9944 results found

1. Enable "Searching" within Box Drives when using Microsoft File Explorer.

   Enable "Searching" within Box Drives when using Microsoft File Explorer.

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Search  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

2. Remember Fields Size Preferences

   Almost every document I create, I have to resize the signature box to the smallest height allowed and resize the date box and font size to much smaller. I would like a way to set user preferences for this issue.

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Box Sign  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

3. Extending the expiration date of invitation emails

   I work at a university and issue Box accounts to over 1500 new students every year.

   New students have a very large number of procedures to complete upon enrollment, making it difficult for them to sign in to Box within two weeks of enrollment. As a result, many invitation emails expire.

   The two-week deadline for invitation emails is too short and insufficient.

   Please either set the default expiration date to around one month, or allow administrators to set the expiration date themselves.

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Users and Groups  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

4. app.box.com website prompting for access without enumerating the specific apps and services it wishes to access

   Currently app.box.com prompts for access to...something, without expounding on what, precisely, it wants access to.

   I cannot, via policy, give blind access to things without proper enumeration of what, specifically, will be accessed.

   Please adjust this to list specifically what is being requested, if not in the popup itself then via an opt-in option on the site.

   Edge 146.0.3856.109

   •  

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Web App  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

5. Moving / Copying data - give users the option to set default sort order

   When moving or copying files in the web interface, the move to location is defaulting to strange behaviour which doesn't show recent folders ...

   The move / copy to dialogue should show all the folders in the user's Box area so that they can select the correct folder for the destination for the moving / copying of files.

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Core & Technical Infrastructure  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

6. Provide a solution to existing users to migrate their data to Box as Box Shuttle is restricted to tenant level

   We are seeking an effective solution for user data migration. At present, Box Shuttle operates at the tenant level with a current subscription limit of 10TB. However, from the end user's perspective, it would be advantageous to implement data caps at the individual account level. This adjustment would enable users to migrate their personal data from various storage sources directly to Box.

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Shuttle  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

7. Make the "Mobile Web Access Control" setting in the management console applicable to the current domain (box.com) as well

   As a result of Box consolidating its mobile sites from “a.box.com” and “m.box.com” into “box.com,” the “Mobile Web and Accessibility” settings in the Admin Console are not being applied to the current domain. Consequently, even if administrators enable these controls, they do not affect mobile access under box.com.
   At our company, we use Intune policies to prevent Box files from being saved locally on corporate iPhones. Safari is not subject to Intune policies. Because the “Mobile Web Access Control” settings currently cannot enforce restrictions, users can access Box via Safari on corporate iPhones and save Box files locally, creating a risk of corporate information being taken off the device and potential data leakage. In addition, this breaks alignment with existing controls provided by Box—such as EMM management, Device Trust, and Conditional Access—impacting the overall consistency of Box’s security design.
   We use Box as a secure, enterprise-grade storage solution. Inconsistencies in security settings affect Box’s trustworthiness within our organization, so we request a prompt remedy.

   【日本語】
   管理コンソールの「モバイルWebアクセス制御」設定を現行ドメイン（box.com）にも適用可能にする

   Box社がモバイルサイトを「a.box.com」「m.box.com」から「box.com」に統合した結果、管理コンソール上の「モバイルWebアクセス制御」設定が現行ドメインに反映されていません。
   このため、管理者が制御設定を有効化しても、box.com配下のモバイルアクセスには効果が及ばない状態です。

   弊社では、Intuneポリシーにより、Boxファイルが社用iPhoneのローカルに保存されないよう制御しています。
   SafariはIntuneポリシーの適用外です。現状「モバイルWebアクセス制御」設定による制御ができないため、
   社用iPhone内SafariからBoxにアクセスし、Boxファイルをローカルに保存できてしまい、社内情報が持ち出され、情報漏洩の発生しかねない状況です。
   また、Boxが提供しているEMM管理・デバイストラスト・条件付きアクセス等の既存制御との整合性が崩れ、Box全体のセキュリティ設計の一貫性にも影響が出ます。
   弊社はBoxを安全な企業向けストレージとして利用しております。セキュリティ設定の不整合は社内におけるBoxへの信頼性にも影響しますので、いち早く改善いただきたく思います。

   As a result of Box consolidating its mobile sites from “a.box.com” and “m.box.com” into “box.com,” the “Mobile Web and Accessibility” settings in the Admin Console are not being applied to the current domain. Consequently, even if administrators enable these controls, they do not affect mobile access under box.com.
   At our company, we use Intune policies to prevent Box files from being saved locally on corporate iPhones. Safari is not subject to Intune policies. Because the “Mobile Web Access Control” settings currently cannot enforce restrictions, users can access Box via Safari on corporate iPhones and save Box files locally, creating… more

   4 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Admin Console  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

8. Multiple Metadata Template Search Views

   Allow Search Views to be built that search across more than one metadata template so that queries and conditions across metadata attributes from multiple templates can be used all in one view.

   15 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   on roadmap  ·  0 comments  ·  Box Apps  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

9. Add Categories or Tags to Organize AI Agents in Box AI Studio

   The ability to create AI agents in Box AI Studio is extremely useful. However, as the number of AI agents increases, it becomes increasingly difficult to find the right agent when using Box AI.

   I would like to request a feature that allows users to better organize and find their AI agents. Possible solutions could be:
   - Allowing users to assign categories to AI agents, which could also be arranged in a hierarchical structure
   - Enabling the addition of multiple tags to each AI agent, along with the ability to filter or search by these tags

   In short, I hope you can provide an efficient way to categorize, tag, or otherwise manage AI agents, so that they can be easily found, especially as their number grows.

   The ability to create AI agents in Box AI Studio is extremely useful. However, as the number of AI agents increases, it becomes increasingly difficult to find the right agent when using Box AI.

   I would like to request a feature that allows users to better organize and find their AI agents. Possible solutions could be:
   - Allowing users to assign categories to AI agents, which could also be arranged in a hierarchical structure
   - Enabling the addition of multiple tags to each AI agent, along with the ability to filter or search by these tags

   In short,… more

   7 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   1 comment  ·  AI Studio  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

10. While in Outlook, the ability to drag & drop files directly into Box folders - not via the Box Web App, directly from Outlook

    Insurance companies still heavily rely on working with emails. The current Box for Outlook integration is one way, ie. you can share documents out from Outlook.
    Insurance companies require the ability to drag and drop files directly from Outlook into Box files without leveraging the Box Web App.

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Box for Office  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

11. Cannot select text in Box preview screen

    When previewing a file, attempting to select text within the file results in a state where a yellow frame is being specified instead, making it impossible to select the text. I would like this to be fixed so that text selection is possible.
    ＝＝＝
    ファイルをプレビューした際、ファイル内のテキストを選択しようとしても黄色の枠を指定する状態となりテキストの選択が行なえないので、選択できるよう改修を希望します。

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Web App  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

12. Allow folder recursion of checkbox unticking of "Only folder owners and co-owners can sent collabator invites"

    The behavior when unsetting the "Only folder owners and co-owners can sent collabator invites" is unpredictale. When unticking the checkbox at a high folder level, it may or may not propagate to enclosed folders in the so-called waterfall method like folder permissions do. Some folders will reflect the checkbox being unticked, while others will not. The only way to be sure currently is to manually traverse each subfolder and untick as needed.

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Web App  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

13. Support for Pasting Multiple Email Addresses in Box Hubs and Box AI Features

    When selecting “Enable for selected users and groups,” I noticed that the text area for entering email addresses does not support pasting multiple email addresses at once. Currently, it requires entering each address individually, either by typing or pasting one by one, which is time-consuming when enabling the feature for multiple users.

    Would it be possible to enhance this functionality to allow pasting multiple email addresses at once, similar to how collaborators can be invited to folders?

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Box AI  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

14. Quota Storage reporting

    We have implemented Storage Quotas for our users and need a way to view if users are reaching their quotas. The only current way we have of doing this is doing a Users Details report and comparing the Storage Used and Storage Allocated fields. Have a dedicated Storage Quota report that shows percentage used and even projected dates for running out of space would be nice.

    4 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Other  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

15. Box AI Q/A on a folder

    Currently, if you want to use Q/A on multiple files, you need to be able to select each file or put the content in a hub. It would be good if we were able to use Box AI with a selected folder(s) as context instead of just files.

    9 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    on roadmap  ·  0 comments  ·  Box AI  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

16. Request to add a function to select target items for output in the Shared Link Report

    In the current Shared Link Report filters, it is not possible to specify the targets of the output items, such as files, folders, or Hubs.
    Since all shared link information is output, there are many items, and extracting the necessary information takes a significant amount of time.

    To reduce operational workload when performing an inventory of Box Hub shared links, we would like the ability to limit the output items to Hubs only.
    Therefore, we request the addition of a feature in the Shared Link Report filters that allows users to select the target types of items to be included in the output.

    （日本語）
    共有リンクレポートに出力対象を選択する機能
    現在の共有リンクレポートのフィルタではファイルやフォルダ、Hubなど出力項目の対象を指定することができません。
    すべての共有リンク情報が出力されるため、項目が多く情報の抽出に時間を要します。
    Box Hubの共有リンクを棚卸する際に、業務負担を軽減するため、出力項目をHubのみとできるよう、
    共有リンクレポートのフィルタに出力項目の対象を選択できる機能の追加を希望します。

    In the current Shared Link Report filters, it is not possible to specify the targets of the output items, such as files, folders, or Hubs.
    Since all shared link information is output, there are many items, and extracting the necessary information takes a significant amount of time.

    To reduce operational workload when performing an inventory of Box Hub shared links, we would like the ability to limit the output items to Hubs only.
    Therefore, we request the addition of a feature in the Shared Link Report filters that allows users to select the target types of items to be… more

    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Admin Reports  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

17. Enable Cross‑Owner Folder Moves for Users with Sufficient Permissions (e.g., Editor)

    [Request]
    Even if a user is not an administrator or the folder owner, we would like them to be able to move folders across different owners when they have sufficient permissions (e.g., Editor) on the target folder.
    To allow administrators to control this behavior, please provide a setting like the following.
    Feature requested:
    Add a toggle (policy) in the Admin console or folder settings to allow / disallow “folder moves that involve a change of ownership.”

    We believe this will significantly improve end‑user convenience and operational efficiency, while allowing flexible control in accordance with each organization’s security policy.

    [Current status]
    Currently, folder moves that involve a change of ownership are allowed only for “administrators” or “folder owners.”
    However, in our company, folder ownership is distributed, and as a result there are many folders with different owners.
    End users often organize and move folders without being aware of the owner, which frequently results in errors such as “You cannot move this folder because it has a different owner.”

    [User impact]
    End users cannot flexibly organize the folder structure despite having permissions (e.g., Editor), which reduces operational efficiency.
    Every time an error occurs, they must request and coordinate with the owner or administrator, increasing operational overhead.
    It is difficult for users to understand “why the move cannot be completed,” which degrades the overall user experience.

    ＝＝

    タイトル：
    移動可能な権限（例：編集者）を持つユーザーに対して、所有者が異なるフォルダ間の移動を有効にする

    【要望】
    管理者またはフォルダ所有者ではないユーザーであっても、対象フォルダに「移動」が可能な権限（例：編集者権限）が付与されている場合には、所有者が異なるフォルダ間でも移動を実行できるようにしてほしい。
    その際、管理者側で制御可能とするために、以下のような設定項目を用意してください。
    追加して欲しい機能：
    管理コンソールまたはフォルダ設定にて、「所有者変更を伴うフォルダ移動」を許可／不許可にするトグル（ポリシー）を追加

    これにより、各組織のセキュリティポリシーに応じて柔軟に制御しつつ、エンドユーザーの利便性と運用効率を大きく向上できると考えています。

    【現状】
    現在、所有者変更を伴うフォルダ移動は「管理者」または「フォルダ所有者」にしか許可されていません。
    しかし弊社では、フォルダの所有者を分散して運用しているため、所有者が異なるフォルダが多数存在します。
    エンドユーザーは所有者を意識せずにフォルダを整理・移動することが多く、その結果、「所有者が異なるため移動できない」エラーが頻発しています。

    【ユーザー影響】
    ・エンドユーザーは、権限（編集者など）を持っているにもかかわらず、フォルダ構成を柔軟に整理できず、業務効率が下がっています。
    ・エラーのたびに所有者や管理者への依頼・調整が必要となり、運用負荷が増大しています。
    ・「なぜ移動できないのか」が分かりづらく、ユーザー体験が損なわれています。

    [Request]
    Even if a user is not an administrator or the folder owner, we would like them to be able to move folders across different owners when they have sufficient permissions (e.g., Editor) on the target folder.
    To allow administrators to control this behavior, please provide a setting like the following.
    Feature requested:
    Add a toggle (policy) in the Admin console or folder settings to allow / disallow “folder moves that involve a change of ownership.”

    We believe this will significantly improve end‑user convenience and operational efficiency, while allowing flexible control in accordance with each organization’s security policy.

    [Current… more

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Web App  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

18. Change the wording in the log in / Homepage

    Could the wording on the home page be changed to read "Employee of..." instead of "Part of ...."? We share Box with external users and the wording is confusing as they are part of the company but do not work for it.

    36 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    researching  ·  7 comments  ·  Web App  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

19. Masking Sensitive Fields in a Box Form

    Posting a customer feature request:

    Box to mask the field while the person is filling out the Box form. (i.e. Right after the SSN field is inputted, the Form field automatically gets masked).

    Also requesting to have the fields masked in viewing a form submission within Box.

    Ideally when building out the form, we can have a checklist next to the field indicating "mask for sensitivity" or something like that.

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    not planned  ·  1 comment  ·  Box Forms & Doc Gen  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

20. I would like the restrictions on Box AI to be lifted or reduced.

    It's great that the Box AI query limit has been lifted.
    Next, we would like to see the following three limits lifted or reduced.
    ・Limited to 1,000 characters per question
    ・Text content size limit is 1MB, with larger files only processing the first 1MB of text
    ・Non-English languages may produce lower quality results

    Of course, we would also like to see the accuracy of the AI ​​improved. (Especially Bax AI for Hubs)

    84 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    on roadmap  ·  0 comments  ·  Box AI  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating