10050 results found

1. AI units insights

   Add enhanced reporting capabilities to the admin console that provide more granular and visual data on AI Units consumption patterns - instead of just a number on the insights. Having the just the tile with the overall number on the insights makes it difficult to track and manage my AI units efficiently.

   I would like to have:

   Graphical representation of AI Units consumed
   Daily breakdown of consumption data
   Ability to identify workflows causing usage spikes or dips
   On-demand access to usage insights

   5 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Admin Console  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

2. Prefer that it's not automatically set to "comment with time stamp" for video files

   When commenting on a video file, the timestamp automatically comes on. It gets in the way. Our team don't use this feature. Can it be set to off? And when we decide to use the time stamp feature, we can toggle it on.

   Sometimes we just need to comment back and forth without actually using the time stamp. Thanks!

   •  

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Other  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

3. Support Document Tabs in Google Docs.

   I am a heavy user of Document Tabs [1] to help with my productivity and organization when using Google Docs.

   However, if I create a Google Doc from Box or if I save my Google Doc from Google Drive into Box, the document tabs that I use are removed and the document tab feature is disabled. Because I don't have this feature, I am avoiding the creation of my Google Docs and storing my Google Docs in Box because it is causing a major disruption to my productivity.

   [1] https://support.google.com/docs/answer/15499791?hl=en&co=GENIE.Platform%3DDesktop

   7 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Partner Integrations  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

4. Box Relay

   Box Relay needs to be able to create a work flow for a parent folder and have it work for all child folders. A user is setting up a simple notification (upload, download) and then sends a notification to a set of users with a message. The user currently has to replicate or create a new Relay for each child folder. Very, very silly to have to waist so much time.

   7 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Workflow  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

5. Better Reporting Experience, Especially for Clients in Highly Regulated Environments

   In general, I think Box Reporting needs to be an area for improvement. There should be more options for reports and more filters and ways to manipulate the reports in Box.

   Something specific we would like to see is better reporting around Governance, especially with retention policies. We operate in a highly regulated environment where we needed detailed reporting around this information. There needs to be more granularity with reports, such as the Files and Folders report. We should be able to run a report that shows all root folders or be able to separate out folders and files. I've seen several ideas about being able to parse out subfolders as well.

   For us to prove we are in compliance for data retention and destruction, we need a report that shows all content has a retention policy assigned. There's really no easy way to currently do this. I need to run the Folders and Files report for All Folders, but then generates multiple csvs that are just about too big to open. There are also limitations we are seeing with this report, where we know content has a retention policy assigned, the policy has been assigned for months and the content hasn't moved, yet on the report, it's not showing as having any retention.

   Bottom line, Box Reporting needs to be better, more accurate, more real-time and just brought up to speed with the current times. And there needs to be more compliance related reports available as well. Thank you for your consideration.

   In general, I think Box Reporting needs to be an area for improvement. There should be more options for reports and more filters and ways to manipulate the reports in Box.

   Something specific we would like to see is better reporting around Governance, especially with retention policies. We operate in a highly regulated environment where we needed detailed reporting around this information. There needs to be more granularity with reports, such as the Files and Folders report. We should be able to run a report that shows all root folders or be able to separate out folders and files. I've… more

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Admin Reports  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

6. Box Events API Collaboration Events don't show the same details as the user activity report

   When a User Activity report is generated, we can show events for 'Change user or group role' and 'Removed collaborator'. As part of these records there are additional details provided showing:

   From: ROLE, To: ROLE, Folder ID: 1234
Was: ROLE, Folder ID: 1234

   When using Box Events via API we also see events for COLLABORATION_ROLE_CHANGE and COLLABORATION_REMOVE. These line up to the records in the User Details report however they are missing the details about the previous states of the collaboration.

   As part of our company policy for managing collaborations, I need to be able to fetch the previous roles of users so we can automatically revert these changes (in specific cases).

   I see that the information is being captured, but not passed through to the API for some reason. Generating reports manually each time is not a viable solution, so I'm looking to get these additional details added into the event's additional details dictionary.

   When a User Activity report is generated, we can show events for 'Change user or group role' and 'Removed collaborator'. As part of these records there are additional details provided showing:

   From: ROLE, To: ROLE, Folder ID: 1234
Was: ROLE, Folder ID: 1234

   When using Box Events via API we also see events for COLLABORATION_ROLE_CHANGE and COLLABORATION_REMOVE. These line up to the records in the User Details report however they are missing the details about the previous states of the collaboration.

   As part of our company policy for managing collaborations, I need to be able to fetch the previous… more

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Developer Platform  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

7. Set up abnormal download threat detection for a specific folder

   The threat detection feature for abnormal downloads applies to the entire Box and often results in unnecessary detections.
   If threat detection can be focused on specific folders, unintended detections can be minimized.
   I would like the threat detection feature for abnormal downloads to be usable by specifying folders.

   -in Japanese-
   異常なダウンロードに対する脅威検出機能は、Box全体が対象となっており不要な検出をしてしまうことが多いです。特定のフォルダに絞って脅威検出ができれば、意図しない検出を抑えることができます。異常なダウンロードに対する脅威検出機能をフォルダを指定して使えるようにしてほしい。

   2 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Shield  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

8. Streamline process for inviting free users to Hubs

   If a customer has restricted users' ability to create public shared links, they can only invite external users to Hubs if they already have a Box account. It would be ideal if this process worked the same way as it does if you invite an external user to a file/folder, where they are prompted to create a Box account (free or otherwise) and can then view the Hub. This adds friction into the process for users that are leveraging Box for external collaboration.

   3 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Box Hubs  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

9. Support for Hubs Management Endpoints via CLI

   Available via API endpoints, but support does not yet exist for management via the CLI.

   3 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Developer Platform  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

10. I would like the shared links to be automatically converted into hyperlink format instead of just displaying the URL.

    Similar to how it works in SharePoint, I would like the system to automatically convert shared links into a hyperlink format using the file or folder name, rather than displaying them as a raw URL.
    SharePointで出来るように、共有リンクを作成した際にURL形式ではなく、ファイル名やフォルダ名のハイパーリンク形式に自動変換できるようにしてほしいです。

    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Other  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

11. External Users sortable columns and bulk deletion based on last active date

    Box makes it easier thru the Admin console GUI in the near future.
    For External Users a sortable column of “Last Active” and then bulk deletion is needed in the Admin GUI.

    It would also be nice to have the option in Security to set a threshold like 90 days inactive for External Users before auto-delete to manage this automatically going forward.

    4 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Admin Console  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

12. CrowdStrike's ability to filter device protection by IP address

    Box Shield allows you to protect your devices with CrowdStrike.
    Once CrowdStrike is enabled, you will not be able to log in on devices that do not have Box Tools installed.
    Therefore, if you have a device that cannot be installed on Box Tools, such as Linux, you will not be able to use CrowdStrike's protection of your device.
    Only when calling from a specific IP address should CrowdStrike policies be applied.
    There is a need to not want the policy to be applied to unmanaged devices, so we would like a function that allows us to narrow down the target by IP address.

    【In Japanese】
    ＜タイトル＞
    CrowdStrikeによるデバイス保護対象をIPアドレスで絞り込める機能の要望
    ＜本文＞
    Box ShieldではCrowdStrikeによるデバイスの保護が可能です。
    CrowdStrikeを有効化するとBox Toolsをインストールしていない端末ではログインすることができません。
    そのためLinuxなどBox Toolsがインストールできない端末が存在する場合は、CrowdStrikeによるデバイスの保護を利用することができません。
    特定のIPアドレスで発信する場合のみ、CrowdStrikeのポリシーを適用できるようにして下さい。
    管理対象外の端末に対してはポリシーを適用させたくないニーズがありますので、IPアドレスで対象を絞り込める機能を要望いたします。

    Box Shield allows you to protect your devices with CrowdStrike.
    Once CrowdStrike is enabled, you will not be able to log in on devices that do not have Box Tools installed.
    Therefore, if you have a device that cannot be installed on Box Tools, such as Linux, you will not be able to use CrowdStrike's protection of your device.
    Only when calling from a specific IP address should CrowdStrike policies be applied.
    There is a need to not want the policy to be applied to unmanaged devices, so we would like a function that allows us to narrow down the… more

    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Shield  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

13. More granular visibility on Metadata Cascade Policies for folders

    Currently, when getting info for folders via API, users are able to see whether a cascading metadata policy is set, but can't see if it is set to override existing values, only apply to new instances, or not overwrite anything. Some customers would like more detail included with whether or not a cascade policy exists and what it's set to

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Metadata  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

14. Multilingual Support in the Prompt Library

    We would like to request that the “Prompt Library” feature support multiple languages, including Japanese, and align with the language selected in Account Settings > Language.
    We are confident that this would be a highly impactful update for many users!

    「プロンプトライブラリ」機能を日本語を含む多言語に対応させ、［アカウント設定 ＞ 言語］ で選択した言語と連動させていただきたいと考えております。
    このアップデートは、多くのユーザーにとって非常に有益で大きな効果があると確信しています。

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Box AI  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

15. We would like the ability to hide the “Download Report” button in Folder Insights.

    Folder Insight reports can be output by specifying a folder of which you are the owner.
    If you are using a closed folder tenant, the owners of managed folders are only users with administrator privileges, and end users do not own folders, so even co-owners cannot output folder insight reports.
    If you actually specify a folder with permissions below that of the co-owner and output it, you will get an “Insufficient permissions to create report folder” error.
    We would like to see this feature implemented to prevent such errors and confusion.

    フォルダインサイトのレポート出力先は自身が所有者となっているフォルダを指定することで出力可能となります。
    クローズドフォルダのテナントを利用している場合、管理しているフォルダの所有者は管理者権限を持つユーザーのみとなり、
    エンドユーザーにおいては所有するフォルダがないことから共同所有者でもフォルダインサイトのレポート出力はできません。
    実際に共同所有者以下の権限を持つフォルダを指定して出力すると「Insufficient permissions to create report folder」のエラーとなります。
    このようなエラーや混乱を防ぐためにも本機能を実装してほしい。

    Folder Insight reports can be output by specifying a folder of which you are the owner.
    If you are using a closed folder tenant, the owners of managed folders are only users with administrator privileges, and end users do not own folders, so even co-owners cannot output folder insight reports.
    If you actually specify a folder with permissions below that of the co-owner and output it, you will get an “Insufficient permissions to create report folder” error.
    We would like to see this feature implemented to prevent such errors and confusion.

    フォルダインサイトのレポート出力先は自身が所有者となっているフォルダを指定することで出力可能となります。
    クローズドフォルダのテナントを利用している場合、管理しているフォルダの所有者は管理者権限を持つユーザーのみとなり、
    エンドユーザーにおいては所有するフォルダがないことから共同所有者でもフォルダインサイトのレポート出力はできません。
    実際に共同所有者以下の権限を持つフォルダを指定して出力すると「Insufficient permissions to create report… more

    10 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Web App  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

16. View suppression list

    I should be able to view emails on my suppression list. I appreciate the ability to remove addresses from it myself, but not being able to see which email addresses you are blocking creates situations wherein I do not know someone isn't getting mail until after they have missed at least one message.

    30 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    researching  ·  4 comments  ·  Admin Console  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

17. Box Shield: Suspicious Location Alerts - Add details about content within 'User Activities'

    As part of triage for Box Shield Suspicious Location alerts, it would be beneficial to have details added about the content which shows up in 'User Activities'.

    For example:
    - The User ID/Email of the user who owns the folder/file interacted with
    - The File/Folder ID interacted with
    - Links to the Files, or their listings within Admin Console Content Manager, when hovering over their names.

    Also, being able to export this information would be beneficial.

    5 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Shield  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

18. Ready-Sign Links Start & End Dates/Times

    Would it be possible to add Start & End Dates/Times for Ready-Sign Links in the Link Settings? Our HR Dept. has a few templates that are only active during certain date/time ranges during the year, and they have requested the ability to set them up so that the link automatically actives and deactivates at certain times.

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Box Sign  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

19. Add a parameter for Box Sign API to keep existing fields when using Box sign template

    [Background]
    We'd like to use Box Sign API to create a signature request by Sign template.
    We want to use the existing template and replace the file to another file, but if we do so by Box API, the existing signature fields would disappear.
    *This happens because there are no parameter in Box Sign API corresponding to "Keep Existing Fields" at Box Web.

    [Request]
    Please add a parameter to keep existing fields for Box Sign API when using an existing Box sign template.
    *We think it's strange that what user can do in Box web is not possible with Box Sign API.

    [Background]
    We'd like to use Box Sign API to create a signature request by Sign template.
    We want to use the existing template and replace the file to another file, but if we do so by Box API, the existing signature fields would disappear.
    *This happens because there are no parameter in Box Sign API corresponding to "Keep Existing Fields" at Box Web.

    [Request]
    Please add a parameter to keep existing fields for Box Sign API when using an existing Box sign template.
    *We think it's strange that what user can do in Box web is not possible with Box… more

    9 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    gathering feedback  ·  0 comments  ·  Box Sign  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

20. Improve visibility and speed of LFOs within Box

    I’d like to share some feedback about the lack of visibility and the slow speed of Large File Operations (LFOs) in Box, particularly when moving large folders or performing ownership changes.

    These actions cause unavoidable downtime, but there’s no clear timeframe provided, and all items under the affected folders become inaccessible until the process finishes. This is creating significant headaches for our IT operations, especially as we’re working through major corporate restructuring. We’re forced to schedule these migrations on weekends to minimize disruption and open support tickets as a safety net in case the operations extend into the workweek and require follow-up.

    It feels like much of this pain could be avoided with improvements to how Box handles backend database updates and by providing better progress tracking and time estimates for LFOs. More transparency and predictability would make a huge difference for teams managing large-scale changes.

    Thanks for considering this feedback.

    I’d like to share some feedback about the lack of visibility and the slow speed of Large File Operations (LFOs) in Box, particularly when moving large folders or performing ownership changes.

    These actions cause unavoidable downtime, but there’s no clear timeframe provided, and all items under the affected folders become inaccessible until the process finishes. This is creating significant headaches for our IT operations, especially as we’re working through major corporate restructuring. We’re forced to schedule these migrations on weekends to minimize disruption and open support tickets as a safety net in case the operations extend into the workweek and… more

    6 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Web App  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating