9660 results found

1. Set default classification for all uploads with Box Classification

   When every file is uploaded, set a default Classification value that can be updated manually or via a partner (Netskope, SkyHigh, Titus, etc.).

   13 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Shield  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating
   not planned  ·  AdminAnonymous (Admin, Box) responded

   Default classification label is not planned because it could be misleading to end users. However, to address the concern of content being leaked before it is classified, you can create an access policy applying to “All content without a classification label” in Box Shield.

2. Get list of service accounts via API

   Right now the only way to get a list of automation users (service accounts) is via the web UI. The application does not have UI access, and since the users can be provisioned and deleted frequently, we do not want to rely on the manual work.

   13 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Developer Platform  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

3. New 3D Preview File Type: CAD Files

   Box's native 3D Preview feature does not currently support common CAD file types such as...
   .idw
   .ipt
   .iam
   .dwf
   .dwfx

   REQUEST: Natively support 3D preview in Box for these common CAD file types.

   13 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   not planned  ·  1 comment  ·  Preview  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

4. Mount Box Drive as a letter drive
   13 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   2 comments  ·  Box Drive  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating
   not planned  ·  Anonymous responded

   Mounting Box as a letter drive is not currently on the roadmap. As a workaround, we are enabling the ability to customize the Box location so you can place it under a different HD partition. More details can be found here: https://pulse.box.com/admin/v3#ng!/suggestions/35982937

5. Add support for symbolic links
   13 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Box Drive  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating
   not planned  ·  Anonymous responded

   We currently do not have this planned on our roadmap.  Please keep the feedback & use cases coming to help us prioritize this in the future!

6. Option to Show Full Folder Hierarchy when Added Only to Subfolder

   Right now, when collaborators are added to a folder, they are not able to see the folder hierarchy that is above the level at which they were added. This is great in many situations.

   However, there are various scenarios where customers would like users to have the 'full view' of the folder hierarchy above.

   13 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   not planned  ·  3 comments  ·  Core & Technical Infrastructure  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

7. Add Sort by 'Status' Option to Managed Users Page

   Add the ability to sort by user status (active, inactive, cannot edit & delete, cannot upload edit & delete) to the Managed User page in the Admin Console.

   13 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   1 comment  ·  Admin Console  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating
   not planned  ·  katiele responded

   We are re-designing the managed users page and will focus on adding advanced filtering of managed users by status as a follow up. Right now, releasing the re-design will be our first priority, so filtering by status is not on the near-term
   (6 month) roadmap. We will revisit this after we release the new page.

8. Enable selecting files stored in Box directly in File Requests

   Currently, file request links only allow you to upload files from local folders.
   This is convenient if you use Box Drive, but users who rely solely on the browser have to download files from Box and then re-upload them via the file request link.

   I would like the file selection for file requests to allow choosing not only folders on the PC, but also files already stored in Box directly from the browser interface.

   〈ファイルリクエストでBox内ファイルを直接選択可能にしたい〉
   現在、ファイルリクエストリンクでは、ローカルフォルダ内のファイルしかアップロードできません。
   Box Drive を利用している場合は便利ですが、ブラウザのみを利用するユーザーは、いったん Box からファイルをダウンロードしてから、ファイルリクエストリンクへ再度アップロードする必要があります。

   ファイルリクエストでアップロードするファイルの選択時に、PC上のフォルダだけでなく、ブラウザ画面から Box 内に保存されているファイルも直接選べるようにしてほしいです。

   •  

   12 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Other  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

9. Enable Box AI API for Specific Users or Groups

   Currently, the Box AI API can only be enabled or disabled for "all users" at once. To allow custom applications to use Box AI, we have to enable the API for every user in our tenant.

   However, it is difficult to estimate how many additional API Units we need to purchase, since we cannot predict how much each user will use the Box AI API. We are also concerned about users utilizing the AI API without proper authorization or oversight.

   Just like Box AI for Notes and Box AI for Hubs, we would like to be able to enable or disable the Box AI API for specific users or groups. This would allow us to manage access more flexibly and securely. We would appreciate your consideration of this feature.

   〈特定のユーザーまたはグループに対してBox AI APIを有効にする〉
   現在、Box AI APIは「すべてのユーザー」に対して一括で有効／無効を設定する仕様になっています。そのため、カスタムアプリでBox AIを利用できるようにしたい場合、全ユーザーに対してAI APIを有効化する必要があります。

   しかし、どのユーザーがどれくらいBox AI APIを利用するか事前に把握できず、API Unitの追加購入がどれほど必要か判断できません。また、意図しないユーザーが勝手にBox AI APIを利用してしまうリスクもあります。

   Box AI for NotesやBox AI for Hubsのように、Box AI APIも特定のユーザーやグループ単位で有効化／無効化できるようにしていただきたいです。

   Currently, the Box AI API can only be enabled or disabled for "all users" at once. To allow custom applications to use Box AI, we have to enable the API for every user in our tenant.

   However, it is difficult to estimate how many additional API Units we need to purchase, since we cannot predict how much each user will use the Box AI API. We are also concerned about users utilizing the AI API without proper authorization or oversight.

   Just like Box AI for Notes and Box AI for Hubs, we would like to be able to enable or… more

   12 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Box AI  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

10. We would like metadata to also be stored in the specified Zone.

    In Box Zones settings, content can be stored in the specified zone, but metadata is always stored in the United States.
    We would like metadata to be stored in the specified zone as well.

    Box Zonesの設定では、コンテンツは指定したZoneに保存できますが、メタデータは必ず米国に保存されます。
    メタデータも指定したZoneへの保存できるようにしたいです。

    12 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Metadata  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

11. Deleted Shared Link Lookup Tool

    In the same manner as below, we'd like the capability to search for disabled shared links as well. Currently, there's no way to locate files if the shared links have expired or become inactive.

    https://pulse.box.com/forums/909778-help-shape-the-future-of-box/suggestions/35982223-shared-link-lookup-tool

    12 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Web App  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

12. We would like the number of contents per hub to be displayed in the Box Hubs management function

    When using Box AI for Hubs, the current limit for the number of pieces of content that can be placed in one Hub is 10,000.
    We would like to be able to check this upper limit in the Hubs list in the administration console.

    Box AI for Hubsを利用するにあたり、1つのHubに配置できるコンテンツ数は現在10,000が上限です。
    その上限値が管理コンソールのHubs一覧で確認できるようにしてほしいです。

    12 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Box Hubs  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating
    on roadmap  ·  AdminAnonymous (Admin, Box) responded

    Hello! This functionality is already planned for development.

13. Box Drive: Safe Column Width Fixation

    The default column width is too narrow when viewing in Box Drive, and it is not possible to apply column width locking. I would like to request an improvement to this feature.

    12 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Box Drive  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

14. Added deletion counts to public Beta for Folder Insights

    The public beta version of Folder Insights does not provide insight into deletions made within folders.
    Until now, if a file was accidentally deleted, it was necessary to get an administrator report, which was a lot of work, but if Folder Insights can provide a report of deleted files, work will become smoother.
    I would like to be able to check the deletion information in the folder with Folder Insight.

    -in Japanese-
    ベータ版のフォルダインサイトではフォルダ内で行われた削除の情報が提供されていない。
    これまではファイルを誤削除してしまった場合、管理者にレポートを取得してもらう必要があり手間が発生していたが、
    フォルダインサイトから削除したファイルの情報を取得できれば作業がスムーズになる。
    フォルダインサイトでフォルダ内の削除情報を確認できるようにしてほしい。

    12 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  New UI  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

15. Expand 1000 character prompt limit

    The prompt limit of 1000 characters is way too small for anything but simple requests. Users are unable to feed in much additional data for comparison to the source document, greatly limiting the capability of the tool. Much better results are derived from loading the source document and any other required information into ChatGPT, with a larger and multimodal prompt.

    12 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Box AI  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

16. Request for improvement of the UI for granting permissions displayed on the content card in Box for Teams

    If you try to grant permission before sending a message, you will see the error message "Return to the main window to perform this action"
    We are aware that this behavior is documented in a support article.
    However, the permission prompts on the content cards are confusing because they seem to require immediate action to grant permissions.
    We would like to see the UI improved so that it is clear that permissions can only be granted after the message has been sent.

    　suggestion1：Display a message that lets users know that they cannot grant permission until after they send a message.
    　suggestion2：Display permission grant message in permission prompt on content card after sending message

    ＊Using Box for Teams：https://support.box.com/hc/en-us/articles/360044681474

    　「To Post a shared link from Box in a Teams Channel or Chat:」
    　4.You need to send the message before you can grant permissions. If you try to grant permissions before sending the message, an error message Return to the main window to perform this action appears.

    ＜Box for Teamsの、コンテンツカードに表示される権限付与のUI改善依頼＞

    メッセージ送信前に、権限を付与しようとすると、「メインウィンドウに戻って、この操作を実行してください。」というエラーメッセージが表示されます。
    この動作について、サポート記事に記載されていることは承知しております。
    しかし、コンテンツカードの権限のプロンプトでは、その場で権限付与の対応を求めているような表示であり、混乱します。
    メッセージの送信後でないと、権限付与ができないことが分かるように、UIの修正を希望します。

    　案1：メッセージ送信後でないと、権限付与ができないことが分かるようなメッセージを表示にする
    　案2：メッセージ送信後に、コンテンツカードの権限のプロンプトで権限付与のメッセージを表示する

    ＊Box for Teamsの使用：https://support.box.com/hc/ja/articles/360044681474

    　「TeamsチャネルまたはチャットでBoxの共有リンクを投稿する」
    　4.権限を付与する前に、メッセージを送信する必要があります。 メッセージの送信前に権限を付与しようとすると、メインウィンドウに戻って、この操作を実行してください。 というエラーメッセージが表示されます。

    If you try to grant permission before sending a message, you will see the error message "Return to the main window to perform this action"
    We are aware that this behavior is documented in a support article.
    However, the permission prompts on the content cards are confusing because they seem to require immediate action to grant permissions.
    We would like to see the UI improved so that it is clear that permissions can only be granted after the message has been sent.

    　suggestion1：Display a message that lets users know that they cannot grant permission until after they send a message.… more

    12 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Partner Integrations  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

17. Request for improvement to the number of users without access displayed on the content card in Box for Teams

    If the user has only been invited as a group, they will be counted and shown as "without access" even though they have access permissions because they are not a direct collaborator.
    We are aware that this behavior is documented in a support article.
    However, the display differs from the actual situation and may induce incorrect responses, as described below.
    Therefore, we would like to request a fix so that it shows the accurate number of users without access, whether they are direct collaborators or group collaborators.

    　ex）
    　1.Even though the target user has access rights as a group, there is a risk that the user may be deemed to not have access rights and may be given access rights again as an individual user.
    　2.Even if access rights are truly required, there is a risk that the current incorrect display of the number of users without access rights will lead to missed access rights being granted.

    ＊Using Box for Teams：https://support.box.com/hc/en-us/articles/360044681474

    　「Difference between Channels and Chats」
    　・In addition, the permissions prompt displays if other users in the chat already have access to the file through a user group, but are not direct collaborators on the file.

    ＜Box for Teamsの、コンテンツカードに表示される、アクセス権のないユーザー数の改善依頼＞

    グループとしてのみ招待されている場合、アクセス権限があるにもかかわらず、直接的なコラボレータではないため、「アクセス権がない」ユーザーとしてカウントされ、表示されます。
    この動作について、サポート記事に記載されていることは承知しております。
    しかし、実際の状況とは異なる表示となっており、以下のように誤った対応を誘発する可能性があります。
    そのため、直接的なコラボレータ、グループのコラボレータにかかわらず、アクセス権のないユーザーの正確な数を表示するよう、修正を希望します。

    　例）
    　1.グループとしてアクセス権があるのに、アクセス権がないものと判断し、ユーザーとして個別に再度アクセス権を付与してしまう。
    　2.本当にアクセス権の付与が必要な状態にもかかわらず、現状の誤った、アクセス権のないユーザー数の表示の影響、と誤認し、アクセス権付与の対応が漏れが発生してしまう。

    ＊Box for Teamsの使用：https://support.box.com/hc/ja/articles/360044681474

    　「チャネルとチャットの相違点」
    　・さらに、チャットの他のメンバーがすでにユーザーグループ経由でファイルへのアクセス権限を持っているものの、ファイルの直接的なコラボレータではない場合に、権限のプロンプトが表示されます。

    If the user has only been invited as a group, they will be counted and shown as "without access" even though they have access permissions because they are not a direct collaborator.
    We are aware that this behavior is documented in a support article.
    However, the display differs from the actual situation and may induce incorrect responses, as described below.
    Therefore, we would like to request a fix so that it shows the accurate number of users without access, whether they are direct collaborators or group collaborators.

    　ex）
    　1.Even though the target user has access rights as a group, there… more

    12 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Partner Integrations  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

18. Hubs - Provide ability to resize or select portion of the image used in Banner

    Can we have the option to resize the banner or click and drag to choose which portion of the image gets displayed?

    12 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Box Hubs  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

19. Ability to upload input spreadsheets to define source and target locations for Shuttle migrations

    In the admin console version of Shuttle, it can take up to 10 minutes to load accounts and folders that the migration job is planning to migrate into. This can lead to significant time to create a job and is quite manual.
    In the standalone version of Box Shuttle, you could upload a spreadsheet that includes the source location and where it would be migrated into Box. This bypassed the selection of users and folders that can take a long time for our largest customers.

    12 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Shuttle  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

20. Option to exclude files from files and folders report

    Ability to exclude files in the files and folders report. This will reduce the excel file size and loading time. Allowing for faster data analysis.

    12 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Admin Reports  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating