Help shape the future of Box
Welcome to Box Pulse, our product feedback tool powered by UserVoice. Got an idea for how to improve Box? Share it with us and gather support or vote on other people's ideas. Your feedback is essential to informing roadmap decisions and shaping the future of our products. Thanks for joining our community!
See user guide here.
- or
No existing idea results
- ~ No ideas found ~
9665 results found
-
Request：Unmanaged users Behaviour
There is a folder whose collaboration is allowed for only internal ( At folder settings, Restrict collaboratio within our company is checked )
One unmanaged user who uses company email domain but is associated with free box account is invited the folder, he/she is successfully invited. But auto expirtation for external collaborators ( which is set on enterprise settings) is also adopted to the user. This seems unnatrual and it is not reasonable.This is said by design, but could you consider improvng either 1 or 2 ?
1. if a folder is only allowed to collaborate internal, please restrict unmanaged users have been invited it.- If an unmanaed user is able to be invited in a folder only for internals, please handle the unamnaged user as same as managed users. don't treat like external users.
1 is best for us, for some particular reasons we can not use auto-rollin feature, and some part of users who use happened to make free box accounts by themseves.
There is a folder whose collaboration is allowed for only internal ( At folder settings, Restrict collaboratio within our company is checked )
One unmanaged user who uses company email domain but is associated with free box account is invited the folder, he/she is successfully invited. But auto expirtation for external collaborators ( which is set on enterprise settings) is also adopted to the user. This seems unnatrual and it is not reasonable.This is said by design, but could you consider improvng either 1 or 2 ?
1. if a folder is only allowed to collaborate internal, please restrict…2 votes -
Creating accounts containing double-byte characters should not be allowed, which violates RFC5322
Creating accounts containing double-byte characters should not be allowed, which violates RFC5322
(Reason)
Currently, it is possible to create a new account containing double-byte characters in an email address, but it cannot be activated because it cannot receive mail. However, as a result, accounts containing double-byte characters exist like zombies.In some external cloud services (Salesforce), this causes errors when retrieving the user list, but the root cause of this problem in the first place is that Box can create new accounts containing double-byte characters, which violates RFP5322 "3.4.1. Addr-Spec Specification," so I would like to see this specification changed.
(日本語)
RFC5322に違反する、全角文字を含むアカウント作成は許可すべきではない(理由)
現在、メールアドレスに全角文字を含む新規アカウントを作成することは可能であるが、メールを受信できないためアクティベートできない。しかし、その結果、全角文字を含むアカウントがゾンビのように存在してしまう。一部の外部クラウドサービス (Salesforce)では、これに起因してユーザー一覧取得時にエラーが起きるのだが、そもそもこの問題の根本的な原因は、Boxが2バイト文字を含む新しいアカウントを作成できることであり、RFP5322の"3.4.1. Addr-Spec Specification"に違反しているため、この仕様を変更してほしいです。
Creating accounts containing double-byte characters should not be allowed, which violates RFC5322
(Reason)
Currently, it is possible to create a new account containing double-byte characters in an email address, but it cannot be activated because it cannot receive mail. However, as a result, accounts containing double-byte characters exist like zombies.In some external cloud services (Salesforce), this causes errors when retrieving the user list, but the root cause of this problem in the first place is that Box can create new accounts containing double-byte characters, which violates RFP5322 "3.4.1. Addr-Spec Specification," so I would like to see this specification changed.
…
7 votes -
About Updating Assignee (s) Set to Workflow
Please improve so that when a user account is deleted by an administrator, it is also automatically deleted from the Assignee(s) in the workflow.
This is because a deleted user remaining in the workflow Assignee (s) can cause the workflow to stop and cause unintended actions.
Improvements are needed to ensure that the user's work is not interrupted.- in Japanese
管理者によってユーザーアカウントが削除された際、
連動してワークフローの担当者からも自動的に削除されるように改善をお願いいたします。BoxRelayのワークフローに設定される担当者に削除済のユーザーが残っていることでワークフローが停止されたり意図しない動作が発生する可能性があるためです。
ユーザーの業務が中断されないために改善が必要です。3 votes -
Box for Teams should disallow the use of the default folder.
Box for Teams should have the option to disallow using the default channel destination folder. This folder isn't connected to any person and can make it difficult to track data usage back to a department.
1 vote -
My client signed a file in Box Sign but it shows pending on my end. How do I get the signed copy?
I just want HELP FFS
1 vote -
Email Distribution List for Invoices
An option to forward invoices to multiple recipients in cases where various departments or vendors need copies of them.
1 vote -
Multiple Billing Contacts / Distribution option for invoices
Ability to add multiple billing contacts, or a distribution list, so invoices will be sent automatically to different personnel, departments, or vendors who need them such as a parent company, or compliance.
1 vote -
Search in safari broken
When searching within Safari the search is performed within the current folder with the option for Everywhere and Within <folder> appearing at the top.
In Safari when clicking on either Everywhere or Within this Folder the search disappears. As a result it is difficult to search everywhere, requiring a search to be done from the top parent folder.
This doesn't happen in Chrome, and seems to be a bug.
(For others that come across this, as a work around, pressing the down arrow then enter properly selects Everywhere without the search disappearing)
1 vote -
Daily reminders on uncompleted tasks for Approvers in box relay
Would like to have a function to notify the Approver for uncompleted tasks in box relay on a daily bases. A popup when opening box of the web would also do.
When the Approver of a task is extremely busy, the current email notification is not enough, therefore would like to have an automatic reminder on a daily bases on pending approval tasks.
2 votes -
Increase scale of sort within a folder with page search query result limit
Limit the number of search results to improve results. Increase scale of items in folder that is sortable without error. Most interested in sort by file size, but should impact all types of sort.
2 votes -
Remove Logo on Expiring Embed Link
Hello, we would like the ability to remove the BOX logo when creating an expiring embed link while using the get file information. Just like the embed widget we would like the ability to disable the box logo when embedding an expiring embed link to an iFrame.
It would be a more seamless integration of BOX in the back ground as we are embedding these links into applications2 votes -
A list of users who have sent "email to all" in a report.
The "Email All" function on the collaborator list screen on the folder screen allows you to check which user sent what message and when in the "User Activity Report", but it does not allow you to check which user the "Email All" was sent to.
I understand that "Email to all" cannot be sent to users with pending invitations or when there are more than 500 collaborators,
but when there are a large number of collaborators, it is difficult to know how many users are pending, and checking the "Collaboration Report" takes time.
In addition, there may be cases where emails cannot be sent due to reasons other than those mentioned above, so I would like a function to be implemented that would make it easier to identify users who have not been able to send emails by clearly indicating in the "User Activity Report" whether emails have been sent to that user.(日本語)
タイトル：「全員にメール」を送信したユーザー一覧をレポートで確認できるようにしたいフォルダ画面のコラボレータ一覧画面上にある「全員にメール」機能は「ユーザーアクティビティレポート」でどのユーザーがいつ、どのようなメッセージで送信したのか確認する事が可能ですが、どのユーザー宛に「全員へメール」が送信されたのか確認する事はできません。
「全員にメール」は招待が保留中のユーザーやコラボレータの人数が500名以上の場合に送信できない事を理解しているが、コラボレータ人数が多い場合、保留中のユーザーがどれぐらいいるのか把握が難しく、「コラボレーションレポート」で確認するのも時間がかかります。
また、上記要因以外に送信できない場合もあり、「ユーザーアクティビティレポート」でそのユーザーへ送信されたのか明記する事で、送信できていないユーザーを把握しやすくなる為、機能実装を希望します。The "Email All" function on the collaborator list screen on the folder screen allows you to check which user sent what message and when in the "User Activity Report", but it does not allow you to check which user the "Email All" was sent to.
I understand that "Email to all" cannot be sent to users with pending invitations or when there are more than 500 collaborators,
but when there are a large number of collaborators, it is difficult to know how many users are pending, and checking the "Collaboration Report" takes time.
In addition, there may be cases where…3 votes -
Improve the UX when editing filters for a saved report
When editing the filters on a saved report, it is difficult to review the data in the "Users and Groups" field as it is very squashed.
Can you consider making this section larger so it is easier to view any users or groups included in the report. Or maybe have a button to export the list to a text file for easier viewing and modification.
1 vote -
alert to administrators and users who move files before 1TB/month/person.
If we move 1TB/person/month to Box or out of Box, we will not be able to use all of Box without issuing any alerts in advance, but we would like you to send an alert to administrators and users in advance so that we can prevent them from exceeding it.
1 vote -
display order of files/folders in the browser version of Box
Since the display order of files/folders in the browser version of Box is dynamically changed in the order of new and updated, it is often difficult to find files/folders, so I would like to change the display order like Windows Explorer.
1 vote -
files/folders display order in the browser.
Since the display order of files/folders in the browser version of Box is dynamically changed in the order of new and updated, it is often difficult to find files/folders, so I would like to change the display order like Windows Explorer.
1 vote -
Auto Classification policy does not work when folders are copied or moved
We would like to improve the behavior so that the auto-classification policy works correctly for files within the folder, even if the folder is copied or moved.
【Details】
Currently, the Auto Classification policy works correctly when files are copied or moved, but not when folders are copied or moved.
For example, if a ".dwg" file is stored in the "Technical Information" folder, there is an automatic classification policy that assigns the label "Technical Information" (not for external collaboration).
In this case, when a file with a .dwg extension is moved from the "Outside Shared" folder, it is automatically assigned the label "TECHNICAL INFOMATION".
On the other hand, moving a folder containing files with a .dwg extension does not change the classification label of the files in the folder. As a result, at least once, an external user can preview or download the file.This may be a behavior specification rather than a defect, but it is problematic behavior for business requirements.
We would like to see a fix that would allow the automatic classification policy to work on folder-by-folder moves and copies and automatically change the restrictions on important files within a folder.(I accidentally deleted a previous Pulse with the same content, so I'm reposting it. Sorry for the inconvenience.)
We would like to improve the behavior so that the auto-classification policy works correctly for files within the folder, even if the folder is copied or moved.
【Details】
Currently, the Auto Classification policy works correctly when files are copied or moved, but not when folders are copied or moved.
For example, if a ".dwg" file is stored in the "Technical Information" folder, there is an automatic classification policy that assigns the label "Technical Information" (not for external collaboration).
In this case, when a file with a .dwg extension is moved from the "Outside Shared" folder, it is automatically assigned the…32 votesUnfortunately classifying child items upon move/copy operations of the parent folder is not being considered at this time.
-
Ability to preview Box shared links such as Box Notes, Box Canvas, images, and videos when pasted
I would like to see it provide similar functionality to Box Notes.
【In Japanese】
＜タイトル＞
Box Notes、Box Canvas、画像、ビデオなどのBox共有リンクを貼り付けたときにプレビューする機能
＜本文＞
Box Notesと同様の機能を提供してほしいと思います。3 votes -
Remove Box Drive path limit 260 characters in Windows
Support longer than 260 character paths in Windows for Box Drive as this not a limitation in Windows but a limitation in Box Drive
Due to Box user rights logic, we often have very long folder paths and file names. Our all workstations are Windows 10/11 workstations. Most of our users prefer the Box Drive solution over the Box.com web app.
This leads to a situation where often paths in Box Drive are longer than 260 characters.
Windows supports MAX_PATH which lifts the 260 character restriction: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/fileio/maximum-file-path-limitation?tabs=registry
This instruction is referred in the Box instructions on this topic that state the 260 restriction
https://support.box.com/hc/en-us/articles/360044196773-Troubleshooting-Uploads-to-Box
https://support.box.com/hc/en-us/articles/360043695854-Windows-Specific-Limitations-for-Box-DriveWe would request that Box Drive would support longer paths in Windows workstations.
Support longer than 260 character paths in Windows for Box Drive as this not a limitation in Windows but a limitation in Box Drive
Due to Box user rights logic, we often have very long folder paths and file names. Our all workstations are Windows 10/11 workstations. Most of our users prefer the Box Drive solution over the Box.com web app.
This leads to a situation where often paths in Box Drive are longer than 260 characters.
Windows supports MAX_PATH which lifts the 260 character restriction: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/fileio/maximum-file-path-limitation?tabs=registry
This instruction is referred in the Box instructions on this topic that…
3 votes -
Request for addition of a function to narrow down groups using the filter conditions of [Users and Groups] in the management console in the
＜Request for addition of a function to narrow down groups using the filter conditions of [Users and Groups] in the management console in the new UI＞
In the old UI, it was possible to narrow down the search by group using the "Users and Groups" filter condition in the management console.
However, with the new UI, it is not possible to narrow down groups using filter conditions.We set expiration dates on Box accounts and delete accounts when the application deadline has passed or expired.
If there were a large number of accounts, the users to be deleted were grouped together and only that group was extracted from the filter conditions, and the accounts were deleted.
If the above functionality is removed, we will have to search and delete items one by one, which will take time and man-hours, so we would like to see the new UI add the ability to narrow down groups using filter conditions, just like the old UI.＜新UIにおける管理コンソールの「ユーザーとグループ」のフィルタ条件でグループを絞り込む機能の追加要望＞
旧UIでは管理コンソールの「ユーザーとグループ」のフィルタ条件でグループで絞り込むことができていました。
しかし新UIではフィルタ条件でグループを絞り込むことができません。私たちはBoxアカウントに利用期限を設けており、申請期日を迎えたまたは経過したかアカウントを削除しています。
件数が多い場合は、削除対象者をグループにまとめてそのグループのみをフィルタ条件から抽出し、アカウントの削除を行っていました。
上記機能がなくなると1件ずつ検索して削除することになり時間と工数がかかるため、旧UIのように新UIでもフィルタ条件でグループを絞り込める機能を追加してほしいです。＜Request for addition of a function to narrow down groups using the filter conditions of [Users and Groups] in the management console in the new UI＞
In the old UI, it was possible to narrow down the search by group using the "Users and Groups" filter condition in the management console.
However, with the new UI, it is not possible to narrow down groups using filter conditions.We set expiration dates on Box accounts and delete accounts when the application deadline has passed or expired.
If there were a large number of accounts, the users to be deleted were grouped…9 votes
- Don't see your idea?