669 results found

1. Make the Web App WCAG2 Level AA Compliant (eliminate need for a.box separate site)

   The current Box Web is not WCAG 2.0 Level AAA compliant currently, meaning users who require accessibility support need to use a.box. This is a subpar solution given that a.box is based on m.box which is missing large amounts of functionality that the full Web App provides.

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Web App  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   delivered  ·  AdminAnonymous (Admin, Box) responded

   Box Web App conforms to WCAG 2.0 Level AA.

2. Allow separate collaboration and shared link controls for Box Automate and AI Home

   Currently, the following Enterprise Setting controls both Box Automate workflow sharing and sharing of content located in AI Home session folders.

   Enterprise Settings > Content & Sharing > Additional Collaboration Configuration

   Our organization would like to apply different sharing policies to Box Automate and AI Home.

   Box Automate
   ・Allow workflows to be shared between managed users within our organization
   ・Prevent workflows from being shared with external users
   AI Home
   ・Prevent collaboration on content created or uploaded in AI Home session folders, including Notes containing saved AI responses, for both internal and external users
   ・Prevent shared links from being created for this content

   However, the current configuration requires us to choose between the following options:

   ・When “Restrict all collaboration and shared links” is selected, sharing of AI Home-related content can be restricted for both internal and external users, but Box Automate workflows cannot be shared with managed users.
   ・When “Restrict external collaboration and public shared links” is selected, Box Automate workflows can be shared with managed users, but internal collaboration on AI Home-related content remains available.

   As a result, we cannot implement our desired configuration:

   ・Box Automate workflows can be shared between managed users.
   ・AI Home-related content cannot be shared with either internal or external users.

   Box Automate and AI Home have different purposes and sharing requirements. To enable organizations to use Box Automate collaboratively while maintaining strict controls over AI Home-related content, we request separate administrative settings for the following:

   1.Sharing of Box Automate workflows
   2.Collaboration on content and Notes located in AI Home session folders
   3.Shared link creation for content and Notes located in AI Home session folders

   Our desired configuration is:

   ・Box Automate: Allow workflow sharing with managed users
   ・Box Automate: Prevent workflow sharing with external users
   ・AI Home-related content: Prevent collaboration with all users, including managed users
   ・AI Home-related content: Prevent shared link creation

   Separating these settings would allow organizations to securely collaborate on Box Automate workflows while continuing to restrict the sharing of AI Home-related content.

   現在、Enterprise設定の以下の項目により、Box Automateのワークフロー共有と、AI Homeのセッションフォルダ配下にあるコンテンツの共有が同一の設定で制御されています。

   Enterprise設定 ＞ コンテンツと共有 ＞ 追加のコラボレーション構成

   当組織では、以下のように機能ごとに異なる共有制御を行いたいと考えています。

   Box Automate
   ・管理対象ユーザー間でワークフローを共有可能としたい
   ・外部ユーザーへのワークフロー共有は許可しない
   AI Home
   ・セッションフォルダ配下に作成またはアップロードされたコンテンツ、およびAI回答を保存したNotesについて、組織内外を問わずコラボレーションを制限したい
   ・同コンテンツについて、組織内外を問わず共有リンクの作成を制限したい

   しかし、現在の設定では、以下のいずれかを選択する必要があります。

   ・「すべてのコラボレーションと共有リンクを制限する」を選択すると、AI Home関連コンテンツの組織内外への共有を制限できますが、Box Automateのワークフローも管理対象ユーザーへ共有できません。
   ・「外部のコラボレーションと公開共有リンクを制限する」を選択すると、Box Automateのワークフローを管理対象ユーザーへ共有できますが、AI Home関連コンテンツについても組織内でのコラボレーションが可能となります。

   このため、当組織が希望する以下の状態を実現できません。

   ・Box Automateのワークフローは、管理対象ユーザー間で共有可能
   ・AI Home関連コンテンツは、組織内外を問わず共有不可

   Box AutomateとAI Homeでは、共有を許可する目的や対象が異なります。セキュリティを維持しながらBox Automateを組織内で活用できるよう、以下の設定を分離し、それぞれ個別に制御できるようにしていただきたいです。

   1. Box Automateのワークフロー共有に関する設定
   2. AI Homeのセッションフォルダ配下にあるコンテンツおよびNotesのコラボレーションに関する設定
   3. AI Homeのセッションフォルダ配下にあるコンテンツおよびNotesの共有リンクに関する設定

   希望する設定例は以下のとおりです。

   ・Box Automate：管理対象ユーザーへの共有を許可
   ・Box Automate：外部ユーザーへの共有を禁止
   ・AI Home関連コンテンツ：管理対象ユーザーを含むすべてのユーザーへのコラボレーションを禁止
   ・AI Home関連コンテンツ：共有リンクの作成を禁止

   機能ごとに設定を分離することで、AI Home関連コンテンツに対する共有制限を維持しながら、Box Automateのワークフローを組織内で安全に共同利用できるよう、製品の改善を希望します。

   Currently, the following Enterprise Setting controls both Box Automate workflow sharing and sharing of content located in AI Home session folders.

   Enterprise Settings > Content & Sharing > Additional Collaboration Configuration

   Our organization would like to apply different sharing policies to Box Automate and AI Home.

   Box Automate
   ・Allow workflows to be shared between managed users within our organization
   ・Prevent workflows from being shared with external users
   AI Home
   ・Prevent collaboration on content created or uploaded in AI Home session folders, including Notes containing saved AI responses, for both internal and external users
   ・Prevent shared links from being created for… more

   3 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Box Automate  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

3. Google Doc "share" from google.

   When using V2 of the box integration with google docs, apparently the ability to "share" the document from google itself, was apparently removed (it shows as available at 1:05 of this box video https://support.box.com/hc/en-us/articles/360043696854-Inviting-Collaborators )

   Removing this functionality is not only cumbersome, it creates HUGE potential security issues.

   I would like users in our organization to be able to store these google documents in box, to avoid having to manage multiple file storage systems. For one thing, it is cumbersome and unintuitive to have to go to box to invite a person to collaborate with my google doc. And then for the user to have to go through box and then know to click to edit the file to get to the google doc. That's like having to go through your neighbor's house to get to your own refrigerator.

   But even worse, it creates HUGE potential security issues. In the real world, people often mistakenly invite "collaborators" to the wrong file. EASY to do when busily viewing a list of nearly identical documents in a box folder. OR worse, they invite collaborators to the entire folder and all its subfolders. Potentially CATASTROPHIC depending on the contents of those folders. This kind of thing happens in the real world, no matter how much you train them. Like I was saying above, I don't want users to go through the neighbor's house AT ALL. I just want to give them the soda or whatever I want them to have. which is not related to the neighbor's house at all. They have no business in the neighbor's house at all.

   When a user shares a google document from within the google interface, there is no mistaking which document is being shared. And there is no potential for sharing any other document or a whole directory of documents.
   
   Basically this new version of this integration REMOVES the very collaborative features of google docs, and adds a layer of complexity, along with a potential for massive mistakes ranging from problematic to disastrous.
   This integration as it is now, with regular google "sharing" removed, basically guarantees that we won't use it. There is virtually no upside and HUGE potential downsides.
   
   Honestly, I can't believe google even allowed their own "share" button to be removed from their premium suite of apps.
   
   It's a HUGE security and workflow oversite, done I can only imagine, to force people to go through and see box, even if that causes the previously listed gymnastics and potential debacles. Thus it seems it was done with marketing in mind, rather than a benefit to the users. This was incredibly shortsighted.
   
   As mentioned. We will NOT use this feature as is, for the potential security vulnerabilities alone. Thus the current implementation is driving us AWAY from box. Since we have to use google docs for these use cases.
   
   PLEASE revert the feature to enable the regular "share" functionality in Google apps.

   UPDATE: Actually it's worse than I thought. Just tested between two of my accounts. Since the "sharing" apparently only works by inviting "collaborator" as an editor, the user actually has to CREATE a box account just to edit the google sheet. I mean SERIOUSLY. What a ridiculous marketing move. Definitely will NOT use this integration as it is now. It's pretty much all downside, virtually no upside.
   If you want happy Box users, PLEASE don't do stuff like this. We like it when you HELP us. Not when you use us to be mules to market your platform to our business associates. I'd brag about you MORE (and have) if you just make my life easier. NOT when you do stuff like this. Just put it back the way it was.

   When using V2 of the box integration with google docs, apparently the ability to "share" the document from google itself, was apparently removed (it shows as available at 1:05 of this box video https://support.box.com/hc/en-us/articles/360043696854-Inviting-Collaborators )

   Removing this functionality is not only cumbersome, it creates HUGE potential security issues.

   I would like users in our organization to be able to store these google documents in box, to avoid having to manage multiple file storage systems. For one thing, it is cumbersome and unintuitive to have to go to box to invite a person to collaborate with my google doc. And then… more

   3 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Partner Integrations  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   delivered  ·  Adminkkung (Admin, Box) responded

   When using the integration, users can now share a Google file directly within the editor, using Box’s sharing modal permissions and settings.

4. box for office use several accounts

   I have 2 Box accounts and one instance of Outlook. It'd be very convenient to be able to download / upload using several accounts from Box for office (save attachments in Outlook, attach links, etc.).
   As an example, I have this ability with Adobe Acrobat in which my 2 accounts are linked.

   2 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Box for Office  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

5. Web Clipper

   As a user, I would like to bookmark or clip webpage into box. There are two issues on the current "Box Bookmark" as following.

   1. Box Bookmark needs 2 copy&paste motions (URL and Name) when trying to save a page
   2. Box Bookmark may be unaccessible when webpage is not available so it should give an option as a screenshot
   2 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Web App  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

6. Rollup secret for OAuth2 with client credentials.

   Please provide a way to update client_secret without any custom app service impact.
   With the current interface, issuing a new secret invalidates the previous one.
   Periodic updating of secret is a security best practice, but this is not possible with client credentials.

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Developer Platform  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

7. Add root level file path + end file path to search results (Root > 1 > 2 > 3....x+3 > x+2 > x+1 > x)

   Currently, when you search for an item in Box, the list of returns displays the last x amount of folders in the file path that fit in the screen. Understanding that showing the entire file path (though desired) would not be possible, it would be more helpful to show the first 3 folders starting from the root folder, and the last 3 folders from the bottom, to get a better idea of where this item lives. Due to large enterprises with multiple PB of content, only seeing the last 3 folders of the file path is not helpful enough.

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Search  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

8. When I number files in BOX, could box use the number to follow sequence instead of the name? Examlpe 1. January 2024, 2. February 2024,?

   When I number files in BOX, could box use the number to follow sequence instead of the name? Examlpe 1. January 2024, 2. February 2024,?

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Uploads  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

9. When going through pdf files. I don't want to have to always close the fact that the pdf is on two or more pages.

   When going through PDF files. I do not want to always have to minimize the 2 page PDF's.

   2 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Box Skills  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

10. ability to upload thumb for folders and links

    need to add capability to upload low res thumb jpgs for:
    1) Folders
    2) Bookmarks

    This need to work across all devices:
    1) Desktop browser
    2) Mobile
    3) App

    This needs to work on all platforms:
    1) Mac
    2) Windows
    3) apple and android

    THIS IS CRUCIAL EASY TO IMPLEMENT FEATURE THAT WILL DRAMATICALLY ENHANCE USER EXPERIENCE. IM A UX / UI CREATIVE DIRECTOR AND I KNOW IT WILL HELP ACROSS THE BOARD FOR MANY USE CASES AND MANY VARIOUS TARGET AUDIENCES.

    Thank you,
    Daria D.

    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Box Drive  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

11. Co-Admin actions in admin console should appear as part of the event stream

    1. When a Co-Admin kicks off a report in the admin console
    2. Anything related to impersonating a user (logging in as a user, emptying a users trash via content manager
    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    not planned  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin Console  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

12. Include HTTP Last-Modified / Current Version Header of Direct Link

    When you as a web client access to the direct link to a file in Box, the HTTP server responds only
    {...,
    Date=Sat, 09 Jul 2022 02:53:40 GMT,
    Expires=Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 GMT,
    ...},
    which does not include "Last-Modified" information.

    • Could "Last-Modified" be provided in the future?

    • Could "X-Box-File-Version" or something like this be provided in the future?

    • RFC: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7232#section-2.2

    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Web App  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

13. Ownership transfer status notification

    Transfer of ownership status notification for both accounts (Previous folder owner to New Owner).

    To check status of ownership transfer without creating a support ticket.

    Status Notification:
    1. Estimated time remaining
    2. Folder/File remaining
    3. Size remaining

    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Admin Console  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

14. Request to improve metadata_query limitation

    Metadata queries Limitations
    https://developer.box.com/guides/metadata/queries/limitations/

    When sending a metadata query request for which the result set exceeds 2,000 items, the API can only guarantee that it returns all all matching results if both the following conditions are met.
    1.The requesting user has at least ​Previewer ​permission to all items in the result set
    2.The ancestor folder contains all of the files in the result set

    With the above limitation, it is not possible to narrow down the search to metadata for a specific folder when the range of metadata assigned is wide.
    Could it be improved so that the number of items in the result set is counted after taking into consideration the narrowing down of folders?
    *Request is to remove the limitation of "2. The ancestor folder ~".

    When sending a metadata query request for which the result set exceeds 2,000 items and for which these conditions are not true, the API might return error with a 4XX response code indicating that the query will need to be restricted to return fewer results.

    Alternatively, could it be possible to relax the limit of 2,000 items, which is the number of result set items that could return the above error?

    == in Japanese ==
    metadata_queryの制限改善依頼

    メタデータクエリー制限
    https://ja.developer.box.com/guides/metadata/queries/limitations/

    結果セットの項目数が2,000を超えるメタデータクエリリクエストを送信した場合、
    APIは、以下の条件が両方とも満たされる場合に一致する結果をすべて返すことのみを保証できます。
    1.リクエストするユーザーが、結果セットに含まれるすべての項目に対してプレビューアー以上の権限を持っていること。
    2.先祖フォルダに、結果セット内のすべてのファイルが含まれていること。

    上記制限では、メタデータの付与範囲が広い場合、特定フォルダのメタデータを絞り込んで検索を行うことが出来ません。
    結果セットの項目数はフォルダの絞り込みを考慮した上でカウントされるよう改善できないでしょうか。
    ※要望としては「2.先祖フォルダに~」の制限撤廃

    結果セットの項目数が2,000を超えており、上記の条件が当てはまらないメタデータクエリリクエストを送信すると、
    APIは、返される結果が少なくなるようクエリを制限する必要があることを示すレスポンスコード4XXとともにエラーを返す可能性があります。

    または、こちらのエラーを返す可能性のある結果セット項目数である2,000件の制限を緩和できないでしょうか。

    Metadata queries Limitations
    https://developer.box.com/guides/metadata/queries/limitations/

    When sending a metadata query request for which the result set exceeds 2,000 items, the API can only guarantee that it returns all all matching results if both the following conditions are met.
    1.The requesting user has at least ​Previewer ​permission to all items in the result set
    2.The ancestor folder contains all of the files in the result set

    With the above limitation, it is not possible to narrow down the search to metadata for a specific folder when the range of metadata assigned is wide.
    Could it be improved so that the number of… more

    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Metadata  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

15. Extend Developer Token for Apps that Integrate with Box.com, the Current Toke has a Limit 2 Months

    Please add a new feature that allows us to change the expiration date of the Developer Token for apps that integrate with Box.com.

    We are currently using Splunk to collect logs from Box.com, but the token expires every 60 days, which is a ridicules short amount of time, and there is no option to extent it to a 365 days or 6 months, if we like.

    Please add this option, it is a pain to have to renew the token every 60 days. I have projects and other things that I need to work on, I should have to be renewing a token every 2 months.

    Thanks in advance.

    Please add a new feature that allows us to change the expiration date of the Developer Token for apps that integrate with Box.com.

    We are currently using Splunk to collect logs from Box.com, but the token expires every 60 days, which is a ridicules short amount of time, and there is no option to extent it to a 365 days or 6 months, if we like.

    Please add this option, it is a pain to have to renew the token every 60 days. I have projects and other things that I need to work on, I should have to be… more

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Developer Platform  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

16. End to end encryption for storage and shared links

    End-to-end encryption (E2EE) is one of the most popular security trends lately, and if Box offered this functionality, it would be very popular, especially for audiences who have a strong affinity for privacy and cryptography.

    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Security  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

17. file name order

    When I sort by file name. Why does it go by filename-1, filename-11, filename-12. Can we adjust it so it is sort filename sequence? filename-1, filename-2, filename-3

    •  

    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Content Manager  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

18. Limits for simultaneous file uploads and Batch processing capability

    I usually upload folders. Each folder could have 1 or 2 files, or 6 or 7 files, or more. When it's just 1 or 2, everything is fine, but when there are 4 or more, they seem to eat up my bandwidth. It would help if there was a limit within Box to control how many files upload simultaneously. Additionally, having a true batch process would be very helpful. That would allow me to line up several folders to upload and each one would upload in turn.

    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Workflow  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

19. iOS App: When "folder" is marked as offline, files in that folder doesn't get updated / downloaded automatically.

    In order to update the file(s), user needs to either:

    1) display the offline folder in Offline tab and manually tap "Update" link.

    2) Preview the file

    3) Close iOS App and relaunch

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Mobile  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating
    not planned  ·  Adminkmakmuri (Product Manager, Box) responded

    This feature is not planned for 2019.

20. Enable longer retention policies (Specifically 150 yr policy option)

    At USAA life Insurance we have many documents that need a longer retention policy of 150yrs and the longest you have available is 50 yrs. We have 2 million documents that we cannot apply a policy to because of this issue.

    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Governance  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating