9719 results found

1. Files that failed to upload are displayed at the top.

   On the file list screen that opens from the bottom when uploading, I want files that failed to be uploaded to be displayed at the top.
   When uploading tens or hundreds of files, it is not possible to immediately determine which files actually failed.
   You could find it by scrolling down, but the time and effort involved seems impractical.
   Like this feature to be implemented to improve convenience.

   アップロード時の下部から開くファイル一覧画面で、アップロードに失敗したファイルは一番上に表示してほしいです。
   数十～数百のファイルをアップロードする際に、実際にどのファイルが失敗したのか即時に判断ができないです。
   下にスクロールすることで探すことはできますが、時間と労力が掛かり非現実的だと感じます。
   利便性向上のために本機能の実装を希望します。

   3 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Uploads  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

2. More collaborative annotations

   When editing drafts of print and digital materials, using comments/annotations in Box has been my team's go-to. However, I think the level of collaboration for that option could use improvement. It would be nice to be able to respond to directly under someone's comment so everyone knows what is being referred to, and I don't have to type "in response to {name's} note on {thing}..." to get my point across. It would also be nice to resolve/remove comments in some cases.

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Annotations  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

3. File Request Upload report

   Within either the user activity report or a new report, be able to report explicitly on files uploaded via File Request links, the report should allow for a File Request ID to allow for a specific upload set, or File Requests created by specific Users (including an option for File Request links where the link states 'Prior User'
   The report should have the link, time/date, filename, path and size.

   Another option would be nice for a report that shows all inactive File Requests over the past, 30, 60, 90, 180, 360 days (or specific date from today)

   2 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Admin Reports  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

4. Ability to bypass email verifications for users

   We are currently having to add a secondary email to all of our users in Box. Once a secondary email is added, it will prompt our users to verify this secondary email. Can Box Admin have the ability to bypass this verification for the user and add the secondary email? This would speed up our process of updating accounts along with not having to constantly ask user to verify their email....or continue to send and resend and resend the verification emails.

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Admin Console  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

5. pop-up the warning information and provide the override windows when sending the invitation

   Box Shield/Access policy , when choose the option -- provide the justification to External Collaboration Restriction Settings

   Expected:
   pop-up the warning information and provide the override windows when sending the invitation

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Shield  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

6. Adjust Platform Activity Report to be Relative Timezone to User/Browser

   Currently, the date picker for admin reports is relative to a user's browser settings. However, the Platform Activity Report just uses Pacific time (PST). Often, this can be inconsequential/unnoticed, but under the right conditions, such as if a report is scheduled to run before 9 AM EST, the report needs to push into the prior day in PST, so the output displays essentially a 1 day offset. This is confusing to customers when encountered, and the logic for the report itself should mirror everything else in Box (relative to a user's timezone settings - whether on the account, or their browser).

   Currently, the date picker for admin reports is relative to a user's browser settings. However, the Platform Activity Report just uses Pacific time (PST). Often, this can be inconsequential/unnoticed, but under the right conditions, such as if a report is scheduled to run before 9 AM EST, the report needs to push into the prior day in PST, so the output displays essentially a 1 day offset. This is confusing to customers when encountered, and the logic for the report itself should mirror everything else in Box (relative to a user's timezone settings - whether on the account, or their… more

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Admin Reports  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

7. Have the ability to save a preset for organizing files (ie always default to alphabetical)

   It would be great to have the ability to save your desired file organizing layout so that you don't have to constantly click "sort by alphabetical" everytime you go back and forth on different pages.

   2 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Other  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

8. Box Shield - Ability to "assign" alert to users

   It would be beneficial to be able to assign a Shield Alert to a specific user / analyst / security team member, so they can review and analyze. This would simplify the process, and eliminate duplicate work as the security team do not work on the same alerts.

   2 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Shield  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

9. Visualize the description field on the metadata input screen

   Visualize the description field on the metadata input screen

   Currently, when you open metadata attached to a file, the description field is not displayed and you cannot view it unless you hover the cursor over the item.
   When entering metadata, you want to refer to the description, so it is inconvenient that the description disappears when the cursor is not over it.
   I would like them to change it so that the description field is always visible to the user, like before.

   メタデータの入力画面で説明欄を可視化する

   現在、ファイルに付与されたメタデータを開くと説明欄が表示されておらず項目にカーソルを合わせないと確認ができません。
   メタデータの入力時は説明の内容を参考にしながら行いたいためカーソルを当てていないと説明表示が消えてしまうのは不便です。
   以前のようにユーザー側で説明欄が常に可視化されるように変更してほしいです。

   8 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Metadata  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

10. How to Prevent Content with Classification Labels from Being Published on Hubs

    We want to set up a system so that if a user tries to publish a folder or file with a specific classification label to Hubs, a warning message will appear or an alert will be sent to administrators.
    Within our company, we assign classification labels to content that is kept private except for specific users, and we are also careful when granting access permissions. However, if such content is published on Hubs, any user who can view the Hub will be able to access the content, which defeats the purpose. We want to be able to strictly manage the access permissions of content published on Hubs.

    In Japanese：
    〈分類ラベルが付与されたコンテンツをHubsに掲載させない方法〉

    ユーザーが特定の分類ラベルが付いたフォルダやファイルをHubsに掲載しようとした場合に、警告メッセージが表示されたり、管理者にアラートが送信されたりするようなシステムを導入したいです。

    社内では、特定のユーザー以外には非公開としているコンテンツに分類ラベルを付け、アクセス権の付与にも注意しています。しかし、そのようなコンテンツがHubsに掲載されてしまうと、Hubを閲覧できるユーザーは誰でもそのコンテンツにアクセスできてしまい、本来の目的が果たせなくなってしまいます。私たちは、Hubsに掲載されるコンテンツのアクセス権を厳格に管理できるようにしたいと考えています。

    We want to set up a system so that if a user tries to publish a folder or file with a specific classification label to Hubs, a warning message will appear or an alert will be sent to administrators.
    Within our company, we assign classification labels to content that is kept private except for specific users, and we are also careful when granting access permissions. However, if such content is published on Hubs, any user who can view the Hub will be able to access the content, which defeats the purpose. We want to be able to strictly manage the… more

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Box Hubs  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

11. InTune MAM integration with Box issue

    When Mobile Application Management is enabled for Intune, if the default email address does not match the Intune email, then authentication fails, breaking authentication for all users.
    
    It seems a failover to the secondary email (which matches Intune) should be a given, and in my experience in product support should be quite easy to implement.
    Please add failover to the secondary email ID in authentication for MAM/Intune.

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Core & Technical Infrastructure  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

12. Let users use password managers

    Hey Box frontend developers,

    Your half-baked implementation of a password strength checker (e.g., zxcvbn or a custom regex), and then tying it to events like keyup, keydown, or input prevents users from using password managers. So now I'm using a really simple password that I can hand-type because you disallow pasting and (poorly) implement live re-validation.

    Congrats, your site is now less secure.

    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Security  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

13. Automatically add Office Online to a user's account when they attempting to open file there

    When users navigate to a file and attempt to open it via Office Online, if they don't already have the Office Online integration added, they are not prompted to manually add it (like a user is prompted to download Box Tools).

    Having a direct link to add box for office online so that users can themselves add this app like you see for Installing box tools will save users time, reduce internal IT tickets and requests for the admin to take care of, and allow for easier adoption of the integration by end users.

    4 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Partner Integrations  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

14. Support "Box Tools" on ARM, Snapdragon

    Support ARM, Snapdragon processors for "Box Tools" since many manufacturers are building devices using this CPU. The requirements listed in the Box Requirements article here; https://support.box.com/hc/en-us/articles/360043697634-Understanding-System-Requirements-to-Use-Box-Tools-v4
    Say nothing about the actual CPU only the OS, Browser. The Box downloads let you download the MSI installer but when you run it it gives an error..

    4 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Box Tools  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

15. Provide ability in Admin Console for Collaborating on Content > Incoming Invitations to be turned off for all users

    Provide capability in Admin Console for Collaborating on Content > Incoming Invitations to be turned off for all users rather than available by default in Account Settings at an individual user level

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Admin Console  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

16. Box Shield label error

    When applying Box Shield label currently the success rate is 90%
    I would like the success rate to be improved.

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Shield  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

17. New Content Manager Feature Parity

    The new content manager UI could be improved by having the following features that were possible with the old content manager:
    - Folder Properties: For a folder, the old UI shows the number of collaborators, and lets you dive in (properties, general info) to see the size of the folder (in terms of storage).
    - Copy: The old UI lets you copy the name of the item (super-helpful).
    - File Properties and Version History: The old UI lets you see the version history and access stats for a file.

    I like the fact that the new UI searches Box Trash, and I prefer the way it shows collaborators (if you want see/modify the actual list).

    This feedback is from Stanford Medicine

    The new content manager UI could be improved by having the following features that were possible with the old content manager:
    - Folder Properties: For a folder, the old UI shows the number of collaborators, and lets you dive in (properties, general info) to see the size of the folder (in terms of storage).
    - Copy: The old UI lets you copy the name of the item (super-helpful).
    - File Properties and Version History: The old UI lets you see the version history and access stats for a file.

    I like the fact that the new UI searches Box Trash,… more

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Admin Console  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

18. Unsharing subfolder

    We should be able to remove access to a subfolder without it affecting access to the parent folder. I understand cascading permissions from parent folder > subfolder, but it definitely should not be the other way around. Currently, we have a parent folder with tons of different subfolders underneath and when we create a new private subfolder, rather than having to un-share the parent folder with someone and re-share all folders except the private one, we should just be able to un-share the private subfolder without taking away access to the entire parent folder. This is a huge time-eating hurdle for us, so if it were fixed it would be a big improvement!

    We should be able to remove access to a subfolder without it affecting access to the parent folder. I understand cascading permissions from parent folder > subfolder, but it definitely should not be the other way around. Currently, we have a parent folder with tons of different subfolders underneath and when we create a new private subfolder, rather than having to un-share the parent folder with someone and re-share all folders except the private one, we should just be able to un-share the private subfolder without taking away access to the entire parent folder. This is a huge time-eating hurdle… more

    •  

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Users and Groups  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

19. Ability to save audio recorded from "Capture Media" to device

    Currently, videos and photos taken with the mobile app's "Capture Media" can also be saved to the device.
    However, there is no function to save the recorded audio on the device.

    IIf you record important data that cannot be retrieved for business purposes and the upload fails, there is no way to salvage the data.
    Due to the risk of data loss, we request that a feature be implemented as soon as possible that allows recorded audio data to be saved on the device.

    (日本語訳)
    <メディアのキャプチャから録音した音声データをデバイスに保存する機能>
    現在、モバイルアプリの「メディアのキャプチャ」で撮影された動画と写真はデバイスに保存することができます。
    しかし録音した音声についてはデバイスに保存する機能はありません。

    業務上再取得が出来ない重要なデータを録音し、アップロードに失敗した場合に、データを救済する手段がありません。
    データ消失の恐れがあるため、録音した音声データをデバイスに保存する機能の早急な実現を要望します。

    4 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Mobile  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

20. Box Shield: Request to Filter Download Events Not Performed by Users in the EMM App

    Our company is doing restriction monitoring for Box Shield.
    Specifically, we are able to monitor via the Event API when operations subject to restriction by Box Shield Restrictions: “Download and Print Restrictions” are performed.
    Enterprise Event: "SHILEDOWNLOADBLOCKED"

    However, in the Box for EMM app, we have the following situation because of the following specifications.
    *The user's actual operation is not performed, and the “SHILEDOWNLOADBLOCKED” is obtained.
    *There is no way to distinguish between operations actually performed by the user and operations not actually performed by the user.

    Therefore, please improve the functionality so that download events that are not caused by user operations can be filtered.

    Close the application with “History” opened and displayed when accessed from Box for EMM.
    　2. The next time you launch the EMM application, “History” will open again.
    　3. At this time, the content is retrieved.
    　　However, the user does not actually perform the operation.
    　4. Although the user has not opened and previewed the file in question, the Event API judges it as a preview, and it is detected as “SHIELDDOWNLOADBLOCKED”.
    　　This operation is not logged in the user activity report because the user did not explicitly Preview the file.

    Translated with DeepL.com (free version)

    ＜日本語＞
    弊社では、Box Shieldの制限監視を行っています。
    具体的には、Box Shieldによる制限：「ダウンロードと印刷の制限」で制限の対象となる操作が行われた場合に、
    Event APIで監視できるようにしています。
    Enterprise Event："SHILEDOWNLOADBLOCKED"

    しかし、Box for EMMアプリにおいて、以下のような仕様があるため、次の状況になっています。
    *実際にユーザーが行っていない操作が"SHILEDOWNLOADBLOCKED"で取得されてしまいます。
    *ユーザーが実際に行った操作と、ユーザーが実際に行っていない操作を区別する方法がありません。

    よって、ユーザー操作起因ではないダウンロードイベントをフィルタできるように機能改善してください。

    　＜現在の仕様＞
    　①Box for EMMからアクセスした際に「履歴」を開いて表示した状態でアプリを閉じます
    　②次にEMMアプリを起動した際に再度「履歴」が開きます
    　③このとき、コンテンツの取得が行われます
    　　※ただし、ユーザは実際に操作を実施していません
    　④該当ファイルを開いてPreviewしていないが、Event APIではPreviewとして判断されてしまい、
    　　「SHIELDDOWNLOADBLOCKED」で検知されます
    　　※この操作は、ユーザーが明示的にPreviewしていないため、ユーザーアクティビティレポートにはログが記録されません

    Our company is doing restriction monitoring for Box Shield.
    Specifically, we are able to monitor via the Event API when operations subject to restriction by Box Shield Restrictions: “Download and Print Restrictions” are performed.
    Enterprise Event: "SHILEDOWNLOADBLOCKED"

    However, in the Box for EMM app, we have the following situation because of the following specifications.
    *The user's actual operation is not performed, and the “SHILEDOWNLOADBLOCKED” is obtained.
    *There is no way to distinguish between operations actually performed by the user and operations not actually performed by the user.

    Therefore, please improve the functionality so that download events… more

    4 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Shield  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating