629 results found

1. Notifications as a Relay workflow outcome

   Add the ability to create a specific notification as an outcome/step in Relay.

   I.E. "If step 2 of workflow is not complete after 5 days notify xyz person"

   or

   "once workflow is completed notify this group".

   11 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   delivered  ·  0 comments  ·  Workflow  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →

2. Secure open link - Domain white list for open shared link

   This request is an idea that will become possible after the following requests are realized.
   Secure open link① - Require email address verification with one-time password
   https://pulse.box.com/forums/909778-help-shape-the-future-of-box/suggestions/43755942-secure-open-link-require-email-address-verifica

   【Summary】
   Please add "Allow only email addresses from specific domains to receive one-time passwords" to the Open Link settings.
   This will make it possible to prevent secondary distribution and miscommunication, which is a huge issue for Open Link.

   【Issues to be solved】
   Current Open Link is not secure enough as an alternative to attachments.
   Compared to attachments, the ability to determine the information of the access source and the ability to block access after transmission are powerful.
   However, it is impossible to prevent information leaks due to secondary distribution or misdirection, and a means to do so is needed.
   In such cases, we know that invitations are the best option, but in many cases, due to the requirements of the business partners, the users cannot ask them to obtain Box accounts.

   Current open-link passwords do not protect against misdirection and route eavesdropping, as they are mostly sent to the same destination via the same route as the link.
   Also, since the password is fixed, it is not a countermeasure against secondary distribution.

   【Idea Details】
   First, when issuing an open link, allow the user to select "Require email address verification via one-time password".
   (Request here:)
   Then, add "Allow only email addresses from specific domains to receive one-time passwords" to the settings section.

   If this setting is enabled, the following actions will be taken even if the accessing user is not logged in to Box.
   (1) The user will be asked to enter your email address.
   However, email addresses from domains other than the specified one cannot be entered.
   (2) If the user enter the address of the specified domain, he/she will receive a one-time password.
   (3) The user will be asked to enter his/her one-time password.
   (4) When the correct one-time password is entered, the open link will be opened.
   (5)The email address entered here will be displayed in the file access history.

   This request is an idea that will become possible after the following requests are realized.
   Secure open link① - Require email address verification with one-time password
   https://pulse.box.com/forums/909778-help-shape-the-future-of-box/suggestions/43755942-secure-open-link-require-email-address-verifica

   【Summary】
   Please add "Allow only email addresses from specific domains to receive one-time passwords" to the Open Link settings.
   This will make it possible to prevent secondary distribution and miscommunication, which is a huge issue for Open Link.

   【Issues to be solved】
   Current Open Link is not secure enough as an alternative to attachments.
   Compared to attachments, the ability to determine the information of the access source and the ability to block access… more

   15 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   1 comment  ·  Security  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

3. Box Sign - additional features request

   Additional features for box sign
   1. right click on a document in box drive and have the option to set up box sign
   2. multiple documents in a single box sign request
   3. ability to restrict options for signing so you can force a drawn signature as opposed to having the ability to use the stamp signature
   4. ability to edit document after clicking send request
   5. ability to edit a template to remove signatories if desired

   11 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   delivered  ·  2 comments  ·  Box Sign  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →

4. Idea: develop more ways to receive 2-step verification code (email address or application on smart phone )

   Recently, I did not receive 2-step verification code through SMS to log in my Box account, so I had to request support from Box team to disable 2-step verification in my Box account. I know that without 2-step verification, my Box account is less secure. Please consider the following idea: (i) add another way that we can receive 2-step verification code such as the email address, or (ii) develop the application on smart phone (e.g. iOS, Android phones) that generates 2-step verification code for Box account. Thank you (PS: I just move from BoxSync to BoxDrive, so I decide to post this idea in the area of BoxDrive).

   Recently, I did not receive 2-step verification code through SMS to log in my Box account, so I had to request support from Box team to disable 2-step verification in my Box account. I know that without 2-step verification, my Box account is less secure. Please consider the following idea: (i) add another way that we can receive 2-step verification code such as the email address, or (ii) develop the application on smart phone (e.g. iOS, Android phones) that generates 2-step verification code for Box account. Thank you (PS: I just move from BoxSync to BoxDrive, so I decide to… more

   4 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   3 comments  ·  Box Drive  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   delivered  ·  AdminJackie Yu (Admin, Box) responded

   We now provide TOTP support for MFA

   https://support.box.com/hc/en-us/articles/360059934154-TOTP-support-for-MFA

   For more details on setting up MFA for your account, please refer to this guide: https://support.box.com/hc/en-us/articles/360043697154-Two-Factor-Authentication-Set-Up-for-Your-Account

5. Request for Improvement of the “People with the Link” Feature in Box

   Request for Improvement of the “People with the Link” Feature in Box

   We would like to request the following improvements to the “People with the link” option within Box’s Share Link feature, which is used to grant viewing or downloading access to folders or files for organisations or email addresses that do not have a Box account or existing folder permissions.

   At present, requiring the link creator to manually set a password is rather cumbersome, and as a result, many users choose not to do so. Since there is no enforcement mechanism, some organisations restrict or even prohibit the use of this feature due to concerns over security management.

   Furthermore, when compared with other file transfer services, the People with the link option provides somewhat limited functionality for securely sharing files with users or organisations that do not have a Box subscription. Consequently, some organisations opt to use existing external file transfer services instead of relying on the People with the link feature.

   For these reasons, we would like to propose the implementation of the following enhancements.

   1. Enable password protection for the “People with the link” option. 　※No further action should be required from the user.
   2. The generated “People with the link” URL can then be sent to the recipient via email or other means.
   3. When the recipient accesses the link, they are prompted to enter their email address in order to receive the password.
   4. The recipient receives the password notification via email and enters it on the access page.
   5. After entering the password, the recipient is granted permission to view and download the file.

   By providing the above functionality, it would become possible—through administrative console activity logs—to identify, via email address, who accessed or downloaded files shared through the “People with the link” option and when.

   This would enable organisations to verify that files have not been downloaded by unintended recipients, thereby strengthening overall information security management.

   ＜日本語＞
   共有リンク機能にて「リンクを知っている全員」を設定し、パスワード設定を有効化した場合の機能改善を提案します。

   本来、「リンクを知っている全員」はBoxのアカウント持たない組織または人達にファイル送信する際に利用され、ファイル転送サービスの代替方法として活用を提案するものです。

   しかしながら、「リンクを知っている全員」のパスワード設定は、共有リンクを作成した本人がパスワードを任意で設定する必要がありとても操作が煩雑です。

   また、パスワードを設定したとしても別のメールで連絡をしなくてはなりません。
   更に、送信した相手が本当に参照したのか、ダウンロードをしたのか知る方法もないためセキュリティの観点から、ファイル転送サービスを利用した方が安全にファイル送信できると判断し、利用を禁止している組織も多いはずです。

   そのため以下のような機能を提供するのが良いと考えています。

   １．「リンクを知っている全員」を設定。パスワードの有効化を設定。
   　　※ユーザーの操作はここまで

   ２．上記で生成された共有リンクのURLをメール等で相手に送信

   ３．メール受信者は、共有リンクにアクセスするとパスワードを送信するためメールアドレスの入力が求められる。

   ４．メールアドレスを入力すると、入力したメールアドレスにパスワードが送信される。

   ５．受信したパスワードを入力するとファイルを参照またはダウンロードできるようになる。

   上記の機能を提供することで、「リンクで知っている全員」でファイルを送信したとしても、入力されたメールアドレスをログで確認できるようにすることで、いつ誰がファイルを参照しダウンロードしたのか管理コンソールのレポート機能で確認できるようにすることで、意図しない相手がダウンロードしていないかチェックすることも可能となり、組織全体のセキュリティ強化に繋がると考えます。

   Request for Improvement of the “People with the Link” Feature in Box

   We would like to request the following improvements to the “People with the link” option within Box’s Share Link feature, which is used to grant viewing or downloading access to folders or files for organisations or email addresses that do not have a Box account or existing folder permissions.

   At present, requiring the link creator to manually set a password is rather cumbersome, and as a result, many users choose not to do so. Since there is no enforcement mechanism, some organisations restrict or even prohibit the use… more

   14 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Security  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

6. Box Drive Accidental Deletion

   Since the introduction of Box Drive end users that haven't read the documentation and skip through the walkthrough aren't used to seeing all of the files and folders.

   The user without realizing, then believes that all of these files and folders either aren't needed or are taking up physical space on their hard drive.  The user then either randomly deletes select files and folder or just deletes everything within Box Drive.  A solution is needed to either further alert or prevent this.  One other possible solution is to create a process to fully restore all of the deletions and collaborations.

   When this happens, it literally deletes all of the files and folders from Box.  For the user that made the deletion, it will also remove them as a collaborator from those files and folders the user didn't own.

   This causes a number of issues and use cases:

   1. The user realizes the mistake, stops the deletion and restores all of the data from the Trash via the Box UI. -Since the user was removed as a Collaborator, it is physically impossible to restore the shared folders and files because those physically sit in the Owner's Trash.  The Owner or an Admin has to manually restore the data.  -Depending on the timing if the restore is done versus the deletion, the user may or may not still be a collaborator on the Parent/Child folders, thus causing Orphaned Folders and Files during the restore.  In this case, all of the Orphaned Files and Folders will be restored to the user that is restoring the data without any of the previous Collaborators

   2.  The user creates a ticket with the Admin and the Admin manually restores the data; however, this can still have all of the same issues as #1 unless the data is all restored without breaking the Parent/Child relationships

   Current Admin recommended steps for resolution:
   1.  Run the Collaboration Report EVERY day
   2.  As soon as the issue is reported, run the User Activity Report for the user for the last 30 days (this will help when checking the unique ID's of deleted versus restored in Step #10), specifically selecting the "Moved to trash" (under File Management) and "Removed collaborator" (under collaboration)
   3.  Filter through the report to see what folders the user has been removed from as well as how many items were deleted and from where (specifically looking for the parent folders to not cause orphaning when restoring)
   4.  Based on that list, take the Collaboration report from #1 and filter it based off of the user that made the deletions email in column I named Collaborator Login.  This provides the list of folders and folder Owners that once the data is restored could still possibly have data in their trash
   5.  Login to the user's account or have the user that deleted the data, change the Files and Folders Per Page to 100 in Account Settings
   6.  Go to the Trash and select the "Items I Deleted Drop" down and either select the items to restore or select "Restore All" (this could restore files that truly should be deleted)
   7.  If there were no errors restoring, then run the Activity report again with the same settings from step #2 and also include "Restored from trash" (Under File Management), if there were errors skip to Step #11 otherwise go to step #8
   8.  Filter the report for "Trash" and take all of the Unique ID's for the "Affected ID" Column G and de-dupe that in a new sheet
   9.  Filter the report for "Undelete" and take all of the Unique ID's for the "Affected ID" Column G and de-dupe that in another new sheet
   10.  Compare those ID's, if they data sets are the same then all data has been restored.  Please note that if a "Restore all" was done on the trash this could include data deleted before that date and may have restore id  since the reports include 30 days
   11.  If the data sets don't match, then take the Collaboration report from #4 and as an Admin, log into each individual account and restore the deleted file from the Trash just like in #6 or reach out to the user's and have them do this (if files were orphaned, please check the root level for the user that restored the data)
   12.  To be 100%, the same activity report from #7 will need to be ran for every user that data was restored from but in this case only for the respective day and then compare the same way as step #10 with the existing ID's gathered in step #10
   13.  Finally, if still this doesn't line up log back into the account that deleted the data and check the root level for the possibly Orphaned files/folders

   This is the only way to be certain 100% everything has been restored

   Since the introduction of Box Drive end users that haven't read the documentation and skip through the walkthrough aren't used to seeing all of the files and folders.

   The user without realizing, then believes that all of these files and folders either aren't needed or are taking up physical space on their hard drive.  The user then either randomly deletes select files and folder or just deletes everything within Box Drive.  A solution is needed to either further alert or prevent this.  One other possible solution is to create a process to fully restore all of the deletions and collaborations.

   … more

   16 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Box Drive  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

7. Search issue

   1) Searching in "File and Folder names" only will display results foun in file metadata:
   https://i.imgur.com/CUHkdDQ.png

   2) Search with Russian words will display irrelevant results:
   2.1) box finds particular letters, not complete words
   2.2) box displays search results even there is no file with requested name
   https://i.imgur.com/PEjs0ge.png

   8 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   1 comment  ·  Search  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

8. Separate Move / Copy buttons

   Please consider improving this within Amsterdam

   There are a number of use cases that can be supported by separating the Move / Copy button into unique buttons:

   1) Folder or file templates: Users with Viewer access (can download) should be able to COPY a file or folder elsewhere. Currently this is not supported -- the user must download, which loses BoxNotes and Bookmarks.

   2) Separating "records" from reference material -- If Retention is set on a file, the user may want to copy a version elsewhere that is not subject to Retention

   19 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   2 comments  ·  Web App  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating
   not planned  ·  Stephanie Zhang responded

   Interesting suggestion, but we won’t be focusing on this ask for the time being due to competing priorities.

9. Requests for additional features in Box Drive v2.33

   We have consolidated our content in Box, and have reduced the amount of space in the user area of our PCs to the point where almost no space exists.
   We also try to keep as little space on the desktop as possible, so the new features in Box Drive v2.33 are not required.

   ■Additional features that were an issue
   Saving unsynchronized files upon logout
   When logging out, users will be able to save files that have not been uploaded to Box.

   ■Functionality Improvement Requests
   Therefore, we would like to see any of the following realized for the ability to save unsaved files to the desktop upon logout.
   Proposal 1: Change the save location from the desktop to another location by changing the registry settings, etc.
   Proposal 2: Change the registry settings so that it is possible to return to the previous specification where files are not saved.
   Proposal 3: The default value of "Keep files that have not been uploaded to Box" can be unchecked by changing the registry settings, etc.

   【日本語】
   Boxにコンテンツを集約しており、PCのユーザー領域は容量を削減しており、殆ど容量が存在しません。
   また、出来る限りデスクトップに何も置かないように運用をしているため、今回追加されたBox Drive v2.33の新機能は求めていない結果となりました。

   ■課題となった追加機能
   ログアウト時に同期されていないファイルの保存
   ログアウトする際、ユーザーはBoxにアップロードしていないファイルを保存できるようになります。

   ■機能改善要望
   そのため、ログアウト時に保存していないファイルをデスクトップに保存する機能につき、下記の何れかを実現して欲しいです。
   案１：レジストリ設定の変更等で保存場所をデスクトップから別の場所に変更する
   案２：レジストリ設定の変更等で従来の保存されない仕様に戻すことが出来るようにする
   案３：レジストリ設定の変更等で「Boxにアップロードされていないファイルを保持する」のチェックをデフォルト値は外すことが出来るようにする

   We have consolidated our content in Box, and have reduced the amount of space in the user area of our PCs to the point where almost no space exists.
   We also try to keep as little space on the desktop as possible, so the new features in Box Drive v2.33 are not required.

   ■Additional features that were an issue
   Saving unsynchronized files upon logout
   When logging out, users will be able to save files that have not been uploaded to Box.

   ■Functionality Improvement Requests
   Therefore, we would like to see any of the following realized for the ability to save… more

   4 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Box Drive  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

10. Auto lock/unlock for read-only file.

    Currently, BoxDrive works with AutoLockUnlock=1 as below.

    1. When we open a read-only settings(Windows OS file property), it is locked automatically.
    2. And then, when we close the file, the read-only setting is gone.

    Please improve as below.

    1. When we open a read-only settings(Windows OS file property), it is not locked automatically.
    2. And then, when we close the file, the read-only setting keeps.

    Best,

    10 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Box Drive  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

11. I would like to have a collaboration role that only allows me to reference shared links.

    I would like to have a collaboration role that only allows me to reference shared links.
    Alternatives (1) through (3) could not be adopted for a reason.

    (1) Why not just use the Previewer?
    I want to collaborate from the top of the folder tree to prevent confusion about where I collaborated.
    For this purpose, I want a collaboration role that can only refer to shared links that cannot refer to other files.

    (2) Why don't we just create a shared link that is open to everyone and add a password?
    If you make it public, you won't know who has accessed it.
    Even with a password, there is a possibility of leaks.
    If you are a collaborator, you can restrict the disclosure to collaborators only, so it is secure.

    (3) Why don't you invite only the files you want to show?
    I want to collaborate from the top of the folder tree to prevent confusion about where I collaborated, so I can't do that.

    I would like to have a collaboration role that only allows me to reference shared links.
    Alternatives (1) through (3) could not be adopted for a reason.

    (1) Why not just use the Previewer?
    I want to collaborate from the top of the folder tree to prevent confusion about where I collaborated.
    For this purpose, I want a collaboration role that can only refer to shared links that cannot refer to other files.

    (2) Why don't we just create a shared link that is open to everyone and add a password?
    If you make it public, you won't know who… more

    12 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Users and Groups  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

12. The ability to take a picture directly from Box Notes

    As-is
    Box Capture needs few steps to upload a picture to Box Notes
    1. Take a picture and upload by Box Capture
    2. Activate shared link and paste it in Box Notes

    What it should be
    Box Notes has the ability to take picture and paste it to Box Notes directly
    1. Take Picture in Box Notes and sync the same permission as Box Notes

    10 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Box Notes  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

13. Notify me when a file is unlocked by another collaborator

    When a file is locked for editing by another user, on a case-by-case basis, I would like to be notified via email when that file is unlocked.

    Either:

    1. a file-setting that always notifies me after a user unlocks a specific file or
    2. a one-off subscription to a file when it is locked that I can set that notifies me via email when that file is unlocked. After this one-off notice occurs, the subscription would be deleted.
    10 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Web App  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

14. Request for improvement to the number of users without access displayed on the content card in Box for Teams

    If the user has only been invited as a group, they will be counted and shown as "without access" even though they have access permissions because they are not a direct collaborator.
    We are aware that this behavior is documented in a support article.
    However, the display differs from the actual situation and may induce incorrect responses, as described below.
    Therefore, we would like to request a fix so that it shows the accurate number of users without access, whether they are direct collaborators or group collaborators.

    　ex）
    　1.Even though the target user has access rights as a group, there is a risk that the user may be deemed to not have access rights and may be given access rights again as an individual user.
    　2.Even if access rights are truly required, there is a risk that the current incorrect display of the number of users without access rights will lead to missed access rights being granted.

    ＊Using Box for Teams：https://support.box.com/hc/en-us/articles/360044681474

    　「Difference between Channels and Chats」
    　・In addition, the permissions prompt displays if other users in the chat already have access to the file through a user group, but are not direct collaborators on the file.

    ＜Box for Teamsの、コンテンツカードに表示される、アクセス権のないユーザー数の改善依頼＞

    グループとしてのみ招待されている場合、アクセス権限があるにもかかわらず、直接的なコラボレータではないため、「アクセス権がない」ユーザーとしてカウントされ、表示されます。
    この動作について、サポート記事に記載されていることは承知しております。
    しかし、実際の状況とは異なる表示となっており、以下のように誤った対応を誘発する可能性があります。
    そのため、直接的なコラボレータ、グループのコラボレータにかかわらず、アクセス権のないユーザーの正確な数を表示するよう、修正を希望します。

    　例）
    　1.グループとしてアクセス権があるのに、アクセス権がないものと判断し、ユーザーとして個別に再度アクセス権を付与してしまう。
    　2.本当にアクセス権の付与が必要な状態にもかかわらず、現状の誤った、アクセス権のないユーザー数の表示の影響、と誤認し、アクセス権付与の対応が漏れが発生してしまう。

    ＊Box for Teamsの使用：https://support.box.com/hc/ja/articles/360044681474

    　「チャネルとチャットの相違点」
    　・さらに、チャットの他のメンバーがすでにユーザーグループ経由でファイルへのアクセス権限を持っているものの、ファイルの直接的なコラボレータではない場合に、権限のプロンプトが表示されます。

    If the user has only been invited as a group, they will be counted and shown as "without access" even though they have access permissions because they are not a direct collaborator.
    We are aware that this behavior is documented in a support article.
    However, the display differs from the actual situation and may induce incorrect responses, as described below.
    Therefore, we would like to request a fix so that it shows the accurate number of users without access, whether they are direct collaborators or group collaborators.

    　ex）
    　1.Even though the target user has access rights as a group, there… more

    12 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Partner Integrations  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

15. Enable SSO through OAuth2 and not only SAML 2.0

    We use an in-house IdP. This IdP leverages OAuth2 OpenID. It does not use SAML 2.0

    Therefore we need Box to have the capability to enable SSO through OAuth2 and not only SAML 2.0

    6 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    not planned  ·  0 comments  ·  Core & Technical Infrastructure  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

16. MFA option to be TOTP or SMS or Email

    When the MFA option is released currently the option is:
    1. TOTP
    2. TOTP or SMS or Email.

    Can you make it a check list so we can enable the one we want?
    For example, I only want TOTP and SMS.

    9 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    4 comments  ·  Security  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

17. Request for improvement of the UI for granting permissions displayed on the content card in Box for Teams

    If you try to grant permission before sending a message, you will see the error message "Return to the main window to perform this action"
    We are aware that this behavior is documented in a support article.
    However, the permission prompts on the content cards are confusing because they seem to require immediate action to grant permissions.
    We would like to see the UI improved so that it is clear that permissions can only be granted after the message has been sent.

    　suggestion1：Display a message that lets users know that they cannot grant permission until after they send a message.
    　suggestion2：Display permission grant message in permission prompt on content card after sending message

    ＊Using Box for Teams：https://support.box.com/hc/en-us/articles/360044681474

    　「To Post a shared link from Box in a Teams Channel or Chat:」
    　4.You need to send the message before you can grant permissions. If you try to grant permissions before sending the message, an error message Return to the main window to perform this action appears.

    ＜Box for Teamsの、コンテンツカードに表示される権限付与のUI改善依頼＞

    メッセージ送信前に、権限を付与しようとすると、「メインウィンドウに戻って、この操作を実行してください。」というエラーメッセージが表示されます。
    この動作について、サポート記事に記載されていることは承知しております。
    しかし、コンテンツカードの権限のプロンプトでは、その場で権限付与の対応を求めているような表示であり、混乱します。
    メッセージの送信後でないと、権限付与ができないことが分かるように、UIの修正を希望します。

    　案1：メッセージ送信後でないと、権限付与ができないことが分かるようなメッセージを表示にする
    　案2：メッセージ送信後に、コンテンツカードの権限のプロンプトで権限付与のメッセージを表示する

    ＊Box for Teamsの使用：https://support.box.com/hc/ja/articles/360044681474

    　「TeamsチャネルまたはチャットでBoxの共有リンクを投稿する」
    　4.権限を付与する前に、メッセージを送信する必要があります。 メッセージの送信前に権限を付与しようとすると、メインウィンドウに戻って、この操作を実行してください。 というエラーメッセージが表示されます。

    If you try to grant permission before sending a message, you will see the error message "Return to the main window to perform this action"
    We are aware that this behavior is documented in a support article.
    However, the permission prompts on the content cards are confusing because they seem to require immediate action to grant permissions.
    We would like to see the UI improved so that it is clear that permissions can only be granted after the message has been sent.

    　suggestion1：Display a message that lets users know that they cannot grant permission until after they send a message.… more

    12 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Partner Integrations  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

18. Automated way to manage 2 Step verification for external collaborators

    Provide API support to manage 2 Step verification settings for external collaborators .
    Our use case is to "enable only for select domains/users". It is difficult to impossible to manage this for 1000's of external collaborators via the admin console. looking for an API support here to automate the process of managing the external user's 2 Step verification settings. The API should offer
    1. Add external collaborator domain and specific email id to the 2 step verification
    2. Query status given a domain or user email address
    3. API to remove a given user / domain

    4 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Security  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

19. Add support for Integrated Windows Authentication for Box Drive login flow

    Integrated Windows Authentication (IWA) allows for the following login flow for the webapp:

    1. User logs into Windows
    2. User goes to Box and selects to use SSO to login
    3. When the user is redirected to their Identity Provider, the browser sends the user's OS credentials and the user does not need to enter credentials again
    4. User is logged into Box

    This would provide a more seamless experience for users. In our computer labs, users would sign into Windows, click one button in the Box Drive login window, and have access to their Box content natively in the OS.

    13 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    not planned  ·  0 comments  ·  Desktop  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

20. Download all versions of a single file at once

    If a file has multiple versions, it would be great to be able to download all these versions at once in a single Zip file.

    For exemple, if I have a Word file named "test.docx" with 247 versions of it, you would be able to download a single file named "test.zip" containing 247 Word files, named "test(1).docx", "test(2).docx", …, "test(247).docx".

    9 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Web App  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating