9635 results found

1. The upper limit on the number of file requests that can be "bulk deleted"

   Due to Box's specifications, you can delete file requests all at once using the following steps.
   However, if you try to delete nearly 1,000 file requests, you'll receive the error message "Failed to delete link." The following steps prevent you from deleting them.

   　[Admin Console > Content > File Requests > Select multiple file requests > Click the trash can icon that appears]

   For security reasons, we need to periodically delete large numbers of file requests to prevent unnecessary requests from being available for a long period of time.
   However, currently, the only way to delete nearly 1,000 file requests is to delete them in parts.
   This requires a lot of time and effort, so we'd like the limit on the number of file requests that can be deleted at once to be increased.

   【日本語訳】
   タイトル：ファイルリクエストを一括削除できる件数を増やしてほしい

   内容：
   Boxの仕様上、ファイルリクエストを一括削除する方法として、以下の操作手順でファイルリクエストを削除できますが
   1000件近いファイルリクエストを削除すると、エラー「リンクの削除に失敗しました。」が表示されて削除できません。
   【管理コンソール>コンテンツ>ファイルリクエスト>ファイルリクエストを複数選択>表示されるゴミ箱をクリック】

   セキュリティの観点から、不要となったファイルリクエストを長期間利用できないようにするため、定期的に大量のファイルリクエストを削除する必要があります。
   現状では1000件近いファイルリクエストを分割して削除する方法しかありません。
   管理する上で多くの工数がかかるため、ファイルリクエストを一括削除できる件数の上限を上げてほしいです。

   Due to Box's specifications, you can delete file requests all at once using the following steps.
   However, if you try to delete nearly 1,000 file requests, you'll receive the error message "Failed to delete link." The following steps prevent you from deleting them.

   　[Admin Console > Content > File Requests > Select multiple file requests > Click the trash can icon that appears]

   For security reasons, we need to periodically delete large numbers of file requests to prevent unnecessary requests from being available for a long period of time.
   However, currently, the only way to delete nearly 1,000 file requests… more

   8 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Admin Console  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

2. We’d like to be able to preconfigure/customize the watermark applied by access policies.

   We’d like content that has a watermark applied using Box Shield classification labels to display a preconfigured custom watermark.For example, content labeled “Confidential” should display a watermark with the text “Confidential.”
   Ideally, the watermark could be customized when configuring the security controls, without requiring per-item settings.

   Box Shieldの分類ラベルを使用して電子すかしを適用したコンテンツに対し、予めカスタマイズした電子すかしを表示して欲しいです。
   たとえば、「極秘」の分類ラベルを付与したコンテンツには電子すかしで「極秘」の文字列が出るようにしたいです。
   個別に設定をせずとも、セキュリティコントロールの設定時に電子すかしをカスタマイズできるのが望ましいです。

   9 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Shield  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

3. form submission export

   Box forms submissions should be available via export/report to show each submission and it's form responses, as well as info about the submission (who was it by, when, etc.). This would help with tracking specific forms and reflect functionality with similar products.

   14 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   under consideration  ·  1 comment  ·  Box Forms & Doc Gen  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

4. Automating Document Creation via Dynamic Table Generation with Forms & Doc Gen

   [Request]
   Enable Dynamic Table Generation When Creating Documents with Forms + Doc Gen

   [Customer Use Case]
   The headquarters IT department wants to automate the monthly task of issuing invoices for system usage fees to the group’s local subsidiaries.

   [Customer Needs]
   They want to implement the following workflow as a web-based solution without custom development.

   1. Enter invoice data per subsidiary via Forms
   2. Generate the invoice with Doc Gen
   3. Send a signature request to the manager via Box Sign
   4. After the manager signs, move the document to the shared folder with the local subsidiary

   At present, this could be achieved by using the Doc Gen API, but that would require application development, which is a significant hurdle for the customer.

   If the above can be done on the web without custom development, they believe it could be reused in other scenarios and accelerate broader business process automation.

   =====================================================
   [要望]
   Forms + Doc Gen でドキュメント生成する際に動的なテーブルを生成できるようにしてほしい。

   ［顧客のユースケース］
   本社 IT 部門が、グループ内の現地法人に対してシステム利用料の請求書を毎月発行する作業を自動化したい。

   ［顧客のニーズ］
   以下の業務プロセスをカスタム開発なしの Web ベースのワークフローとして実現したい。

   1. Forms で法人ごとに請求書データを入力
   2. Doc Gen で請求書を生成
   3. Box Sign で上司に署名リクエストを送信
   4. 上司の署名完了後、現地法人との共有フォルダにドキュメントを移動

   現状、Doc Gen API を使えば実現可能だが、アプリケーション開発が必要になり、顧客にとってハードルが高い。
   上記が Web ベースで実現できれば、他の業務シーンにも横展開でき、顧客の業務自動化を加速できると考えている。

   [Request]
   Enable Dynamic Table Generation When Creating Documents with Forms + Doc Gen

   [Customer Use Case]
   The headquarters IT department wants to automate the monthly task of issuing invoices for system usage fees to the group’s local subsidiaries.

   [Customer Needs]
   They want to implement the following workflow as a web-based solution without custom development.

   1. Enter invoice data per subsidiary via Forms
   2. Generate the invoice with Doc Gen
   3. Send a signature request to the manager via Box Sign
   4. After the manager signs, move the document to the shared folder with the local subsidiary

   At present, this could be achieved by using… more

   8 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Box Forms & Doc Gen  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

5. Box Forms – Add internal-only / scoped access controls for Form links (security & compliance)

   Customers need the ability to restrict Box Form links to internal, authenticated users (and ideally specific users/groups), instead of only “anyone with the link.” Current behavior conflicts with stricter security postures and makes Forms hard to adopt for internal project and regulated use cases.

   Background / Use Case
   Customer is using Box Relay + Box Forms as part of internal project workflows:

   Workflow trigger: Form submission (Relay)

   Outcome: e.g., DocGen or other internal automation

   They want to present Forms to internal project teams only and treat them as an internal front end to Box workflows.

   Today, the Form sharing model exposes a shared link that can be configured at admin level to allow “anyone with the link” or require a Box login, but there is no way to scope the Form link to:

   “People in your company” only, or

   A specific set of users / groups, similar to folder and file sharing.

   Customers need the ability to restrict Box Form links to internal, authenticated users (and ideally specific users/groups), instead of only “anyone with the link.” Current behavior conflicts with stricter security postures and makes Forms hard to adopt for internal project and regulated use cases.

   Background / Use Case
   Customer is using Box Relay + Box Forms as part of internal project workflows:

   Workflow trigger: Form submission (Relay)

   Outcome: e.g., DocGen or other internal automation

   They want to present Forms to internal project teams only and treat them as an internal front end to Box workflows.

   Today, the Form sharing model… more

   5 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Box Forms & Doc Gen  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

6. Do not send notifications to group members when inviting a group to Hubs, as is the case when inviting a group to a folder.

   Currently, when you invite a group to Box Hubs, all group members receive a notification.
   However, if there are many group members, if all group members receive the email, it may violate some rules of Exchange Online.
   Therefore, I would like to see an improvement so that notifications are not sent to group members when inviting a group to Hubs, as is the case when inviting a group to a folder.
   ーーーーーー
   ＜フォルダへのグループ招待時のようにHubsへのグループ招待時もグループメンバーへの通知を送信しない＞
   現在Box Hubsでグループを招待すると、グループメンバー全員に通知が届きます。
   しかし、グループメンバーが多い場合、グループメンバー全員がメールを受信すると、受信するExchange Onlineの何らかのルールに抵触する可能性があります。
   そのため、フォルダへのグループ招待時のように、Hubsへのグループ招待時もグループメンバーへの通知が送信されないように改善してほしいです。

   17 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   1 comment  ·  Box Hubs  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

7. Increase Multi-Document Querying Limitations from 10

   The current system limits the number of documents that can be reviewed in a single session, which has led some public sector users to process eligibility documents in multiple smaller batches. In practice, screenings often involve significantly more documents (70 in some cases) than the system currently supports in one batch (10 max), resulting in added workload and inefficiency.

   14 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Box AI  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

8. WithSecure

   We would like to request that WithSecure Elements EPP for Computers be added to the Device Trust supported antivirus/endpoint protection product list.

   5 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Security  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

9. Showcase thumbnail teams when a file is uploaded via Teams drag & drop

   Thumbnail previews in Microsoft Teams integration with Box are currently limited to items shared from Box (either through a shared link or the "Share from Box" content picker button), but not on the Upload from desktop functionality within Teams.
   When a file is uploaded via Teams (and a lot of our users use Drag & Drop) the thumbnail preview should be possible

   5 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Partner Integrations  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

10. Add Support for Surrogate Pair Characters (e.g. Emojis, Supplementary Kanji)

    Currently, Box has limitations in handling surrogate pair characters (such as certain emojis or supplementary Kanji) in file names and metadata.
    Other major services like Microsoft 365 already support these characters, and we would like to request similar support in Box.
    Enabling surrogate character support would significantly improve internationalization and user experience for customers working with multilingual or symbol-rich content.

    17 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Core & Technical Infrastructure  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

11. We want to use "YYYY MM DD" format for Box Relay date variables

    When entering dates as variables in Box Relay, it is inconvenient that the only formats available are "MM YYYY" or "MM DD YYYY".
    We would like to be able to enter the date in the "YYYY MM DD" format.

    Box Relayの日付変数の形式に「YYYY MM DD」を使いたい

    Box Relayで日付を変数で入力する際に、「MM YYYY」や「MM DD YYYY」のなどの形式しかないのは不便です。「YYYY MM DD」の形式でも入力できるようにしてほしい。

    20 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Workflow  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

12. We want to change the owner of a file in the trash

    There is some content that we do not want to completely erase, but we would like to change the owner due to capacity issues.
    Therefore, we would like to change the owner of the files in the Recycle Bin.

    ごみ箱内のファイルを所有者変更したい

    完全消去はしたくないコンテンツですが、容量の問題で所有者を変更したいコンテンツがあります。
    そのため、ごみ箱内のファイルについて、所有者変更がしたいです。

    18 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Admin Console  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

13. Signer to add fields to the signature request additionally to those added by sender

    When using BoxSign, there are many cases where the requester will add additional fields.
    In such a situation, there are times when signers themselves would like to add new fields, but they are unable to do so, and many voices are voicing concerns about the lack of convenience across the company.
    We would like to request the implementation of this feature to improve convenience.

    BoxSignを使用する際に署名リクエスト者がフィールドを追加するケースが多々あります。
    その状況下で署名者自身でも新たなフィールドを追加したい時がありますが、追加することできず社内全体で利便性に欠けている声が多く上がっています。
    利便性向上のため本機能の実装をお願いしたいです。

    6 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Box Sign  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

14. Increased Character Limit - Box Forms

    Please increase character limit to 1000 for Box Forms long text. We have questions in surveys that we are looking to send out via Box Forms that exceed the current, 100-character limit.

    •  

    9 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Box Forms & Doc Gen  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

15. Merge PDFs generated when uploading with Box Sign

    Every time you upload a file to Box Sign, a PDF file is generated, which can make the data cluttered.
    Is it possible to make it so that only the final combined data is generated as a PDF file?
    -in Japanese-
    Box Signでファイルをアップロードするごとにpdfファイルが生成されるのでデータが煩雑になってしまいます。最終的な結合データのみpdfファイルとして生成する仕様にできないでしょうか。

    10 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Box Sign  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

16. Request new report by file extension

    While you can check rough file types from the storage in admin insights, there are many situations in operations where you need to understand capacity and file counts at the extension level. I would like to request a report that can show file sizes by extension. I also want it to support filtering by owner.

    管理者インサイトのストレージから大まかなファイルタイプを確認できますが、運用では拡張子の粒度で容量や件数を把握したい場面が多くあります。拡張子ごとのファイルサイズを確認できるレポートの提供を希望します。所有者ごとのフィルタリングにも対応してほしいです。

    5 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Admin Reports  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

17. Add Box Hubs to mobile app

    Can Box Hubs be added to the mobile app, or is that in the roadmap already?

    22 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    4 comments  ·  Box Hubs  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating
    on roadmap  ·  AdminAnonymous (Admin, Box) responded

    This feature will be delivered in Q2 (next quarter)

18. Hubs permission model should be more granular

    Currently in the Box Hubs Beta, all collaborators invited into a Hub receive the "Viewer" permission on files and folders linked in the Hub. This does not allow for Hub content to be view-only and block downloading of content. Alternative methods of managing this such as rolling out classification policies would not be scalable as Hubs usage grows. It would be great if Hubs collaboration could be more granular and there was an ability to invite users or groups into a Hub with other permissions such as "Previewer" so they are more restricted on what they can do after accessing content.

    Currently in the Box Hubs Beta, all collaborators invited into a Hub receive the "Viewer" permission on files and folders linked in the Hub. This does not allow for Hub content to be view-only and block downloading of content. Alternative methods of managing this such as rolling out classification policies would not be scalable as Hubs usage grows. It would be great if Hubs collaboration could be more granular and there was an ability to invite users or groups into a Hub with other permissions such as "Previewer" so they are more restricted on what they can do after accessing… more

    122 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    4 comments  ·  Box Hubs  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating
    under consideration  ·  AdminAnonymous (Admin, Box) responded

    Hello! Changing status on this feature as we have it in our roadmap but we plan to make it in 2-3 quarters. We will keep you updated.

19. Increased file limit for Box AI for Hubs

    Currently, Box AI for Hubs is limited to 10,000 files per hub and 1,000,000 files combined across all hubs in an tenant.
    For use cases such as distributing hubs on a departmental basis, this number is low, so we would like the limit to be relaxed.

    Box AI for Hubsのファイル数制限を緩和してほしい

    現在Box AI for Hubsを利用するには、1つのHubで10,000ファイル、テナント内すべてのHubで合計1,000,000ファイルまでが上限となっています。
    部署単位でHubを配るといったユースケースでは、この数値では少ないため制限を緩和してほしい。

    56 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    researching  ·  3 comments  ·  Box AI  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

20. Deleted Shared Link Lookup Tool

    In the same manner as below, we'd like the capability to search for disabled shared links as well. Currently, there's no way to locate files if the shared links have expired or become inactive.

    https://pulse.box.com/forums/909778-help-shape-the-future-of-box/suggestions/35982223-shared-link-lookup-tool

    12 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Web App  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating