Help shape the future of Box
Welcome to Box Pulse, our product feedback tool powered by UserVoice. Got an idea for how to improve Box? Share it with us and gather support or vote on other people's ideas. Your feedback is essential to informing roadmap decisions and shaping the future of our products. Thanks for joining our community!
See user guide here.
9875 results found
-
Permissions requirements to apply retention Governance
The "view users content" setting is needed to apply retention policies to content that you don't personally have access to.
This setting is quite restrictive given that only one person in our company has "view users content" access.
It seems like there should be an additional setting or way to apply retention to users content without relying on this checkbox
0 votes -
External User Box Access Workflow
We'd like a modification to the external user workflow and change the text of "Not a part of <Company Name> Company"
Many external users click the "Part of <Company Name>" button as they assume incorrectly this is the proper path as they are doing business with the Company.
There is room for improvement on either the current text, addition of clarifying text, or a modified workflow.
1 vote -
Add 'Released Holds' Section to Legal Holds UI
Currently, there's no way (aside from digging through Box events) to look at Legal Hold policies that have been 'released'.
This means that once a user clicks 'Release' on a hold, there's no UI for that hold anymore whatsoever.
Digging through unique events in Usage Logs is not an answer to 'show me the holds that we've released - I want to take a quick look at the holds the team has been releasing recently'.
REQUEST: Add a 'Released Holds' section to the bottom of the existing Legal Holds UI in the Admin Console.
1 voteThank you for your suggestion.
We explored this during our initial investigations, and our customers told us they did not want record of prior holds in this view, thus potentially implicating them in still being responsible for the litigation.
This is not planned work but may be reconsidered if there is a ton of customer feedback to the contrary.
-
Box Edit Uninstaller
We like a standard un-installer for Box Edit (even if only the for the EXE version.) We are having to use the PowerShell un-installer requiring admin right assistance multiple times a week and it is not sustainable.
0 votes -
0 votes
Only AV checks and FW checks will not work on Windows Server today. This is because the info we use to evaluate is not available on Servers (it is available on Windows Workstations).
This enhancement is not planned for now, but we will investigate what will be required to support Windows Server in the future.
-
0 votes
This is currently not planned, but we will consider with additional customer demand.
-
Classification Reporting - Add Details of Classification Changes to Usage Logs
Currently, when a file's Classification level is changed, a 'Metadata -> Edited Attributes' event is generated in Usage Logs. However, this event entry doesn't say WHAT changed (aka, it could be a Classification change, it could be any other metadata change - the admin can't tell).
REQUEST: Add information to the 'Details' column of Usage Logs (and the Excel export / API event stream) about what Classification attributes (aka tell the admin what the Classification WAS, and what it is NOW).
12 votes -
Disable Folder Rename capability
I would like to have a Folder properties setting to disable Folder Rename (even for Editors).
I was testing setting up departmental folders to replicate our group file server. I want all members of the department to be able to add/remove/delete files in their folder. I was able to do that by assigning them the editor role, but that allows them to change the root level folder name. Is there a way to prevent that?
For instance, I create folders for accounting, finance, etc. I want those folders to keep the names I set and I do not want the…
28 votesInteresting suggestion, but we’re not able to prioritize this given competing priorities.
-
Forms Experience Builder (FEB) integration with Box
Box would be repository and distribution for FEB
0 votes -
Customize 'Get Training' Link in '?' Menu
Currently the '?' menu in the webapp header includes a few links, including the following blurb: "Need more help? Visit our Help Center or Get Training"
'Help Center' by default links to the Box Community site (community.box.com), but we allow admins to override this link via the 'Support Site URL' field in Admin Console -> Enterprise Settings -> Custom Setup.
'Get Training' is also linked in the blurb above (linking to training.box.com), but we currently do NOT allow admins to customize this URL.
This is problematic for some customers (especially large customers) that have fully staffed internal training teams that…
1 voteThis is not currently planned. We will reconsider this with additional demand.
-
Provide versions of Box Edit ahead of time for testing purposes
We would like to get new updates of Box Edit to test before it becomes generally available. We would also like the ability to control auto update and possibly block this feature.
0 votes -
0 votes
-
0 votes
Not currently planned at this time, but will be possible for external collaborators soon.
-
0 votes
If this refers to only showing Adobe Sign option in Open With menu for users who have Adobe Sign accounts, this is very challenging as Box does not have access to users’ account information across other 3rd party apps.
-
Add "MAC address" and "Last active date" to the "Application Usage" section of the App Use Management page in the admin console
This gives more context when admins are reviewing app usage.
0 votesThank you for your submission. However, this does not have enough demand in order to be prioritized.
We will reconsider with additional use cases.
-
0 votes
This is an edge case request. We will reconsider if there is additional demand.
-
6 votes
We understand this use case, however it is not a current priority for the team. We will let you know if anything changes.
-
0 votes
The solution to this issue is to transfer ownership of folders prior to deletion of the user account to avoid loss of data.
-
Restrict Co-owner's ability to invite additional Co-owners to a folder
Currently, once a user is granted co-owner permission to a folder, they gain the ability to grant the same permission to other users.
We would like an option that would only allow co-admins to grant permissions that are limited to editor and lower
0 votesI don’t think we would necessarily do this.
If you are a co-owner, we want you to be able to invite others up until your permission level.
-
0 votes
This is currently not planned, but we will consider with additional customer demand.
- Don't see your idea?