9637 results found

1. Allow Admin/Co-Admin to access shared link basic info

   When using BoxItem.Info itemInfo = BoxItem.getSharedItem(api, sharedLink); to retrieve basic information about a shared link, Box returns a 404 when the admin/co-admin doesn't have specific permissions. However, it's possible to see the basic information when you view a shared link report. We're essentially trying to get the same information as the shared link report is able to pull for all files/folders. Discussion of the suggestion is here:
   https://forum.box.com/t/add-ability-to-discover-basic-file-information-from-shared-link/2494

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Developer Platform  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

2. ARW

   I am currently using Box for our file storage and collaboration needs. I noticed that the ARW (Sony RAW image) file format is not currently supported for preview within Box. Could you please provide any information on whether there are plans to support ARW file previews in the near future? If so, could you share any anticipated timelines for this feature release?

   3 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   2 comments  ·  Preview  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

3. Would like the ability to create and format a simple Table within a Hub

   Would like the ability to create and format a simple Table within a Hub.
   Similar to what you can do with Box Notes currently

   10 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   1 comment  ·  Box Hubs  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

4. Allow list html tags in custom TOS.

   Please add the tags for <ol> <ul> and <li> in the TOS html so that we can properly format our TOS.

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Admin Console  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

5. Provide functionality to extend the 30 day time limit on user acceptance when enabling External User TOS

   Currently, the documentation states that when enabling external user TOS, if the user does not accept the TOS within 30 days then they have all access to collaborated content revoked. This is problematic as we have external users that need occasional access but may not heed the warning to accept the TOS. I would like a mechanism to manage this time frame, either extending to 90 days or reset the time for users/groups.

   Link to documentation: https://support.box.com/hc/en-us/articles/360044192733-Using-Custom-Terms-Of-Service

   If any external collaborators do not accept the ToS within 30 days, they will be removed as a collaborator from the content.

   2 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   1 comment  ·  Admin Console  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

6. Enforce a cc'd address on all sign requests
   4 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Box Sign  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

7. Ability to change Box Sign emails from automated Box to custom addresses
   4 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Box Sign  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

8. Create a 'my received docuemnts' folder
   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Collections  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

9. Sheild > [Download and Print Restriction], if "For Box Desktop" is enabled, the Office co-editing function should be available via a browser

   Sheild > [Download and Print Restriction], if "For Box Desktop" is enabled, the Office co-editing function should be available via a browser.

   We have applied Box Shield's [Download and Print Restriction] to "For Box Desktop" and [Microsoft Office Coauthoring Basics] via browser is also disabled.
   Microsoft Office Coauthoring Basics] via a browser is also disabled.
   Similarly, Office co-editing functions that are opened via a browser should not be restricted, since access in BoxEdit is not restricted.
   Errors in opening the file in the browser cause confusion for the user.
   Also, please add the following explanation to the Access Policy Settings screen for clarity until the modification.
   "For Box Web App" does not include web editing of [Microsoft Office Coauthoring Basics]

   Sheild > [Download and Print Restriction]において、”For Box Desktop”を有効化した場合、ブラウザ経由でOffice共同編集機能を利用可能とすべき

   Box Shieldのダウンロードと印刷の制限をデスクトップのみに適用するとブラウザ経由のOffice共同編集も使えなくなります。
   BoxEditでのアクセスは制限されないため同様にブラウザ経由で開くOffice共同編集機能を制限の対象外としてください。
   ブラウザで開いているのにエラーが生じることでユーザーに混乱をきたします。

   また、改修までは分かりやすくアクセスポリシーの設定画面に以下の説明を追記してください。
   「For Box Web App」には[Office共同編集機能]のWeb編集は含まれない

   Sheild > [Download and Print Restriction], if "For Box Desktop" is enabled, the Office co-editing function should be available via a browser.

   We have applied Box Shield's [Download and Print Restriction] to "For Box Desktop" and [Microsoft Office Coauthoring Basics] via browser is also disabled.
   Microsoft Office Coauthoring Basics] via a browser is also disabled.
   Similarly, Office co-editing functions that are opened via a browser should not be restricted, since access in BoxEdit is not restricted.
   Errors in opening the file in the browser cause confusion for the user.
   Also, please add the following explanation to the Access Policy Settings… more

   30 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   researching  ·  1 comment  ·  Shield  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

10. Box for Teams Content Card Support for Group Invites

    We have confirmed that when collaborating as a group rather than as a direct collaborator, the content card behaves differently than described in the article.
    After investigating with your company (Box), we were told that content card behavior for group invitations is not currently supported.
    Therefore, to avoid confusion for users, we would like you to take the following action.

    　【Requests】：
    　　1.The article should clearly state that the operation of content cards for group invitations is not currently supported.
    　　2.In the future, we would like to see content cards for group invitations also be supported.

    　【Target article】：
    　　Using Box for Teams：https://support.box.com/hc/en-us/articles/360044681474

    　【Checked behavior】：
    　　1.Content card not updating even after granting access permissions

    　　　Article Contents：
    　　　　To Post a shared link from Box in a Teams Channel or Chat:
    　　　　5.Once you grant the access, the card refreshes to show the content card with file details.

    　　　Actual behavior：
    　　　　When attempting to grant access, the message "Response sent to app" is displayed, but the card is not updated and the card for granting permissions remains displayed.
    　　　　*It has been confirmed that the posted Box shared link itself can be sent to the other party and that the other party has received it.。

    　　2.Even if the same operation is performed, the number of inaccessible chat members displayed on the content card may differ.

    　　　Article Contents：
    　　　　Difference between Channels and Chats
    　　　　・When sharing a file in a chat message, Box indicates the specific number of chat members who lack access (it does not indicate this in a channel message).
    　　　　 By granting members access to the file, you are making them collaborators (as compared to channel members, to whom you’re simply granting file access).
    　　
    　　　Premise：
    　　　　・The sender, recipient A, and recipient B belong to the same group.
    　　　　・All three were invited to the shared link folder as part of a group, and were not direct collaborators.
    　　　　・The group has editor privileges

    　　　Actual behavior：
    　　　　・When the sender sends a chat to recipient A: The content card displays the message "You cannot view this file shared by two users."
    　　　　・When the sender sends a chat to recipient B: The content card displays the message "You can't view this file shared by a user."

    ＜Box for Teamsのグループ招待時のコンテンツカードのサポートについて＞
    直接的なコラボレータではなく、グループとしてコラボレートされている場合、コンテンツカードで記事と異なる動作を確認しております。
    貴社（Box社）に調査いただいたところ、グループ招待のコンテンツカードの動作は、現状サポートされていない旨回答いただきました。
    そこでユーザーの混乱を招かないよう、以下ご対応いただきたく存じます。

    　【依頼事項】：
    　　1.グループ招待のコンテンツカードの動作は、現状サポートされていないことを記事に明記
    　　2.将来的にグループ招待のコンテンツカードもサポート対象とする

    　【対象記事】：
    　　Box for Teamsの使用：https://support.box.com/hc/ja/articles/360044681474

    　【確認している動作】：
    　　1.アクセス権限を付与してもコンテンツカードが更新されない

    　　　記事の内容：
    　　　　TeamsチャネルまたはチャットでBoxから共有リンクを投稿するには:
    　　　　5.アクセス権限を付与すると、カードは更新され、ファイルの詳細を含むコンテンツカードが表示されます。

    　　　実際の動作：
    　　　　アクセス権限を付与しようとすると「応答がアプリに送信されました」と表示されるものの、
    　　　　カードは更新されず、権限付与するためのカードが表示され続けたままの状態となる。
    　　　　※投稿したBoxの共有リンク自体は、相手方に送信でき、相手方も受信できていることを確認済み。

    　　2.同じ操作にもかかわらず、コンテンツカードに表示されるアクセスできないチャットメンバー数に差異が生じる場合がある

    　　　記事の内容：
    　　　　チャネルとチャットの相違点
    　　　　・チャットメッセージでファイルを共有すると、アクセスできないチャットメンバーの具体的な数が表示されます (これは、チャネルメッセージでは表示されません)。
    　　　 　ファイルへのアクセスをメンバーに許可すると、そのメンバーはコラボレータになります (チャネルメンバーの場合は、ファイルへのアクセスを許可するだけです)。
    　　
    　　　前提：
    　　　　・送信者、送信先A、送信先Bは、同一グループに所属している
    　　　　・3名とも共有リンクのフォルダにはグループとして招待されており、直接的なコラボレータではない
    　　　　・グループとして編集者権限はある

    　　　実際の動作：
    　　　　・送信者⇒送信先Aにチャットを送信した場合：コンテンツカードに「2人のユーザーが共有したこのファイルを表示できません」と表示される。
    　　　　・送信者⇒送信先Bにチャットを送信した場合：コンテンツカードに「1人のユーザーが共有したこのファイルを表示できません」と表示される。

    We have confirmed that when collaborating as a group rather than as a direct collaborator, the content card behaves differently than described in the article.
    After investigating with your company (Box), we were told that content card behavior for group invitations is not currently supported.
    Therefore, to avoid confusion for users, we would like you to take the following action.

    　【Requests】：
    　　1.The article should clearly state that the operation of content cards for group invitations is not currently supported.
    　　2.In the future, we would like to see content cards for group invitations also be supported.

    　【Target article】：
    　　Using Box for… more

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Partner Integrations  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

11. Push the recommended Hub

    In Box Hubs, we would like to have the ability to push high priority Hubs from the admin side.

    Currently, users have to click on the "Box Hubs" tab from the left side of the screen to get to each Hub.
    The name "Box Hubs" is not intuitive to the average user, so they almost never access it.
    This is the same as the "feeds" that were discontinued in beta.

    On the other hand, we would like to have the ability to push Hub recommendations to all managed users or specified gruop.
    Specifically, we have the following suggestions
    (1) Display the Hubs specified by the administrator in the menu on the left side of the screen. (Please avoid the specification that you have to click "▽", as in the case of collections.)
    (2) Thumbnail display of recommended Hubs in the place where "Recently accessed files" is currently displayed as thumbnails.

    If the names or thumbnails of specific Hubs, such as "Box Operation Manual" or "Company Regulations," are displayed in such a manner, the possibility of access will increase dramatically, and the value of using Hubs will be maximized.

    In Box Hubs, we would like to have the ability to push high priority Hubs from the admin side.

    Currently, users have to click on the "Box Hubs" tab from the left side of the screen to get to each Hub.
    The name "Box Hubs" is not intuitive to the average user, so they almost never access it.
    This is the same as the "feeds" that were discontinued in beta.

    On the other hand, we would like to have the ability to push Hub recommendations to all managed users or specified gruop.
    Specifically, we have the following suggestions
    (1) Display… more

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Box Hubs  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

12. Enable Sign request to have a different name than the file name

    When uploading or renaming a file, the name of the first file becomes the name of the request.
    In some cases we want to differentiate between the two since the file can be more generic and the request can be more personal, e.g. a contract template.
    We want to separate the file's name from the request name, making sure we propagate the request name to emails and signing logs.

    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Box Sign  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

13. Audit Log for Outbound Email Status

    Feature request to allow an audit log for outbound emails sent from Box (noreply@box.com).

    The problem: An external collaborator says they did not receive an email notification for an uploaded/edited file. The external collaborator has the proper Box email notification settings but did not receive an email from Box.
    Currently, there is no way for us to know with certainty that the email left Box's email server OR if there was an issue trying to send to the external collaborator (e.g. collaborator email is blacklisted due to previous bounces).

    We can't help clients with issues on receipt of an email, but currently we don't have a way of knowing with certainty our side (Box) didn't have any issues, either. We have to reach out to support.
    An audit log allows for client/customer self-service.
    A longer term solution could be for automated notifications sent to a Box admin for failed outbound emails.

    Proposed solution: Add a basic audit log for admins to export the email batch history (Box seems to have a 1 or 5 minute queue for outbound emails).
    Logically columns of the export would be:
    Batch ID (e.g. 39028)
    Email ID (e.g. 448737)
    Recipient (e.g. jeff.bezos@amazon.com)
    Email Result (e.g. Queued, Processing, Bounce Reason: Blacklist, Bounce Reason: Invalid email, Bounce Reason: DNS failure, Sent)
    Email Sent Time (e.g. 2024-07-12-090753 UTC)

    Feature request to allow an audit log for outbound emails sent from Box (noreply@box.com).

    The problem: An external collaborator says they did not receive an email notification for an uploaded/edited file. The external collaborator has the proper Box email notification settings but did not receive an email from Box.
    Currently, there is no way for us to know with certainty that the email left Box's email server OR if there was an issue trying to send to the external collaborator (e.g. collaborator email is blacklisted due to previous bounces).

    We can't help clients with issues on receipt of… more

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Admin Reports  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

14. Request for API Improvement (Folder Move API)

    In the folder move API, we would like you to add a function to set query parameters (force=true, etc.) to force execution.
    The intention is to be able to quickly and efficiently respond to the necessary operations in "exceptional cases" and "emergencies", ignoring the usual constraints,
    We request that it be introduced as a function in order to improve the efficiency of operational work by administrators.

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Admin Console  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

15. Request for additional enterprise setting items (moving across content owners)

    In the Enterprise settings, we believe that we need to have a feature that allows us to set an option that does not warn when moving across content owners.
    If you are caught by the information barrier limitation, "Stop at the warning display"
    If not, we would like to make it "movable without warning".
    In particular, we believe that this feature is useful for Box tenants with a closed configuration, so we request that it be introduced as a feature.

    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Admin Console  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

16. Download and Print restriction policy and Office co-authoring

    I have Office co-editing enabled on my device.

    An error appears when I try to edit an Office file from a web browser that has the file labeled with "Download and Print Restrictions Access Policy for Box Desktop" enabled.

    It's meant to be a label to disable BoxDrive, but I'm having trouble if I can't edit it from a web browser.

    Please enable Office co-authoring from a web browser, even if the file is labeled with these restriction.

    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Shield  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

17. Custom Columns (with sort) for Users and Groups

    Custom Columns (with sort) for Users and Groups

    The current Admin console defaults to the below columns with no way to customize for better productivity:
    Name
    Email
    User ID
    Role
    Status
    Storage Used

    This request would allow the Main admin account to customize which columns are displayed while looking at your Users and Groups page. These custom column choices can be chosen from the custom Tags (which are already a feature). Allowing important information to be seen at a glance rather than having to go into each user to get additional pertinent information.
    Some examples of custom columns may be:
    - Cost Center
    - Legal Hold
    - VIP

    Custom Columns (with sort) for Users and Groups

    The current Admin console defaults to the below columns with no way to customize for better productivity:
    Name
    Email
    User ID
    Role
    Status
    Storage Used

    This request would allow the Main admin account to customize which columns are displayed while looking at your Users and Groups page. These custom column choices can be chosen from the custom Tags (which are already a feature). Allowing important information to be seen at a glance rather than having to go into each user to get additional pertinent information.
    Some examples of custom columns may be: … more

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Admin Console  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

18. Setting Output Destination for Box Reports

    I want to be able to set the output destination folder name or file name for Box reports. Since it is necessary to regularly create activity logs for each team and project, I want to be able to distinguish which department or project the report belongs to by folder name or file name.

    Boxレポートの出力先フォルダ名かファイル名を設定できるようにしたい。チームや案件毎にアクティビティログを定期的に作成する必要があるため、フォルダ名やファイル名でどの部署や案件のレポートなのか区別できるようにしたい

    13 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Admin Reports  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

19. Issue with displaying list of invited collaborators

    Exposing the list of users collaborating on a folder to users from other companies could lead to a personal information leak. In the future, we would like to make the collaborator list invisible to users outside the company by default. We hope that this will be improved.

    in japanese
    フォルダにコラボレーションされたユーザー一覧が他社から見えてしまうと、個人情報漏えいに繋がります。
    将来的に、コラボレータ一の一覧が社外のユーザーからデフォルトで見えないようにしてほしいです。
    改善されることを期待しております。

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Web App  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

20. Super collections

    My workplace is too large to come up with reasonable startegies and Box is a bit chaotic. Collections and the My Collections view is a great way to keep my colleagues's work tidy, but it would be nice to have a hierarchy of collections and be able to have supercollections (i.e., collections of (super)collections).

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Collections  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating