10051 results found

1. Request for Hubs Version History Feature

   Customer Pain Point & Concern:
   Our customer is highly concerned about the risk of editors accidentally deleting or overwriting pages or sections within Hubs. Currently, there is no built-in version control or version history feature for Hubs (similar to what is available in Box Notes). As a workaround to prepare a backup plan, they are currently forced to take manual, regular backups by copying content, which has proven to be extremely tedious and inefficient.

   Requested Feature:

   Version History for Hubs: A feature similar to Box Notes that allows users to view, restore, and revert to older versions of Hubs pages and sections.
   This is a critical requirement for this large-scale customer to ensure secure content management and operational efficiency. We would highly appreciate it if this could be considered for the product roadmap.

   Thank you for your support!

   Customer Pain Point & Concern:
   Our customer is highly concerned about the risk of editors accidentally deleting or overwriting pages or sections within Hubs. Currently, there is no built-in version control or version history feature for Hubs (similar to what is available in Box Notes). As a workaround to prepare a backup plan, they are currently forced to take manual, regular backups by copying content, which has proven to be extremely tedious and inefficient.

   Requested Feature:

   Version History for Hubs: A feature similar to Box Notes that allows users to view, restore, and revert to older versions of Hubs pages… more

   4 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Box Hubs  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

2. Allow admins to set AI Home as a homepage for all users

   Allow administrators to configure AI Home as the default landing page for all users at enterprise level.

   By making AI Home available immediately after users sign in, organizations can improve usability, increase AI feature adoption, and reduce the need for users to navigate to AI Home manually.

   管理者が、ユーザーのサインイン後のデフォルトのランディングページとしてAI Homeをエンタープライズレベルで設定できるようにしてほしいです。

   これにより、ユーザーはサインイン後すぐにAI Homeを利用できるため、ユーザーエクスペリエンスが向上します。また、ユーザーがAI Homeへ移動する手間がなくなり、AI機能をより簡単に見つけて活用できるようになるため、AI機能の利用促進にもつながります。

   3 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Box AI  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

3. Show the date the classification label was applied for items uploaded by external users.

   件名：外部ユーザーがアップロードしたアイテムに対して、分類ラベルが適用された日付を表示する

   Regardless of whether the user checking the date the classification label was applied has the appropriate permissions, if the user who uploaded the item is an external user, the date the classification label was applied is not displayed.
   It is inconvenient that this cannot be confirmed from the Box UI.
   While it is possible to check the classification label application date in the User Activity Report, doing so requires an administrator or co-admin and can take time.
   Please make the date the classification label was applied visible on the item details page for the relevant item.

   訳：
   　分類ラベルが適用された日を確認するユーザが適切な権限を付与されているか否かにかかわらず、アイテムをアップロードしたユーザが外部ユーザの場合、分類ラベルが適用された日付が表示されません。
   　Boxの画面で確認することができないのは不便です。
   　ユーザーアクティビティレポートで分類ラベルの適用日を確認することは可能ですが、管理者もしくは共同管理者にて対応する必要があり確認に時間がかかります。
   　対象アイテムの詳細画面で分類ラベルが適用された日付を確認できるように表示してください。

   件名：外部ユーザーがアップロードしたアイテムに対して、分類ラベルが適用された日付を表示する

   Regardless of whether the user checking the date the classification label was applied has the appropriate permissions, if the user who uploaded the item is an external user, the date the classification label was applied is not displayed.
   It is inconvenient that this cannot be confirmed from the Box UI.
   While it is possible to check the classification label application date in the User Activity Report, doing so requires an administrator or co-admin and can take time.
   Please make the date the classification label was applied visible on the item details page for the relevant item.

   訳：
   　分類ラベルが適用された日を確認するユーザが適切な権限を付与されているか否かにかかわらず、アイテムをアップロードしたユーザが外部ユーザの場合、分類ラベルが適用された日付が表示されません。
   　… more

   4 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Shield  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

4. Security & Governance Risk Caused by Retained Collaborations After Folder Moves

   To help prevent unintended external access to internal-only content and strengthen data governance, we would like to request a feature that either controls collaboration inheritance when folders are moved or restricts folder moves within designated folder hierarchies.

   In the current Box environment, my understanding is that when a folder is moved, any collaborations directly assigned to that folder are retained.

   This behavior may lead to situations where folders with different access policies become mixed within the same hierarchy. For example, a folder collaborated with external users could be moved into a directory intended exclusively for internal use. As a result, external collaborators may continue to have access within an area that is expected to be restricted to internal users only. We believe this introduces a potential security and governance risk.

   To help mitigate this risk, we would like to request consideration of one of the following options:

   A configurable setting that automatically removes existing collaborations when a folder is moved.
   A configurable setting that prevents folders and their entire descendant folder tree from being moved under specified parent folders.
   More generally, administrative controls that allow organizations to enforce folder placement and collaboration governance policies when folder moves occur.

   We understand that similar requests have previously been discussed on Box Pulse and were not adopted, partly due to concerns regarding the complexity of collaboration changes and the volume of user notifications that could be generated when folders are moved.

   However, we have not found any recent discussions addressing this concern. Given the increasing importance of data governance and the prevention of unintended external access, we would appreciate it if Box could reconsider this capability.

   Additionally, we are not necessarily requesting these specific approaches. Any solution that achieves an equivalent level of risk mitigation would be equally appreciated.

   Thank you for your consideration.

   Japanese：
   社内専用領域への意図しない外部アクセスを防止するため、フォルダ移動時のコラボレーション継承制御、または指定フォルダ配下への移動抑止機能の提供をご検討いただけないでしょうか。

   現在のBoxの仕様では、フォルダを移動した際、そのフォルダに直接付与されているコラボレーション設定は維持されると認識しています。

   この挙動により、異なるアクセスルールを持つフォルダが同一のフォルダ階層内に混在する可能性があります。例えば、外部ユーザーがコラボレーションされているフォルダが、社内専用として運用されているディレクトリ配下へ移動された場合でも、その外部ユーザーのアクセス権は継続されます。その結果、本来は内部利用を想定している領域内に外部ユーザーがアクセス可能なフォルダが存在することになり、セキュリティおよびガバナンス上のリスクにつながると考えています。

   このリスクを軽減するため、以下のいずれかの機能の実装をご検討いただけないでしょうか。

   フォルダ移動時に既存のコラボレーションを自動的に削除する設定
   指定した親フォルダ配下への移動を、対象フォルダおよびその配下階層を含めて制限する設定
   より広義には、フォルダ移動時に組織のアクセス管理ポリシーやコラボレーション管理方針を強制できる管理者向けの制御機能

   過去にBox Pulseにおいて同様の要望が議論され、フォルダ移動に伴うコラボレーション変更処理や、それによって発生するユーザー通知の煩雑さなどを理由に採用されなかった経緯があることは認識しております。

   しかしながら、近年ではデータガバナンスの重要性や、意図しない外部アクセスを防止する必要性が一層高まっています。また、直近では同様の要望を見受けなかったため、改めて本機能についてご検討いただければ幸いです。

   また、上記の実装方式に限定するものではなく、同等のリスク低減効果を実現できる代替的な機能や制御手段についてもご検討いただけますと幸いです。

   ご検討のほどよろしくお願いいたします。

   To help prevent unintended external access to internal-only content and strengthen data governance, we would like to request a feature that either controls collaboration inheritance when folders are moved or restricts folder moves within designated folder hierarchies.

   In the current Box environment, my understanding is that when a folder is moved, any collaborations directly assigned to that folder are retained.

   This behavior may lead to situations where folders with different access policies become mixed within the same hierarchy. For example, a folder collaborated with external users could be moved into a directory intended exclusively for internal use. As a result,… more

   2 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Governance  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

5. I want to save Copilot for Microsoft 365-generated content directly to Box

   Currently, when I use Copilot’s generative AI features, the only default save destination is OneDrive—Box isn’t even an option. For those of us who live and breathe Box it would be fantastic if we could save Copilot-generated content directly to Box and keep everything in one place.

   Right now, every time Copilot asks, “Save to OneDrive?” I feel like saying, “Nice try, Copilot, but my heart belongs to Box!” Please help us Box fans avoid this daily heartbreak and make Box a first-class citizen for Copilot saves. Thank you!

   〈Copilot for Microsoft 365で生成したコンテンツを直接Boxに保存したい〉
   現在、Copilotで生成AI機能を利用し作成したコンテンツの保存先は、OneDriveがデフォルトとなっており、Boxを選択することができません。
   Boxでコンテンツを一元管理するため、Copilotで生成したコンテンツの保存先にBoxを追加してほしいです。

   23 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Other  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

6. If there is only one app which can open a file, let the “open” button call that app.

   Having to click the “open” button to hit the “open” button is infuriating. Perhaps, consider just opening the file when I click on it from the list and skipping this entire step all together? Skipping this page would be especially helpful when the preview does not reflect the current state of the document.

   •  

   3 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Desktop  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

7. Box Search Returns Partial-Match Results — Unable to Search for Exact Folder/File Name Only

   Summary: When a user searches for a term in Box that is also a substring of another folder or file name, Box returns both the exact match and the partial matches in the search results. There is currently no way to perform an exact-match-only search in Box, which makes it difficult for users to isolate specific content when similarly named items exist.

   Problem Description: Box search uses partial/substring matching by default. When a user types a search term, Box returns all items whose names contain that term — not just items whose names exactly equal the term. This behavior cannot be overridden by the end user through the UI or any available search syntax.

   Example Scenario: A user has a collaborated folder containing the following two subfolders:

   データ (Data)
   データ移行 (Data Migration)
   When the user searches for "データ", both folders appear in the search results. The user only wants to find the folder named exactly "データ", but there is no way to exclude "データ移行" from the results using Box's current search functionality.

   This is particularly problematic in migration or data management workflows, where users need to precisely identify and act on a specific folder without confusion from similarly named items.

   Summary: When a user searches for a term in Box that is also a substring of another folder or file name, Box returns both the exact match and the partial matches in the search results. There is currently no way to perform an exact-match-only search in Box, which makes it difficult for users to isolate specific content when similarly named items exist.

   Problem Description: Box search uses partial/substring matching by default. When a user types a search term, Box returns all items whose names contain that term — not just items whose names exactly equal the term. This behavior… more

   2 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Search  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

8. IP Address Restriction for Webapp and SELECTED API calls

   We want to enable IP address restrictions only for the web app and selected applications.
   Possible methods include submitting a list of client IDs exempt from restrictions during application, or providing a UI to specify an app list excluded from IP address restrictions.

   Currently, only the following two options are available.
   - Enable only for Webapp
   - Enable for Webapp and All API calls

   What we truly want is to apply IP address restrictions to the web app and BoxDrive. However, selecting “All APIs” renders nearly all other cloud-based integration apps unusable.
   For example, losing integrations that significantly boost productivity—like Salesforce, Zoom, or Box connectors for Zapier and n8n—is a major issue. While we could ask providers for their IP addresses and allowlist them all, maintaining a list of potentially changing IP addresses is impossible.
   Box itself recommends setting rules by domain in its firewall configuration support article, acknowledging IP addresses can change.

   The reason IP address restrictions via SSO cannot solve this is that they cannot prevent scenarios where employees authenticate internally, then take their device outside and access the company Box from an unspecified access point. Box's own IP address restrictions are powerful because they can prevent this, and it is essential to configure them to work alongside various integrations.

   We want to enable IP address restrictions only for the web app and selected applications.
   Possible methods include submitting a list of client IDs exempt from restrictions during application, or providing a UI to specify an app list excluded from IP address restrictions.

   Currently, only the following two options are available.
   - Enable only for Webapp
   - Enable for Webapp and All API calls

   What we truly want is to apply IP address restrictions to the web app and BoxDrive. However, selecting “All APIs” renders nearly all other cloud-based integration apps unusable.
   For example, losing integrations that significantly… more

   21 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   1 comment  ·  Security  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

9. Function to disable the display of the login authentication screen for Box for Microsoft Office co-editing features on a per-user basis.

   The following is a request regarding the seamless login feature.
   https://support.box.com/hc/ja/articles/44224534926355

   To avoid displaying the login authentication screen, we understand that enabling the co-editing feature for only certain users in the tenant settings will resolve the issue.
   However, if the number of users enabling or disabling the co-editing feature increases, managing user and group additions or removals through tenant settings each time becomes extremely cumbersome and impractical.
   Implementing this feature enables end users to handle issues immediately on their own, reducing the burden on administrators.

   下記シームレスログイン機能に関する要望です。
   https://support.box.com/hc/ja/articles/44224534926355

   ログイン認証画面を表示させないためには、テナント設定で一部のユーザーにのみ共同編集機能を有効にすれば回避できると認識しています。
   但し、共同編集機能を有効/無効にするユーザーが増えたりした場合に都度テナント設定からの制限ではユーザーやグループの出し入れ等の操作が非常に手間となり現実的ではありません。
   本機能を実装することでエンドユーザー自身で即時に対応できるようになり管理者の負担を減らすことができます。

   21 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Box for Office  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

10. Distinguish “Content Access” and “Download” events

    In the User Activity Report (and related activity logs), “Content Access” and “Download” events currently do not clearly distinguish between:
    1) Actions explicitly initiated by an end user, and
    2) Records generated by Box internal processing (e.g., system/background processing, thumbnail generation, programmatic/chunked access, or other non-user-facing operations).
    As a result, admins cannot reliably interpret audit logs for security monitoring, compliance, and incident investigation. False positives or ambiguous records make it difficult to determine what a user actually did.
    Request:
    Please enhance the User Activity Report / activity log records for “Content Access” and “Download” so that user-initiated actions and Box-internal processing can be distinguished. For example:
    - Subdivide event types (e.g., user download vs internal/system access), and/or
    - Add identifiable fields/attributes (e.g., initiator/source type: user action vs internal process; reason/context such as thumbnail generation, chunked content access, automation/app, etc.)
    Why this matters:
    - Accurate audit and compliance reporting
    - Reduced noise in security monitoring and investigations
    - Clearer understanding of true user behavior vs system-generated activity
    We would appreciate any approach that makes these records distinguishable and filterable in reporting/exports (and ideally also in the Events API, if applicable).

    In the User Activity Report (and related activity logs), “Content Access” and “Download” events currently do not clearly distinguish between:
    1) Actions explicitly initiated by an end user, and
    2) Records generated by Box internal processing (e.g., system/background processing, thumbnail generation, programmatic/chunked access, or other non-user-facing operations).
    As a result, admins cannot reliably interpret audit logs for security monitoring, compliance, and incident investigation. False positives or ambiguous records make it difficult to determine what a user actually did.
    Request:
    Please enhance the User Activity Report / activity log records for “Content Access” and “Download” so that user-initiated actions and Box… more

    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Admin Reports  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

11. We want users to easily obtain a list of file IDs

    We need a way for users to bulk obtain the ID information of files located in folders for which they have permissions.

    Currently, when users want to check a list of file IDs, they have to contact the Box administrator, who then exports a “Folders and Files Report” and shares it with them. Since there are many such requests, handling them is burdensome.

    Could you add the “Folders and Files Report” to the reports that can be obtained from the Folder Insights screen?

    --
    ユーザーが、アクセス権限を持つフォルダ内にあるファイルのID情報を一括で取得できる方法が必要です。

    現在、ユーザーがファイルIDの一覧を確認したい場合、Box管理者に連絡し、管理者が「フォルダとファイルレポート」をエクスポートして共有してもらう必要があります。このような依頼が多数あるため、その対応に手間がかかっています。

    フォルダとファイルレポートを、フォルダインサイト画面から取得できるレポートの種類として追加していただけませんか。

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Other  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

12. Enforce signer-only access and security controls in Box Sign

    It would be helpful to have the ability to restrict access to Box Sign documents to signers only.

    Currently, additional protections such as password or login can be configured, but access itself is not strictly limited to the intended signers, which may create a risk of unintended access.

    It would be great if admins could enforce signer-only access at the organizational level, ensuring that only designated signers can view the documents sent via Box Sign.

    5 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Box Sign  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

13. Add a normal Search Bar to Hubs

    The AI is not great. I have written instructions for staff to follow to troubleshoot something. The AI mixes steps and adds incorrect information so that it makes it useless.
    We need a normal Search Bar that can be typed into to find matching key words. It can just have up and down arrows just like "find in page" that allow you to skip through the hub to the related content.

    4 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Box Hubs  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

14. Exclude Specific Content from Box AI

    As a law firm we need to segregate certain client data from the ability to use Box AI due to legal agreements in place with their clients to not be able to use AI on their data. Currently we would need to turn off Box AI on the whole account in order to achieve this requirement, which is not ideal.

    134 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    researching  ·  8 comments  ·  Box AI  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

15. Add folder picker element to Box Forms

    We like the potential use of box forms + doc gen to create documents that share information, but a challenge for us is placing the generated documents in the right end folder. Currently, when filling out a Box Form, there is no way to target any folders in your box environment.

    If you want to use doc gen, you need to specify the final destination folder when you create the relay. Given our folder structure, this is not possible, and it limits cases where we could use this.

    Proposal: Introduce a permission-scoped UI Folder Picker element to Box Forms so that you have access to that folder in Box Automate.

    We like the potential use of box forms + doc gen to create documents that share information, but a challenge for us is placing the generated documents in the right end folder. Currently, when filling out a Box Form, there is no way to target any folders in your box environment.

    If you want to use doc gen, you need to specify the final destination folder when you create the relay. Given our folder structure, this is not possible, and it limits cases where we could use this.

    Proposal: Introduce a permission-scoped UI Folder Picker element to Box Forms so… more

    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Box Forms & Doc Gen  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

16. Feature Request: Add File Size Sorting Option to Box Search Results

    Currently, Box's search results page does not offer the ability to sort results by file size. Users have a need to sort search results by file size, particularly for identifying large files or managing storage. We request the addition of a "File Size (ascending/descending)" sorting option to the search results page.

    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Search  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

17. Feature Request: Display Per-Folder Result Count in Box Search

    Currently, Box's search results page does not provide a breakdown of how many files match a search query within each folder. This makes it difficult for users to identify which folders contain the most relevant results and to efficiently locate target files. We request the addition of a feature that categorizes search results by folder and displays the number of hits per folder.

    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Search  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

18. Streamline process of adding collaborators to content

    Our users often create their own personal folders and then attempt to share them with their colleagues via shared links. If their colleague has not been added to the file/folder as a collaborator, they will hit a page that says "This shared file or folder has been removed or is unavailable to you." They will then email/message the content owner to request access and/or ask if they have the wrong link. This creates a lot of ad-hoc messages and emails.

    It would be great if there was some kind of real-time notification process wherein the content owner was prompted to extend access to the user who was attempting to access the file (ideally, via pop-up). Or, a button for the user to proactively request access to the content, which would trigger an in-app notification for the content owner.

    Our users often create their own personal folders and then attempt to share them with their colleagues via shared links. If their colleague has not been added to the file/folder as a collaborator, they will hit a page that says "This shared file or folder has been removed or is unavailable to you." They will then email/message the content owner to request access and/or ask if they have the wrong link. This creates a lot of ad-hoc messages and emails.

    It would be great if there was some kind of real-time notification process wherein the content owner was prompted to… more

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Notifications  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

19. Schedule Retention Policy Disposition Report

    There are several common reporting capabilities which appear to be missing from Retention / Disposition reports:

    1. Ability to name & save a report configuration for future re-use

    2. Ability to schedule a report to be run regularly - Seems like a no-brainer for topics like disposition, which inherently continuously needs review as content falls out of retention

    3. Ability to collaborate individuals on a report so that business stakeholders can review regularly scheduled reports without needing an admin

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Admin Reports  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

20. Request for UI improvement of Box AI for Hubs

    Content: Currently, in Box AI for Hubs responses, sharing reference materials is displayed as a number, which requires a click each time and makes the display difficult to understand.
    　　　　We would like to request improvements to make it easier to access reference materials, such as by changing the subject line instead of the number.

    件名：Box AI for HubsのUI改善要望
    内容：現在Box AI for Hubsの回答で参考資料の共有は番号で表示される為、都度クリックが必要となり、表示がわかりにくいです。
    　　　番号ではなく件名等へ変更する等、参考資料をわかりやすくアクセスできるよう機能改善要望をします。

    28 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    researching  ·  0 comments  ·  Box AI  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating