Skip to content

Help shape the future of Box

Welcome to Box Pulse, our product feedback tool powered by UserVoice. Got an idea for how to improve Box? Share it with us and gather support or vote on other people's ideas. Your feedback is essential to informing roadmap decisions and shaping the future of our products. Thanks for joining our community!

See user guide here.

What problem could Box solve for you?

(thinking…)

Enter your idea and we'll search to see if someone has already suggested it.

If a similar idea already exists, you can support and comment on it.

If it doesn't exist, you can post your idea so others can support it.

Enter your idea and we'll search to see if someone has already suggested it.

  • or

787 results found

  1. Save the last view option in message tab

    The message tab is always defaulted to Unread "https://cloud.app.box.com/notifications/unread".

    For users who rely on other views (e.g.: Incomplete tasks) it would be easier if message tab would show what the user uses last instead.

    0 votes
    not planned  ·  0 comments  ·  Web App  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

  2. Flexibility to not notify signers

    Interested in having more flexibility of who gets notifications during a signature process. If there are multiple people involved but not everyone needs to a copy, they want to be able to elect for this option to reduce noise in inboxes

    1 vote
    0 comments  ·  Box Sign  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

  3. A method of Direct message or chat to a user.

    Besides notifications, we would like to have a way to DM or chat a user about changes to content.

    Comments are limited in characters and will also appear to others. This is why we would like a way to message a user directly within Box.

    1 vote
    0 comments  ·  Web App  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

  4. Box CLI resend

    The use case is we would like to resend/remind collaborators with invites of status "pending" using the Box CLI. Triggering new email notifications from Box.

    Presently we have to list the collaborators pending > csv, delete the collaboration, then collaborate again. A single call would make this much more efficient.

    0 votes
    0 comments  ·  Developer Platform  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

  5. BCC E-mail to Archive is Insufficient as an eDiscovery feature

    The BCC E-mail to Archive feature cannot be used for eDiscovery if users disable their e-mail notifications, as the feature only works if an email is sent to users.

    As a result, this control cannot be relied upon by organizations and introduces a gap in control.

    We require this functionality for our compliance/legal requirements.

    0 votes
    not planned  ·  0 comments  ·  Governance  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

  6. Detection and blocking of distribution lists

    We use many distribution lists to communicate.

    Technically, Box does not stop you from adding a distribution list email as a collaborator to a folder. All members of the list get email notifications but access to the folder is not granted to anyone on the list. This is expected.

    This suggestion is merely a protection measure that can be addressed by user education, so it may have a low impact.

    0 votes
    0 comments  ·  Web App  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    not planned  ·  vlarco responded

    This is an interesting request and likely something we should look into for future improvements to how we handle distribution lists.

    Because there’s a workaround and we have higher impact requests, we will table this suggestion for now.

  7. Web App: Grey-out "Allow users to join as" setting when blocked via admin console.

    We have many users who have opened up tickets or ask questions in regards to the folder setting “Allow anyone who can access this folder from a shared link to join as a collaborator. Allow users to join as.”

    This option is disabled, yet unlike the other options which are disabled, this is not greyed out. It throws a non-descript error of “Sorry, there was a problem saving the settings for this folder” which leads users to believe there is an issue with their access level, rather than this is not current functionality. Can we please have this option greyed…

    1 vote
    0 comments  ·  Admin Console  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
1 2 … 36 37 38 40 Next →
  • Don't see your idea?

Help shape the future of Box

Categories

Feedback and Knowledge Base

(thinking…)

By entering and viewing this page, you agree to be bound by (1) UserVoice Terms of Service and the (2) Box Community Terms of Use. In the event of a direct conflict between the foregoing terms of service with respect to the Box Community Guidelines, Feedback and Suggestions, the Box Community Terms of Use shall take precedence as between you and Box.