9637 results found

1. Visualize the description field on the metadata input screen

   Visualize the description field on the metadata input screen

   Currently, when you open metadata attached to a file, the description field is not displayed and you cannot view it unless you hover the cursor over the item.
   When entering metadata, you want to refer to the description, so it is inconvenient that the description disappears when the cursor is not over it.
   I would like them to change it so that the description field is always visible to the user, like before.

   メタデータの入力画面で説明欄を可視化する

   現在、ファイルに付与されたメタデータを開くと説明欄が表示されておらず項目にカーソルを合わせないと確認ができません。
   メタデータの入力時は説明の内容を参考にしながら行いたいためカーソルを当てていないと説明表示が消えてしまうのは不便です。
   以前のようにユーザー側で説明欄が常に可視化されるように変更してほしいです。

   8 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Metadata  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

2. How to Prevent Content with Classification Labels from Being Published on Hubs

   We want to set up a system so that if a user tries to publish a folder or file with a specific classification label to Hubs, a warning message will appear or an alert will be sent to administrators.
   Within our company, we assign classification labels to content that is kept private except for specific users, and we are also careful when granting access permissions. However, if such content is published on Hubs, any user who can view the Hub will be able to access the content, which defeats the purpose. We want to be able to strictly manage the access permissions of content published on Hubs.

   In Japanese：
   〈分類ラベルが付与されたコンテンツをHubsに掲載させない方法〉

   ユーザーが特定の分類ラベルが付いたフォルダやファイルをHubsに掲載しようとした場合に、警告メッセージが表示されたり、管理者にアラートが送信されたりするようなシステムを導入したいです。

   社内では、特定のユーザー以外には非公開としているコンテンツに分類ラベルを付け、アクセス権の付与にも注意しています。しかし、そのようなコンテンツがHubsに掲載されてしまうと、Hubを閲覧できるユーザーは誰でもそのコンテンツにアクセスできてしまい、本来の目的が果たせなくなってしまいます。私たちは、Hubsに掲載されるコンテンツのアクセス権を厳格に管理できるようにしたいと考えています。

   We want to set up a system so that if a user tries to publish a folder or file with a specific classification label to Hubs, a warning message will appear or an alert will be sent to administrators.
   Within our company, we assign classification labels to content that is kept private except for specific users, and we are also careful when granting access permissions. However, if such content is published on Hubs, any user who can view the Hub will be able to access the content, which defeats the purpose. We want to be able to strictly manage the… more

   3 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Box Hubs  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

3. InTune MAM integration with Box issue

   When Mobile Application Management is enabled for Intune, if the default email address does not match the Intune email, then authentication fails, breaking authentication for all users.
   
   It seems a failover to the secondary email (which matches Intune) should be a given, and in my experience in product support should be quite easy to implement.
   Please add failover to the secondary email ID in authentication for MAM/Intune.

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Core & Technical Infrastructure  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

4. Let users use password managers

   Hey Box frontend developers,

   Your half-baked implementation of a password strength checker (e.g., zxcvbn or a custom regex), and then tying it to events like keyup, keydown, or input prevents users from using password managers. So now I'm using a really simple password that I can hand-type because you disallow pasting and (poorly) implement live re-validation.

   Congrats, your site is now less secure.

   2 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Security  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

5. Automatically add Office Online to a user's account when they attempting to open file there

   When users navigate to a file and attempt to open it via Office Online, if they don't already have the Office Online integration added, they are not prompted to manually add it (like a user is prompted to download Box Tools).

   Having a direct link to add box for office online so that users can themselves add this app like you see for Installing box tools will save users time, reduce internal IT tickets and requests for the admin to take care of, and allow for easier adoption of the integration by end users.

   4 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Partner Integrations  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

6. Support "Box Tools" on ARM, Snapdragon

   Support ARM, Snapdragon processors for "Box Tools" since many manufacturers are building devices using this CPU. The requirements listed in the Box Requirements article here; https://support.box.com/hc/en-us/articles/360043697634-Understanding-System-Requirements-to-Use-Box-Tools-v4
   Say nothing about the actual CPU only the OS, Browser. The Box downloads let you download the MSI installer but when you run it it gives an error..

   4 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Box Tools  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

7. Provide ability in Admin Console for Collaborating on Content > Incoming Invitations to be turned off for all users

   Provide capability in Admin Console for Collaborating on Content > Incoming Invitations to be turned off for all users rather than available by default in Account Settings at an individual user level

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Admin Console  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

8. Box Shield label error notification

   When there is an error to labelling Box Shield label there is no way for the user to know where there was an error or not unless looking at each content one by one.
   I would like to have a notification or some kind of alert to know if there is an error

   3 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Shield  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

9. Box Shield label error

   When applying Box Shield label currently the success rate is 90%
   I would like the success rate to be improved.

   3 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Shield  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

10. New Content Manager Feature Parity

    The new content manager UI could be improved by having the following features that were possible with the old content manager:
    - Folder Properties: For a folder, the old UI shows the number of collaborators, and lets you dive in (properties, general info) to see the size of the folder (in terms of storage).
    - Copy: The old UI lets you copy the name of the item (super-helpful).
    - File Properties and Version History: The old UI lets you see the version history and access stats for a file.

    I like the fact that the new UI searches Box Trash, and I prefer the way it shows collaborators (if you want see/modify the actual list).

    This feedback is from Stanford Medicine

    The new content manager UI could be improved by having the following features that were possible with the old content manager:
    - Folder Properties: For a folder, the old UI shows the number of collaborators, and lets you dive in (properties, general info) to see the size of the folder (in terms of storage).
    - Copy: The old UI lets you copy the name of the item (super-helpful).
    - File Properties and Version History: The old UI lets you see the version history and access stats for a file.

    I like the fact that the new UI searches Box Trash,… more

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Admin Console  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

11. Unsharing subfolder

    We should be able to remove access to a subfolder without it affecting access to the parent folder. I understand cascading permissions from parent folder > subfolder, but it definitely should not be the other way around. Currently, we have a parent folder with tons of different subfolders underneath and when we create a new private subfolder, rather than having to un-share the parent folder with someone and re-share all folders except the private one, we should just be able to un-share the private subfolder without taking away access to the entire parent folder. This is a huge time-eating hurdle for us, so if it were fixed it would be a big improvement!

    We should be able to remove access to a subfolder without it affecting access to the parent folder. I understand cascading permissions from parent folder > subfolder, but it definitely should not be the other way around. Currently, we have a parent folder with tons of different subfolders underneath and when we create a new private subfolder, rather than having to un-share the parent folder with someone and re-share all folders except the private one, we should just be able to un-share the private subfolder without taking away access to the entire parent folder. This is a huge time-eating hurdle… more

    •  

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Users and Groups  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

12. Ability to save audio recorded from "Capture Media" to device

    Currently, videos and photos taken with the mobile app's "Capture Media" can also be saved to the device.
    However, there is no function to save the recorded audio on the device.

    IIf you record important data that cannot be retrieved for business purposes and the upload fails, there is no way to salvage the data.
    Due to the risk of data loss, we request that a feature be implemented as soon as possible that allows recorded audio data to be saved on the device.

    (日本語訳)
    <メディアのキャプチャから録音した音声データをデバイスに保存する機能>
    現在、モバイルアプリの「メディアのキャプチャ」で撮影された動画と写真はデバイスに保存することができます。
    しかし録音した音声についてはデバイスに保存する機能はありません。

    業務上再取得が出来ない重要なデータを録音し、アップロードに失敗した場合に、データを救済する手段がありません。
    データ消失の恐れがあるため、録音した音声データをデバイスに保存する機能の早急な実現を要望します。

    4 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Mobile  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

13. Box Shield: Request to Filter Download Events Not Performed by Users in the EMM App

    Our company is doing restriction monitoring for Box Shield.
    Specifically, we are able to monitor via the Event API when operations subject to restriction by Box Shield Restrictions: “Download and Print Restrictions” are performed.
    Enterprise Event: "SHILEDOWNLOADBLOCKED"

    However, in the Box for EMM app, we have the following situation because of the following specifications.
    *The user's actual operation is not performed, and the “SHILEDOWNLOADBLOCKED” is obtained.
    *There is no way to distinguish between operations actually performed by the user and operations not actually performed by the user.

    Therefore, please improve the functionality so that download events that are not caused by user operations can be filtered.

    Close the application with “History” opened and displayed when accessed from Box for EMM.
    　2. The next time you launch the EMM application, “History” will open again.
    　3. At this time, the content is retrieved.
    　　However, the user does not actually perform the operation.
    　4. Although the user has not opened and previewed the file in question, the Event API judges it as a preview, and it is detected as “SHIELDDOWNLOADBLOCKED”.
    　　This operation is not logged in the user activity report because the user did not explicitly Preview the file.

    Translated with DeepL.com (free version)

    ＜日本語＞
    弊社では、Box Shieldの制限監視を行っています。
    具体的には、Box Shieldによる制限：「ダウンロードと印刷の制限」で制限の対象となる操作が行われた場合に、
    Event APIで監視できるようにしています。
    Enterprise Event："SHILEDOWNLOADBLOCKED"

    しかし、Box for EMMアプリにおいて、以下のような仕様があるため、次の状況になっています。
    *実際にユーザーが行っていない操作が"SHILEDOWNLOADBLOCKED"で取得されてしまいます。
    *ユーザーが実際に行った操作と、ユーザーが実際に行っていない操作を区別する方法がありません。

    よって、ユーザー操作起因ではないダウンロードイベントをフィルタできるように機能改善してください。

    　＜現在の仕様＞
    　①Box for EMMからアクセスした際に「履歴」を開いて表示した状態でアプリを閉じます
    　②次にEMMアプリを起動した際に再度「履歴」が開きます
    　③このとき、コンテンツの取得が行われます
    　　※ただし、ユーザは実際に操作を実施していません
    　④該当ファイルを開いてPreviewしていないが、Event APIではPreviewとして判断されてしまい、
    　　「SHIELDDOWNLOADBLOCKED」で検知されます
    　　※この操作は、ユーザーが明示的にPreviewしていないため、ユーザーアクティビティレポートにはログが記録されません

    Our company is doing restriction monitoring for Box Shield.
    Specifically, we are able to monitor via the Event API when operations subject to restriction by Box Shield Restrictions: “Download and Print Restrictions” are performed.
    Enterprise Event: "SHILEDOWNLOADBLOCKED"

    However, in the Box for EMM app, we have the following situation because of the following specifications.
    *The user's actual operation is not performed, and the “SHILEDOWNLOADBLOCKED” is obtained.
    *There is no way to distinguish between operations actually performed by the user and operations not actually performed by the user.

    Therefore, please improve the functionality so that download events… more

    4 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Shield  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

14. BoxAI citations should go to that part of the document on click

    The inline citations are nice, but often they just show the information on hover. Then I often need to find keywords and search through the document for added context. I'd prefer that if you click on a citation, the document on the left actually scrolls to that part of the document.

    5 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Box AI  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

15. Provide/enable a filter by Target User

    On-screen filters in Box Shield Dashboard, should include a filter for TARGET USER to enable all/selection of alerts related to person to be listed

    •  

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Shield  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

16. Ability to create custom Classification Label Data Types

    Have the ability to create a custom classification label data type, e.g. to recognise a particular number format such as xxxxx-xx-***-xxxxxxx-x

    This would enable us to classify documents containing particular account numbers or staff id numbers that don't match the current pre-built data types.

    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Shield  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

17. Addition report of additional information for functions

    Addition report of additional information for functions
    日本語：レポート機能における付帯情報の付与

    The format of file names and folder names in report output is created using a fixed wording.
    Because the report is not output immediately and is output periodically,
    I would like a function to add additional information so that I can understand what the intention was when outputting.

    Specifically, I think it would be good to do the following:
    - When outputting a report, add an arbitrary suffix to file and folder names to differentiate them.
    ・When outputting a report, provide a comment input field and add it to the description field (or tag) of the output folder so that it can be categorized.

    日本語：
    レポート出力でファイル名やフォルダ名の形式は一定の文言で作成されます
    レポートはすぐ出力されないことと定期的にしたりすることから、
    出力時にどのような意図で出力したのかわかるような付帯情報の付与機能追加をして欲しいです

    具体的には以下のようなことができればよいと考えます
    ・レポート出力時に、ファイル名・フォルダ名に任意の接尾文字を入れて区分けできるようにする
    ・レポート出力時に、コメント入力欄を設け、出力されるフォルダの説明欄（もしくはタグ）に付与されるようにして区分けできるようにする

    Addition report of additional information for functions
    日本語：レポート機能における付帯情報の付与

    The format of file names and folder names in report output is created using a fixed wording.
    Because the report is not output immediately and is output periodically,
    I would like a function to add additional information so that I can understand what the intention was when outputting.

    Specifically, I think it would be good to do the following:
    - When outputting a report, add an arbitrary suffix to file and folder names to differentiate them.
    ・When outputting a report, provide a comment input field and add it to the description field… more

    9 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Admin Reports  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

18. Pop up message when users try to move Large folders to a trash

    Hi Could you consider displaying a pop-up message when users try to move a lot of contents to a trash?

    Currently, a pop up message appears when large folders are moved to oher folders. But no message appears when a user tries to move contents to a trash.

    6 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Box Drive  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

19. Records management certificate of destruction

    In order to support a variety of compliant content management use cases, GxP validation, and fulfill various audit requirements, Box should provide business-centric proof that a record (one to many files with versioned metadata) has been properly disposed according to a retention schedule. Business leaders engaged in a GxP audit need more visibility into records beyond what is available in technical solutions like the Event Stream API and / or Box admin-level reporting.

    15 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Governance  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

20. Prevent file duplication when using template and file replacement

    Box Sign allows the creation of templates that replace the underlying document within a signature request / template while keeping the existing field placeholders in place.
    However, using a different document than the pre-set document will result in duplicate files identical to the original document in the destination folder of the Sign document.
    This means that one unnecessary file is generated each time the template is used once.
    If a template is used 100 times, there can be as many as 100 unnecessary files!
    Of course, this will not occur if no files are replaced. However, it is common to replace an existing document with another and use the Sign template.

    What we really need is a Sign template with the following items set without the documents.
    -Signatures & Fields
    -Recipients
    -The save location

    *The save location should be freely specified, not be the same as the template storage folder.

    In Japanese：
    Signでは、既存のフィールド・プレースホルダーを保持したまま、署名リクエスト/テンプレート内の基礎となるドキュメントを置き換えるテンプレートを作成することができます。
    しかし、事前にセットされたドキュメントとは異なるドキュメントを使用することで、保存先フォルダに元の文書と同じファイルが重複して作成されます。
    これは、テンプレートが1回使用されるたびに、不要なファイルが1つ生成されることを意味します。テンプレートが100回使用されれば、不要なファイルは100個にもなります！
    もちろん、ファイルを置き換えない場合はこのようなことは起こりません。しかし、既存の文書を別の文書に置き換えてSignテンプレートを使用することは一般的です。

    本当に必要なのは、ドキュメントファイルは無しで以下の項目がセットされたSignテンプレートです。
    ・署名フィールド
    ・受取人（リクエスト送信先）
    ・保存場所（ドキュメント格納先）

    ※保存場所は、テンプレートの保存フォルダと同じにするのではなく自由に指定できるようにするべきです。

    Box Sign allows the creation of templates that replace the underlying document within a signature request / template while keeping the existing field placeholders in place.
    However, using a different document than the pre-set document will result in duplicate files identical to the original document in the destination folder of the Sign document.
    This means that one unnecessary file is generated each time the template is used once.
    If a template is used 100 times, there can be as many as 100 unnecessary files!
    Of course, this will not occur if no files are replaced. However, it is common to… more

    39 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    gathering feedback  ·  4 comments  ·  Box Sign  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating