup code and is blocked from logging in.
-in Japanese
二要素認証のオプションを複数指定できるようにしてほしい。二要素認証オプションを1つではなく
複数指定できるようにしてほしいです。
理由はバックアップとしてサブで使えるようにしたいからです。例：SMSと認証アプリの両方を選択する。
これは、ユーザーがバックアップコードを紛失し、ログインをブロックされた場合に役立ちます。3 votes -
Box Connector for Microsoft Graph
One limitation of the Box Connector for Microsoft Graph is the use of the same email address between Box and Microsoft Office.
Because the Microsoft UPN and Box email address don't match, the above functionality isn't available.
I would like to see a mechanism to relax the above restriction and allow it to work even if the Microsoft UPN and Box email address do not match.5 votes -
Edit files shared on Microsoft Teams chats without having to preview them first
Currently, when a file is shared on a Microsoft Teams chat, there is a sharing card with two buttons: Preview and Edit.
When the recipient of the shared link clicks on Edit first, an error is shown saying "Office Online failed to load", which apparently is caused by the lack of edit permissions to the file. In other words, clicking the Edit button doesn't add the necessary permissions.
On the other hand, clicking on the Preview button works fine and file is displayed as expected. After previewing, clicking on Edit also works because apparently the recipient of the shared link…11 votes
- Don't see your idea?