9667 results found

1. Hide Apps Link from Blue Left Menu

   Our organization is using Box to store controlled information so to best control the sharing of our documents we are only enabling a very limited number of 3rd party app integrations. We have disabled most of the apps via Enterprise settings. However users still can see the Apps menu and we are receiving a lot of negative feedback related to integrations available that as an Enterprise we will not enable. Is it possible to hide the "Apps" in the Blue left menu for non-admin users via group or other action?

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Web App  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

2. Provide option to omit the Signup and Login buttons from shared links (downloladable)

   Please provide the option to omit the Signup and Login buttons for shared links (downloadable).

   The presence of the Signup and Login buttons reduces the value of our Box.com account since the only way to circumvent the Box.com marketing fluff is to copy file from box to our CMS rather than just referencing our Box.com files. The existence of the Signup button both on the preview and pop-up that displays after clicking download results in calls to our support center from visitors to our website. The embed widget unfortunately doesn't improve the issue. Alternatively, if we could embed the Box direct link, problem solved, but that is not possible due to CORS issues.

   Please provide the option to omit the Signup and Login buttons for shared links (downloadable).

   The presence of the Signup and Login buttons reduces the value of our Box.com account since the only way to circumvent the Box.com marketing fluff is to copy file from box to our CMS rather than just referencing our Box.com files. The existence of the Signup button both on the preview and pop-up that displays after clicking download results in calls to our support center from visitors to our website. The embed widget unfortunately doesn't improve the issue. Alternatively, if we could embed the Box… more

   11 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   1 comment  ·  Preview  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

3. file request with BVE

   Currently we are using BVE and have a firewall setting to block the normal app.box.com.
   When our group/subsidiary companies try to upload a file through file request, since the link URL is https://upload.app.box.com, they cannot upload a file via file request.
   It would be great if we can make a file request link that is BVE so the URL is https://upload.ent.box.com.

   20 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   1 comment  ·  Web App  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

4. Easier access to Box.com versus local box folder from the box menu

   I use a mac. To go to a folder, I can click the box icon on my menu bar and there is the folder icon. But, to go to box notes (very popular with my team) or box.com, I must click down into the box settings. Please bring box.com up to the level of the box folder in your menu.

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Box Drive  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

5. User Classification

   Our organization uses Box to manage our controlled documentation. To access this information people, need to meet certain criteria to access certain types of documents. Box is great for classifying documents, but we are looking for a way to classify users to make it easy to know if we are able to share a specific document with a specific user. We would like to be able to add a property, tag, or some other identifier to a user's profile that would allow us to classify a user as a specific type. We would then like this classification to become a visual part of that user's profile, so at a quick glance we can quickly determine the classification of the user when changing permissions or most importantly when sharing. Can we create this user classification field and then have that create a visual indicator (tag, color, image, etc.) each time that user appears in permissions, sharing people picker, etc. so we can quickly determine by a tag, color, or other indicator the classification of a user?

   Today how we are working around this is by adding additional text to the "Profile Name" of a user "Your Name - (Classification) but would like to have a more formal method to classify users. As a second option, we have tried to use user profile pictures to portray a user's classification by color but unfortunately the profile pictures do not carry into the "people picker" when setting up a sharing request. Both of these are workarounds vs. having a specific user classification property on the user profile.

   To summarize the ask is for the ability to tag/classify users and have that visually appear when choosing users to share with or when assigning/viewing file/folder permissions. Thank you.

   Our organization uses Box to manage our controlled documentation. To access this information people, need to meet certain criteria to access certain types of documents. Box is great for classifying documents, but we are looking for a way to classify users to make it easy to know if we are able to share a specific document with a specific user. We would like to be able to add a property, tag, or some other identifier to a user's profile that would allow us to classify a user as a specific type. We would then like this classification to become a… more

   6 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Users and Groups  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

6. Filter during multiple edits

   When multiple users are editing the same document online, if one person applies a filter condition, it is applied for all users. Can we have options to apply filter only for self or for all users as per individual's choice? I have seen this feature while editing excels in Sharepoint. It would really help when we have lengthy spreadsheets to edit.

   2 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   1 comment  ·  Box Tools  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

7. Ability to change file/folder name rich text

   It would be lovely if a user could change the font/color/bold/underline on file and folder names.
   
   We have a scenario where we are going to "archive" certain shared folders and lump them under a single folder but it would be nice if we could change the color of the text of the folder name to say red and maybe make it bold. It would stand out in the list of all folders in the root.

   2 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  New UI  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

8. Viewing and Downloading EPUB files

   As outlined in Case # 2783413
   We were unable to share an link to an EPUB which had watermarking embedded in the file.
   Workarounds included zipping up the EPUB first.
   It would be wonderful to get full EPUB support where you can view the EPUB (ie see the cover image, and even the contents of the EPUB book and allow anyone with the link to download the file.

   As was discovered in the case mentioned above, it turns out some EPUBs can at least be downloaded if they didn't contain watermarking. Publishers put in watermarking so removing these is not possible. Box should allow anyone with the link as your own U.I. suggests can download the file.

   As outlined in Case # 2783413
   We were unable to share an link to an EPUB which had watermarking embedded in the file.
   Workarounds included zipping up the EPUB first.
   It would be wonderful to get full EPUB support where you can view the EPUB (ie see the cover image, and even the contents of the EPUB book and allow anyone with the link to download the file.

   As was discovered in the case mentioned above, it turns out some EPUBs can at least be downloaded if they didn't contain watermarking. Publishers put in watermarking so removing these is not… more

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Box Drive  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

9. I want the general user to be notified when an item is copied or moved and the process is complete.

   　When an item is copied or moved, a message is displayed indicating that the move is complete, but when the target folder is checked, the process may not be complete.
   　After moving or copying large data, the user may immediately see "copy completed" but the process is not actually completed, confusing the user.
   　Currently, general users can only visually confirm that the process is complete, and the only way to confirm that the process is complete is to request a user with administrative privileges to output a user activity report.
   　Therefore, we would like to see a function implemented to notify general users when processing is completed.

   ＜in Japanese＞
   　アイテムをコピーや移動した際、移動が完了したというメッセージが表示されるが、対象フォルダを確認すると処理が完了していないことがある。
   　大きいデータを移動、コピーしたらすぐに「コピーが完了した」と表示される場合があるが実際には処理は完了していないため、ユーザーが混乱します。
   　現状、一般ユーザは処理が完了したことを目視でしか確認ができず、完了したことをするためには管理者権限を持つユーザにユーザアクティビティレポートを出力依頼し確認するしかない。
   　そのため、処理が完了したら、一般ユーザに通知される機能を実装してほしい。

   　When an item is copied or moved, a message is displayed indicating that the move is complete, but when the target folder is checked, the process may not be complete.
   　After moving or copying large data, the user may immediately see "copy completed" but the process is not actually completed, confusing the user.
   　Currently, general users can only visually confirm that the process is complete, and the only way to confirm that the process is complete is to request a user with administrative privileges to output a user activity report.
   　Therefore, we would like to see a function implemented to… more

   4 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Web App  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

10. Permanently mark a file as not malicious

    We had a user (with Box Drive) who had a file marked as malicious. She apparently made a change to a local copy and added it back to her folder, causing it to be marked as malicious a second time. In fairness, the hash is different, since the file changed. When I looked at the first event, I ran the file through VT, and the results came back as all clean, so I marked it as not malicious. The user was still not able to access the file. I had to go back into Shield, find the second instance, scan it with VT, and mark it as not malicious there also. The user was then able to access the file. I'm concerned that each time she makes a change to the file, it will be flagged as malicious again by Shield. It would be helpful if there was a way to mark the file as not malicious in a way that would persist.

    We had a user (with Box Drive) who had a file marked as malicious. She apparently made a change to a local copy and added it back to her folder, causing it to be marked as malicious a second time. In fairness, the hash is different, since the file changed. When I looked at the first event, I ran the file through VT, and the results came back as all clean, so I marked it as not malicious. The user was still not able to access the file. I had to go back into Shield, find the second instance, scan… more

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Shield  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

11. Add Signer URL to Box for Salesforce

    Add signer redirect URLs to Box for Salesforce, so that they can be included in Salesforce Templates or added to automated Slack messages.

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Partner Integrations  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

12. Provide Signer API to add signature images

    To support use cases with legacy signature pads, we need to provide a way to programmatically add a signature image captured from a legacy signature pad.

    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Box Sign  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

13. Offer terms of service feature for shared links

    Allows a prompt to appear for external users to acknowledge confidentiality, currently exists if sharing a folder via direct email invite, but not when you copy a shared link.

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Governance  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

14. Reflect Power Point page number settings in Box preview

    When page numbers are inserted in Power Point starting from the slide following the cover page and the slide start number is set to 0, there is a difference in the page numbers when viewed from the Power Point desktop application and when previewed in Box.
    In the Power Point app, the slide on the page following the cover page has a page number of 1, but in the Box preview screen it is 2.

    There is no workaround for users invited with previewer or shared via a view-only shared link, as they cannot edit or download.
    Please reflect the page numbers set in the Power Point application on the preview screen as well, as there will be discrepancies in recognition depending on the display method.

    (日本語)
    ＜Power Pointのページ番号をBoxのプレビュー時に反映させる＞
    Power Pointで表紙の次のスライドからページ番号を挿入した場合に、スライド開始番号を0にしているとPower Pointのデスクトップアプリから閲覧した時とBoxでプレビュー時でページ番号に差異が生じます。
    Power Pointのアプリでは表紙の次のスライドがのページ番号が1となっていますが、Boxのプレビュー画面では2となります。

    プレビューアー権限のユーザーや表示のみの共有リンクで共有した場合は、編集やダウンロードができないため回避する方法がありません。

    表示方法によって認識にずれが生じるため、Power Pointアプリで設定したページ番号をプレビューアー画面にも反映してください。

    When page numbers are inserted in Power Point starting from the slide following the cover page and the slide start number is set to 0, there is a difference in the page numbers when viewed from the Power Point desktop application and when previewed in Box.
    In the Power Point app, the slide on the page following the cover page has a page number of 1, but in the Box preview screen it is 2.

    There is no workaround for users invited with previewer or shared via a view-only shared link, as they cannot edit or download.
    Please reflect the… more

    24 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Preview  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

15. Ability to authenticate the Box for EMM app from Safari to Microsoft Edge

    When logging in with the mobile app "Box for EMM", if SSO is linked with AzureAD, the built-in Safari will start and the sign-in screen will be displayed.
    I would like to see you implement the ability to switch this to Microsoft Edge using an App Configuration Policy in Intune.

    The Slack for EMM app has this function, so I will share the URL for your reference.
    https://slack.com/intl/ja-jp/help/articles/115002579426-OrG-

    The reason is that our company manages iPhone / iPad using AzureAD × Intune.
    We use AzureA conditional access when accessing each SaaS, and we set "Requires an approved client app" for access from mobile devices such as iOS / iPadOS.

    This setting can be used in conjunction with the App Protection Policy to prevent data from being downloaded from Box to your iPhone, reducing the risk of a data leak, but "approved client apps" include Safari. If you have this setting, you will not be able to log in with Box for EMM.

    If you disable this setting to log in, you will be able to download files from Box using a browser such as Safari, creating the risk of information leakage.

    So I would like to see an app configuration policy that allows switching the built-in browser to Microsoft Edge.

    ---

    モバイル用アプリ「Box for EMM」でログインを行う際、AzureADでSSO連携をしている場合、ログイン時に組み込みSafariが起動してサインイン画面が表示されます。
    これを Intune のアプリ構成ポリシーを使用して Microsofr Edge に切り替える機能を実装していただきたいです。

    Slack for EMMアプリには当該機能がありますので、参考までにURLを共有いたします。
    https://slack.com/intl/ja-jp/help/articles/115002579426-OrG-%E3%81%AE%E3%82%A8%E3%83%B3%E3%82%BF%E3%83%BC%E3%83%97%E3%83%A9%E3%82%A4%E3%82%BA%E3%83%A2%E3%83%93%E3%83%AA%E3%83%86%E3%82%A3%E7%AE%A1%E7%90%86%E3%82%92%E6%9C%89%E5%8A%B9%E3%81%AB%E3%81%99%E3%82%8B

    理由としましては、弊社では AzureAD × Intune を用いて iPhone / iPad を管理しています。
    各SaaSへのアクセス時には AzureA の条件付きアクセスを使用しており、iOS / iPadOS などのモバイルデバイスからのアクセスには「承認されたクライアント アプリが必要です」を設定しています。

    この設定とアプリ保護ポリシーを併用することで、Box から iPhone にデータをダウンロードすることを防げ、データ漏洩のリスクを軽減することができますが、「承認されたクライアント アプリ」には Safari が含まれていないため、この設定を行っていると、Box for EMM でログインができません。

    ログインを行うためにこの設定を無効にしてしまうと、Safari などのブラウザを使用して Box からファイルのダウンロードができるようになってしまい、情報漏洩のリスクが発生してしまいます。

    そのため、アプリ構成ポリシーで組み込みブラウザを Microsoft Edge に切り替えられるようにできるようにしていただきたいです。

    When logging in with the mobile app "Box for EMM", if SSO is linked with AzureAD, the built-in Safari will start and the sign-in screen will be displayed.
    I would like to see you implement the ability to switch this to Microsoft Edge using an App Configuration Policy in Intune.

    The Slack for EMM app has this function, so I will share the URL for your reference.
    https://slack.com/intl/ja-jp/help/articles/115002579426-OrG-

    The reason is that our company manages iPhone / iPad using AzureAD × Intune.
    We use AzureA conditional access when accessing each SaaS, and we set "Requires an approved client app" for… more

    8 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Mobile  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

16. Box sign admin dashboard

    A dashboard for the admin that shows all of the Box Sign documents for the enterprise

    9 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Box Sign  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

17. Ability to extend API to query all collections

    Hello dear Box Developers / Product Managers,

    i'm Leon from CI HUB (ci-hub.com). A box Customer (Nina Stenzler) also uses the box CI HUB Integraiton and wondered why she can't view her box collections there. I was so sad that we cannot query them via your API (currently only favorites). Could you please extend your API here, so we can query all collections? That would be soooo nice for us and our customers :)

    This is the corresponding Endpoint which needs to be extended: https://developer.box.com/reference/get-collections/

    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Developer Platform  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

18. Access for external collaborators by FTPS not limited to initial bulk uploading.

    Allow unlimited access for External business partners who use proper file transfer protocols such as SFTP or FTPS

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Core & Technical Infrastructure  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

19. UX switching 2FA method

    Changing 2FA method requires removing first. This breaks existing shared feeds for others and is alarming.
    The way you need to re-accept then go back and forth between pages refreshing each time before it shows as re-established is far from "Simple" or intuitive.

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Security  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

20. Make 2FA by e-mail work for the accessible-site

    Make 2FA by e-mail work for the accessible-site

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Security  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating