Help shape the future of Box
Welcome to Box Pulse, our product feedback tool powered by UserVoice. Got an idea for how to improve Box? Share it with us and gather support or vote on other people's ideas. Your feedback is essential to informing roadmap decisions and shaping the future of our products. Thanks for joining our community!
See user guide here.
- or
616 results found
-
1 vote
-
Box Sign notifications: a setting to group notifications sent to signers in case of many docs sent for signing during the day
Sometimes our managers receive several docs for signing during the day and it's not convenient to be pinged by the requests during the day, also there is a chance to miss something if they don't sign immediately.
We'd like an option to group such notification in order that the employee receives one notification per day with all docs they need to sign.
It may be nice to have it as a company-wide setting for those who don't have an account in Box and a personal setting where a user can overwrite the company settings, if the user has a Box…1 vote -
Box Relay
Allow metadata and other substitutions in the message body and subject lines of the Assign a Task and Send a Notification outcomes. We would like to be able to customize message body and subject lines with one or more metadata items. As an example, if we have a workflow that is being run for each of several subject people (think onboarding a group of new employees), the tasks will be assigned to the same user for multiple people. We'd like to add name of target employee in the subject line or body of the outcomes.
8 votes -
Hubs Template
Make a Hub a template to then copy and paste the Hub in order to share with different groups of stakeholders.
37 votesHi! We release "Copy hub" feature in Hub's menu, near settings. This allows users to copy any hub they have access to and admins or hub co-owners to manage this functionality.
In the future we plan to add specific "Template" functionality but for now you can create templates yourself.
-
Custom collaboration expiration periods for individual folder collaborators
Currently, the only options for collaboration expiration on a folder is set at an enterprise level.
The request is multipart, for the options to
1) Set a custom collaboration expiration period at the folder level only (regardless of what the enterprise setting is)
2) Set different expiration periods (e.g. 30 days vs 60 days) for different collaborators or groups within the folder64 votes -
Augment existing collaborator permissions in inherited subfolders
Scenario:
Folder A is shared with User X with Viewer permission
Folder B is a subfolder of Folder A, on which User X requires Editor permissionAccording to support, the only way to accomplish this in the web UI is to first remove User X as a collaborator on Folder A, add them as an Editor on Folder B, and then re-add them as a Viewer on Folder A
This is clunky, annoying, and results in a lot of extra notifications.
Clearly this is supported by the underlying file system because you can do it directly with the Box CLI:
…
7 votes -
Deleted accounts: Retrieve and restore any previous collaboration relationships
Allow for a Point in Time recovery.
We inadvertently de-provisioned a group of users and then re-provisioned them. Upon re-provisioning, we want Box to be able to restore the user collaboration points to how they existed prior.
6 votesThis is not currently planned as it is an edge case. We will reconsider with additional demand.
-
1 vote
-
Ability for end users (non admins) to adjust metadata
As Box is evolving more into metadata driven workflows for digital asset library use cases, we need the ability for end users (non admins) to be able to adjust metadata templates specific to their use case or business unit. For example, we'd like to have a champion from Marketing be able to adjust JUST the metadata templates specific to their group, not any metadata templates related to Legal or Sales.
6 votes -
Ethical Walls - enhancement to Information Barriers for neutral site scenarios
Make information barriers work in neutral site scenarios. Where Group A and Group B can't collaborate each other, But if Group C invites Group A and Group B into their folder, the two groups can collaborate in the same space.
1 vote -
Function to disable the display of the login authentication screen for Box for Microsoft Office co-editing features on a per-user basis.
The following is a request regarding the seamless login feature.
https://support.box.com/hc/ja/articles/44224534926355To avoid displaying the login authentication screen, we understand that enabling the co-editing feature for only certain users in the tenant settings will resolve the issue.
However, if the number of users enabling or disabling the co-editing feature increases, managing user and group additions or removals through tenant settings each time becomes extremely cumbersome and impractical.
Implementing this feature enables end users to handle issues immediately on their own, reducing the burden on administrators.下記シームレスログイン機能に関する要望です。
https://support.box.com/hc/ja/articles/44224534926355ログイン認証画面を表示させないためには、テナント設定で一部のユーザーにのみ共同編集機能を有効にすれば回避できると認識しています。
但し、共同編集機能を有効/無効にするユーザーが増えたりした場合に都度テナント設定からの制限ではユーザーやグループの出し入れ等の操作が非常に手間となり現実的ではありません。
本機能を実装することでエンドユーザー自身で即時に対応できるようになり管理者の負担を減らすことができます。21 votes -
Groups visibility for end users
Allow users to see which groups they are a part of and who is in them. Potential workaround provided here: https://community.box.com/t5/Box-How-To-Forum/Box-Groups-Visibility-for-Users/m-p/26075/highlight/true#M2052
If some businesses want this restricted, this could be an Enterprise checkbox feature?
6 votes -
Ability to srt/arrange by in any aspect of Box ie files/folders or even users/groups etc.
It would be helpful to be able to sort/arrange by in every aspect of Box. One example would be managing collaborators in a folder.
For instance, if I want to add access by group, and remove all individual users, to do so I have to compare the collaborator list to the group listing and remove the individual user since they are added by group already. I cannot remove all individual users en masse because some of those individually added users must stay as they are not in one of the groups. But I do not have the ability…
1 vote -
Add User Groups as viewer to an Admin report
When generating a report (such as collaborations report), I'd like to be able to add a user group as viewer in addition to being able to add a user account. We have decentralized content management, and doing so would allow be to schedule a monthly collaborations report shared to a user group with the content admins. I can't do so for a user, as there is a risk the users changes role and would not anymore be authorized to access the report.
1 vote -
Password Protected Folders
Would love to be able to password protect certain folders within an unprotected folder. Since permissions "waterfall", I am unable to have a private folder within a public one. After reading the forums, this would be a very useful and widely used feature for businesses who want to limit access to folders to certain groups.
37 votes -
Request to Pool the Box Agent Daily Limit Across the Entire Enterprise
Box AI Home, Documents, Hubs, and Notes now have daily token limits, which I believe are applied on a per-user basis. We strongly request the development of a feature that would allow the limit to be pooled across the entire Enterprise and allocated by admins to specific users or groups.
e.g. Some users do not use AI that often, so we would like to allocate their unused quota to users who actively use AI.
【日本語】
Box AI Agentにはユーザーごとの日時利用トークン数制限がありますが、これをテナント全体でプール（共有化）し、必要なユーザーやグループに割り当てる機能を開発してほしい。AIをあまり利用しないメンバーの利用枠を積極的に利用するメンバーへ割り当てたい。81 votes -
Request for an Invitation Method to Enable Collaboration for All Tenant Users
We would like a way to invite all users in the tenant to collaborate.
Currently, there are over 30,000 users across the tenant, so it is not practical to register all users in a single group and invite them via that group.
テナントのユーザー全員をコラボレーション可能とする招待方法が欲しいです。
現在テナント全体で3万以上のユーザーがいて、1グループに全ユーザーを登録してグループで招待をする方法が現実的ではないためです。4 votes -
Additional Device Trust granularity
We would like to do an ownership check (domain or cert presence) for certain groups of users but not ALL users. We would like variability by user/group: e.g. users to touch tax documents must work on company-owned device, while most employees must have non-ownership checks (like disk encryption).
6 votesThis capability has been released. Feel free to reach out to us if you need further details on enablement.
-
Add ability to search for inactive users
This way, we can delete that group more easily.
4 votes -
More detailed error handling with sync errors
We have a user who is on Box Drive that has had several sync errors come up on his Box Drive client over the last week, but when he clicks on the info icon next to the s"9 items with sync errors message" it just gives them a generic error message with no details about which files can't be synced or how long they haven't been synced. I don't know if there's an existing solution for this, but thought I'd mention it here.
4 votes
- Don't see your idea?