Help shape the future of Box
Welcome to Box Pulse, our product feedback tool powered by UserVoice. Got an idea for how to improve Box? Share it with us and gather support or vote on other people's ideas. Your feedback is essential to informing roadmap decisions and shaping the future of our products. Thanks for joining our community!
See user guide here.
- or
No existing idea results
- ~ No ideas found ~
9779 results found
-
Daily reminders on uncompleted tasks for Approvers in box relay
Would like to have a function to notify the Approver for uncompleted tasks in box relay on a daily bases. A popup when opening box of the web would also do.
When the Approver of a task is extremely busy, the current email notification is not enough, therefore would like to have an automatic reminder on a daily bases on pending approval tasks.
2 votes -
Increase scale of sort within a folder with page search query result limit
Limit the number of search results to improve results. Increase scale of items in folder that is sortable without error. Most interested in sort by file size, but should impact all types of sort.
2 votes -
Remove Logo on Expiring Embed Link
Hello, we would like the ability to remove the BOX logo when creating an expiring embed link while using the get file information. Just like the embed widget we would like the ability to disable the box logo when embedding an expiring embed link to an iFrame.
It would be a more seamless integration of BOX in the back ground as we are embedding these links into applications2 votes -
A list of users who have sent "email to all" in a report.
The "Email All" function on the collaborator list screen on the folder screen allows you to check which user sent what message and when in the "User Activity Report", but it does not allow you to check which user the "Email All" was sent to.
I understand that "Email to all" cannot be sent to users with pending invitations or when there are more than 500 collaborators,
but when there are a large number of collaborators, it is difficult to know how many users are pending, and checking the "Collaboration Report" takes time.
In addition, there may be cases where emails cannot be sent due to reasons other than those mentioned above, so I would like a function to be implemented that would make it easier to identify users who have not been able to send emails by clearly indicating in the "User Activity Report" whether emails have been sent to that user.(日本語)
タイトル：「全員にメール」を送信したユーザー一覧をレポートで確認できるようにしたいフォルダ画面のコラボレータ一覧画面上にある「全員にメール」機能は「ユーザーアクティビティレポート」でどのユーザーがいつ、どのようなメッセージで送信したのか確認する事が可能ですが、どのユーザー宛に「全員へメール」が送信されたのか確認する事はできません。
「全員にメール」は招待が保留中のユーザーやコラボレータの人数が500名以上の場合に送信できない事を理解しているが、コラボレータ人数が多い場合、保留中のユーザーがどれぐらいいるのか把握が難しく、「コラボレーションレポート」で確認するのも時間がかかります。
また、上記要因以外に送信できない場合もあり、「ユーザーアクティビティレポート」でそのユーザーへ送信されたのか明記する事で、送信できていないユーザーを把握しやすくなる為、機能実装を希望します。The "Email All" function on the collaborator list screen on the folder screen allows you to check which user sent what message and when in the "User Activity Report", but it does not allow you to check which user the "Email All" was sent to.
I understand that "Email to all" cannot be sent to users with pending invitations or when there are more than 500 collaborators,
but when there are a large number of collaborators, it is difficult to know how many users are pending, and checking the "Collaboration Report" takes time.
In addition, there may be cases where…3 votes -
Improve the UX when editing filters for a saved report
When editing the filters on a saved report, it is difficult to review the data in the "Users and Groups" field as it is very squashed.
Can you consider making this section larger so it is easier to view any users or groups included in the report. Or maybe have a button to export the list to a text file for easier viewing and modification.
1 vote -
alert to administrators and users who move files before 1TB/month/person.
If we move 1TB/person/month to Box or out of Box, we will not be able to use all of Box without issuing any alerts in advance, but we would like you to send an alert to administrators and users in advance so that we can prevent them from exceeding it.
1 vote -
display order of files/folders in the browser version of Box
Since the display order of files/folders in the browser version of Box is dynamically changed in the order of new and updated, it is often difficult to find files/folders, so I would like to change the display order like Windows Explorer.
1 vote -
files/folders display order in the browser.
Since the display order of files/folders in the browser version of Box is dynamically changed in the order of new and updated, it is often difficult to find files/folders, so I would like to change the display order like Windows Explorer.
1 vote -
Auto Classification policy does not work when folders are copied or moved
We would like to improve the behavior so that the auto-classification policy works correctly for files within the folder, even if the folder is copied or moved.
【Details】
Currently, the Auto Classification policy works correctly when files are copied or moved, but not when folders are copied or moved.
For example, if a ".dwg" file is stored in the "Technical Information" folder, there is an automatic classification policy that assigns the label "Technical Information" (not for external collaboration).
In this case, when a file with a .dwg extension is moved from the "Outside Shared" folder, it is automatically assigned the label "TECHNICAL INFOMATION".
On the other hand, moving a folder containing files with a .dwg extension does not change the classification label of the files in the folder. As a result, at least once, an external user can preview or download the file.This may be a behavior specification rather than a defect, but it is problematic behavior for business requirements.
We would like to see a fix that would allow the automatic classification policy to work on folder-by-folder moves and copies and automatically change the restrictions on important files within a folder.(I accidentally deleted a previous Pulse with the same content, so I'm reposting it. Sorry for the inconvenience.)
We would like to improve the behavior so that the auto-classification policy works correctly for files within the folder, even if the folder is copied or moved.
【Details】
Currently, the Auto Classification policy works correctly when files are copied or moved, but not when folders are copied or moved.
For example, if a ".dwg" file is stored in the "Technical Information" folder, there is an automatic classification policy that assigns the label "Technical Information" (not for external collaboration).
In this case, when a file with a .dwg extension is moved from the "Outside Shared" folder, it is automatically assigned the…32 votesUnfortunately classifying child items upon move/copy operations of the parent folder is not being considered at this time.
-
Ability to preview Box shared links such as Box Notes, Box Canvas, images, and videos when pasted
I would like to see it provide similar functionality to Box Notes.
【In Japanese】
＜タイトル＞
Box Notes、Box Canvas、画像、ビデオなどのBox共有リンクを貼り付けたときにプレビューする機能
＜本文＞
Box Notesと同様の機能を提供してほしいと思います。3 votes -
Remove Box Drive path limit 260 characters in Windows
Support longer than 260 character paths in Windows for Box Drive as this not a limitation in Windows but a limitation in Box Drive
Due to Box user rights logic, we often have very long folder paths and file names. Our all workstations are Windows 10/11 workstations. Most of our users prefer the Box Drive solution over the Box.com web app.
This leads to a situation where often paths in Box Drive are longer than 260 characters.
Windows supports MAX_PATH which lifts the 260 character restriction: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/fileio/maximum-file-path-limitation?tabs=registry
This instruction is referred in the Box instructions on this topic that state the 260 restriction
https://support.box.com/hc/en-us/articles/360044196773-Troubleshooting-Uploads-to-Box
https://support.box.com/hc/en-us/articles/360043695854-Windows-Specific-Limitations-for-Box-DriveWe would request that Box Drive would support longer paths in Windows workstations.
Support longer than 260 character paths in Windows for Box Drive as this not a limitation in Windows but a limitation in Box Drive
Due to Box user rights logic, we often have very long folder paths and file names. Our all workstations are Windows 10/11 workstations. Most of our users prefer the Box Drive solution over the Box.com web app.
This leads to a situation where often paths in Box Drive are longer than 260 characters.
Windows supports MAX_PATH which lifts the 260 character restriction: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/fileio/maximum-file-path-limitation?tabs=registry
This instruction is referred in the Box instructions on this topic that state…
3 votes -
Have "everywhere" as default for Box Search.
Can you please have "Everywhere" as default for Box Search. It is very annoying having to click "Everywhere" button every time I do a Box search.
4 votes -
Request for addition of a function to narrow down groups using the filter conditions of [Users and Groups] in the management console in the
＜Request for addition of a function to narrow down groups using the filter conditions of [Users and Groups] in the management console in the new UI＞
In the old UI, it was possible to narrow down the search by group using the "Users and Groups" filter condition in the management console.
However, with the new UI, it is not possible to narrow down groups using filter conditions.We set expiration dates on Box accounts and delete accounts when the application deadline has passed or expired.
If there were a large number of accounts, the users to be deleted were grouped together and only that group was extracted from the filter conditions, and the accounts were deleted.
If the above functionality is removed, we will have to search and delete items one by one, which will take time and man-hours, so we would like to see the new UI add the ability to narrow down groups using filter conditions, just like the old UI.＜新UIにおける管理コンソールの「ユーザーとグループ」のフィルタ条件でグループを絞り込む機能の追加要望＞
旧UIでは管理コンソールの「ユーザーとグループ」のフィルタ条件でグループで絞り込むことができていました。
しかし新UIではフィルタ条件でグループを絞り込むことができません。私たちはBoxアカウントに利用期限を設けており、申請期日を迎えたまたは経過したかアカウントを削除しています。
件数が多い場合は、削除対象者をグループにまとめてそのグループのみをフィルタ条件から抽出し、アカウントの削除を行っていました。
上記機能がなくなると1件ずつ検索して削除することになり時間と工数がかかるため、旧UIのように新UIでもフィルタ条件でグループを絞り込める機能を追加してほしいです。＜Request for addition of a function to narrow down groups using the filter conditions of [Users and Groups] in the management console in the new UI＞
In the old UI, it was possible to narrow down the search by group using the "Users and Groups" filter condition in the management console.
However, with the new UI, it is not possible to narrow down groups using filter conditions.We set expiration dates on Box accounts and delete accounts when the application deadline has passed or expired.
If there were a large number of accounts, the users to be deleted were grouped…9 votes -
I want to share edit access to a document I uploaded into Box, but I don't have that permission in the folder.
Please add a button to contact the owner of a BOX file, requesting either permission to add people, or to list people desired to be added. Right now there is nothing I can do to get my coworker access to a collaborative file. I need to put it in a box folder that the team is using, but the whole team is not on the list of editors. I cannot add the team members, and I do not have a good way of contacting the box folder owners. I'd like a button for that purpose.
1 vote -
VS Exposure-type Ransomware
Suggestion.
Box Shield classification labels should be able to prohibit downloading via Box desktop (BoxDrive) or via linked apps, even if you are the co-owner or owner.Background Threat.
Currently, the mainstream of ransomware worldwide is not of the encryption type, but of the exposure-type or dual-threat-type.
Version control functions are not effective against exposure-type and dual-threat ransomware.
An effective countermeasure against this type of ransomware is to prohibit the downloading of confidential files that should not be disclosed on the dark web.Issue to solve.
Box Shield's no-download access policy and access policy restricting linked apps do not target co-owner and owners.
Please change the access policy to cover co-owners and owners so that even if a PC is infected with ransomware and the security product's measures are circumvented, the confidential files will still be protected.
Co-owners can intentionally change their labels, but that is completely irrelevant because what happens when a PC is infected with ransomware is a command-driven download.
Rather, the ideal control is that if you intentionally change the label, you can download, but if you don't, you can't.Suggestion.
Box Shield classification labels should be able to prohibit downloading via Box desktop (BoxDrive) or via linked apps, even if you are the co-owner or owner.Background Threat.
Currently, the mainstream of ransomware worldwide is not of the encryption type, but of the exposure-type or dual-threat-type.
Version control functions are not effective against exposure-type and dual-threat ransomware.
An effective countermeasure against this type of ransomware is to prohibit the downloading of confidential files that should not be disclosed on the dark web.Issue to solve.
Box Shield's no-download access policy and access policy restricting linked apps do not target…1 vote -
Custom URL for File Request Links
Allow Contributors to make a custom URL for File Request. This is available for Shared Links. Having a Editable File Request allows branding for URLS.
3 votes -
Exclude certified eco-solutions from Device Trust Requirements' setting
I think that when I enable the setting for "Web App & 3rd Party Apps" in the Device Trust Requirements, the certified EcoSolutions are also restricted.
We would like to exclude certified eco-solutions from Device Trust Requirements like Box’s applications, so we request specification change to allow "3rdParty Apps" to be specified in a whitelist or blacklist format.デバイストラストの設定の際、(Web App & 3rdParty Apps）を有効化した場合、認定エコソリューションについても制限されるとの認識です。
認定エコソリューションをBox社アプリと同様に制御対象外としたく、「3rdParty Apps」 をホワイトリスト or ブラックリスト形式で指定できるように仕様変更の検討をお願いします。4 votes -
Hiding your contact info
Nice touch that not only you don't offer any technical support for your customers, but you don't allow any comments that have Customer Service in the subject line. Way to go.
1 vote -
customer support
Why don't you offer any technical support? This whole website has changed, it's impossible to do tasks now that used to take me a few minutes. This company has gone Way Downhill. PLEASE POST CUSTOMER SUPPORT ACCESS CLEARLY ON YOUR OPENING PAGE OF YOUR WEBSITE. Stop hiding it.
1 vote -
why can't I move files from one box folder to another anymore?
How about you don't change the way your site operates so I don't waste an hour trying to move a file from one folder to another? I'm a longtime user and this task usually takes me 3 minutes.
1 vote
- Don't see your idea?