10050 results found

1. I would like to have sequential audio playback for audio files in the same folder (like a playlist)

   I would like a feature where audio files that are in the same folder to automatically reproduce one after the other without having to start each one everytime (like a playlist)

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Box Tools  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

2. Enable Deep Research Mode for Box AI Hubs

   <Current Observation>
   Box AI Hubs provides fast responses, which is great. However, for complex queries, users sometimes need more comprehensive and well-rounded answers.

   <Suggestion>
   It would be helpful to have an optional "Deep Research" mode, similar to ChatGPT's approach, where the system takes more time (even up to 30 minutes) to review all relevant files in the Hub and generate a deeper, more thorough response.
   This feature would make Box AI Hubs significantly more useful for detailed research and decision-making.

   <タイトル>
   Box AI HubsにDeep Researchモードを追加してほしい

   <現状の課題>
   Box AI Hubsは回答生成が速く便利ですが、複雑な質問に対しては、より総合的で深い回答が求められる場合があります。

   <改善要望>
   ChatGPTの「Deep Research」モードのように、時間がかかっても（例：30分程度）、Hub内の関連ファイルをより広く確認し、深い回答を生成するオプションがあると非常に助かります。
   この機能により、Box AI Hubsは詳細な調査や意思決定において、さらに有用になると思います。

   4 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Box AI  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

3. Large Folder Operations dashboard with status, ETA, rollback, and reporting

   Requesting a centralized Large Folder Operations Dashboard in the Box Admin Console or via API to improve visibility and control over major content transfers.

   During a large folder ownership change, an unexpected behavior occurred where ownership polling and job sequencing did not reflect the actual state of completion. This led to a move propagating recursively from an empty child folder to an inherited, multi-million-object parent folder.

   A built-in dashboard would provide transparency into large operations and prevent this class of issue from occurring silently.

   Proposed Capabilities

   -Status Tracking — show all active or queued large folder transfers (ownership, move, or copy) across the enterprise.

   -Estimated Time Remaining (ETA) — progress percentage and item counts to completion.

   -Rollback / Reverse Option — controlled, reversible transfer to restore ownership or hierarchy state if initiated in error.

   -Reporting & Audit — exportable logs of who initiated the transfer, when, and what content was affected (including item counts and folder IDs).

   -Workaround report - For parent folders with lots of subfolders and objects at the transferred level, a Google Sheet or CSV export with the Box file name, Box path (and recursive level), as well as the Box URL would be helpful to send to stakeholders to utilize to maintain business as usual by navigating to the Box link directly.

   -Workaround permissions - A temporary Box Group can add the users at the parent level and be added to the destination owner's folder during the transfer to maintain permissions as an option before the transfer.

   Value

   -Prevents cascading, unintended ownership changes on large hierarchies.

   -Gives admins real-time insight into progress and impact of long-running operations.

   -Enables proactive response in case of accidental or malicious large-scale content moves.

   -Reduces reliance on Support escalation for backend job status checks.

   Example Use Case

   A content move initiated on a single folder propagated recursively to millions of objects due to inherited permissions and ownership promotion. A dashboard with visibility and rollback would have allowed early detection and controlled recovery without requiring Support intervention.

   Requesting a centralized Large Folder Operations Dashboard in the Box Admin Console or via API to improve visibility and control over major content transfers.

   During a large folder ownership change, an unexpected behavior occurred where ownership polling and job sequencing did not reflect the actual state of completion. This led to a move propagating recursively from an empty child folder to an inherited, multi-million-object parent folder.

   A built-in dashboard would provide transparency into large operations and prevent this class of issue from occurring silently.

   Proposed Capabilities

   -Status Tracking — show all active or queued large folder transfers (ownership, move, or… more

   6 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Admin Console  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

4. Metadata Taxonomy Searches MCP Server

   We use taxonomy fields in some of our metadata templates. Using Claude.ai to access our data via the Box MCP Server we are unable to search taxonomy metadata fields. Enabling this would be very helpful for our use case. Thank you.

   2 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Partner Integrations  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating
   gathering feedback  ·  AdminKamil Kinastowski (Admin, Box) responded

   I'd love to hear more about this. Would you be willing to jump on a quick call to discuss this use case further? Here is a link to my calendar:

   https://calendar.app.google/NMXrGp4Nr1Do2qYz7

5. Embedded Widget wont load on my website if third-party cookies are blocked in the browser

   Recent changes by Box have made the embedded Widget I have been using for years useless. None of my clients allow third-party cookies by their browsers. They have been uploading files to me for years but now must "grant access" and approve cookies by Box, sometimes a four-step process to get access via the Widget on my website. Not workable. Will use a One-Drive link to solve, but disappointed. Your support team suggested I send my issue to you.

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Box Tools  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

6. The number of entries in the view and graph do not match.

   I would like the specifications to be changed so that the total number of entries in the view and the graph match.

   •  

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Box Apps  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating
   not planned  ·  AdminBlake Walsh (Admin, Box) responded

   Blank values are not counted in chart aggregates. This is by design.

7. Update Salesforce SDK Automatically using Box OpenAPI Spec

   The current SDK (https://github.com/box/box-salesforce-sdk) is very outdated and not well-maintained. With Box's ability auto-gen SDKs, we would like the SDK team to evaluate adding Salesforce Apex to the list.

   7 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Partner Integrations  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

8. Administrators to be able to monitor when a BOX sign is sent

   BOX signを例えば外部などに送信した際に、適正なルートを通った正しい署名依頼であるか確認や未然に防止する方法を実装してほしいです。

   Relayと組み合わせれば可能なことはわかっておりますが、全契約など署名が必要なものに対しRelayとの組み合わせを作成することは、現実的ではなく、下記ような管理者に通知する機能を要望します。
   BOX signを送信した際に管理者(例えば契約管理担当)に自動で通知できれば、
   社内決済が終わっているのか、契約内容は正しいのかなどを確認することが可能だと考えております。

   ご確認、ご検討をお願いします。

   EN translation:
   When a BOX sign is sent, for example to an external party, we would like a method implemented to verify that it is a legitimate signature request that has gone through the proper route, and to prevent such misuse.

   We understand that this is possible when combined with Relay, but creating a combination with Relay for all contracts and other documents requiring signatures is not practical. Therefore, we request a function to notify administrators as described below.

   If administrators (e.g., contract managers) are automatically notified when a BOX sign is sent, they will be able to verify whether internal approval has been completed and whether the contract details are correct.
   Please review and consider this request.

   BOX signを例えば外部などに送信した際に、適正なルートを通った正しい署名依頼であるか確認や未然に防止する方法を実装してほしいです。

   Relayと組み合わせれば可能なことはわかっておりますが、全契約など署名が必要なものに対しRelayとの組み合わせを作成することは、現実的ではなく、下記ような管理者に通知する機能を要望します。
   BOX signを送信した際に管理者(例えば契約管理担当)に自動で通知できれば、
   社内決済が終わっているのか、契約内容は正しいのかなどを確認することが可能だと考えております。

   ご確認、ご検討をお願いします。

   EN translation:
   When a BOX sign is sent, for example to an external party, we would like a method implemented to verify that it is a legitimate signature request that has gone through the proper route, and to prevent such misuse.

   We understand that this is possible when combined with Relay, but creating a combination with Relay for all contracts and other documents requiring signatures is not practical. Therefore, we request a function to notify administrators as described below.

   If administrators (e.g., contract managers) are automatically notified when a BOX sign is sent,… more

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   not planned  ·  0 comments  ·  Box Sign  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

9. Restrict CLI authentication to specific users

   In Box Clients, the only options for CLI authentication are to enable or disable it for all users. I would like to be able to enable it for specific users only.

   -in Japanese-
   Box Clientsで設定可能なCLI認証は全ユーザーに対して有効か無効しか選択ができません。特定のユーザーのみ有効化できるようにしてほしい

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Developer Platform  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

10. About the Box AI Agent in Copilot

    When using the Box Admin Console, it is possible to identify which files the Box AI Agent accessed and when.
    However, there is no way to determine how many prompts each user has submitted to the Box AI Agent via Copilot, nor the number of times they have done so.
    Similarly, there is no method to understand, at a system-wide level, how many prompts are being submitted to the Box AI Agent overall.
    Unlike general generative AI services, we understand that there is no cost incurred based on usage frequency (i.e., the number of prompts submitted).
    Nevertheless, from an administrator’s perspective, it is important to understand usage frequency. By providing a way to track this information, organizations would gain value by being able to report how extensively generative AI is being utilized.
    We strongly request that a mechanism be provided to monitor and understand the usage frequency of the Box AI Agent.

    <<<以下日本語訳>>>
    CopilotのBox AI Agentについて

    Box管理コンソールでBox AI Agentがどのファイルへいつアクセスしたかを把握する方法はある。
    が、どのユーザーがCopilotを介してBox AI Agentにどれだけプロンプトを投入したか、その回数を知る方法が無い。
    同様にシステム全体としてどれだけBox AI Agentへプロンプトが投入されているかを把握する方法もない。
    一般的な生成AIと異なり、使用回数(プロンプトを投入した回数)に対する費用は発生しないとの事。
    だが、管理者としてはその頻度を把握しておきたく、知る方法を設置してもらうことで、生成AIがどれだけ利用されているか報告することが組織としてメリットとなる。
    是非ともBox AI Agentの利用頻度を知る方法を設置してほしい。

    When using the Box Admin Console, it is possible to identify which files the Box AI Agent accessed and when.
    However, there is no way to determine how many prompts each user has submitted to the Box AI Agent via Copilot, nor the number of times they have done so.
    Similarly, there is no method to understand, at a system-wide level, how many prompts are being submitted to the Box AI Agent overall.
    Unlike general generative AI services, we understand that there is no cost incurred based on usage frequency (i.e., the number of prompts submitted).
    Nevertheless, from an administrator’s… more

    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Box AI  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

11. The upper limit on the number of file requests that can be "bulk deleted"

    Due to Box's specifications, you can delete file requests all at once using the following steps.
    However, if you try to delete nearly 1,000 file requests, you'll receive the error message "Failed to delete link." The following steps prevent you from deleting them.

    　[Admin Console > Content > File Requests > Select multiple file requests > Click the trash can icon that appears]

    For security reasons, we need to periodically delete large numbers of file requests to prevent unnecessary requests from being available for a long period of time.
    However, currently, the only way to delete nearly 1,000 file requests is to delete them in parts.
    This requires a lot of time and effort, so we'd like the limit on the number of file requests that can be deleted at once to be increased.

    【日本語訳】
    タイトル：ファイルリクエストを一括削除できる件数を増やしてほしい

    内容：
    Boxの仕様上、ファイルリクエストを一括削除する方法として、以下の操作手順でファイルリクエストを削除できますが
    1000件近いファイルリクエストを削除すると、エラー「リンクの削除に失敗しました。」が表示されて削除できません。
    【管理コンソール>コンテンツ>ファイルリクエスト>ファイルリクエストを複数選択>表示されるゴミ箱をクリック】

    セキュリティの観点から、不要となったファイルリクエストを長期間利用できないようにするため、定期的に大量のファイルリクエストを削除する必要があります。
    現状では1000件近いファイルリクエストを分割して削除する方法しかありません。
    管理する上で多くの工数がかかるため、ファイルリクエストを一括削除できる件数の上限を上げてほしいです。

    Due to Box's specifications, you can delete file requests all at once using the following steps.
    However, if you try to delete nearly 1,000 file requests, you'll receive the error message "Failed to delete link." The following steps prevent you from deleting them.

    　[Admin Console > Content > File Requests > Select multiple file requests > Click the trash can icon that appears]

    For security reasons, we need to periodically delete large numbers of file requests to prevent unnecessary requests from being available for a long period of time.
    However, currently, the only way to delete nearly 1,000 file requests… more

    8 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Admin Console  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

12. Cannot move files within Box when the file version is large

    We hope to resolve the issue where files cannot be moved once the file version reaches a certain number.
    ＝＝＝
    ファイルバージョンが一定数に達するとファイルの移動が行なえなくなる問題について解消を希望します。

    4 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Web App  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

13. Improved LFO operation stability

    There was a case where the upload process failed due to an error in LFO internal processing. We request the implementation of measures to improve the stability of LFO processing.
    ＝＝＝
    LFO内部処理のエラーによりアップロード処理が失敗したケースがありました。LFO処理の安定性向上施策の実施を希望します。

    4 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Web App  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

14. Pop up confirmation listing content prior to moving content to Archive

    Pop up confirmation listing content prior to moving content to Archive will help in confirming what should be going to Archive as a last check before the content gets moved

    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Box Archive  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

15. Box drive should only show and sync the selected folder and left the unselected online only

    Box drive now allows you to hide folder. Be frankly this is useless. Because for most the IT users, we normally enabe showing hidden folder/files option in Windows explorer. So for more prefessional usage, the Box Drive should only show and sync the selected folders. The folders not selected should be left alone online.
    One example, I have a box drive hosting many folders. Each folder hosting one project. The projects could be from different client. When I work with client A, I only want client A project folder to be sync and shown on my desktop. But now the other project folders are also included in the sync set. Even it is hidden but as said as long as you enable showing hiddeng folder/file option, you can still see, more importantly access those folders and files. This leads to potencial data leak.
    The Box Drive is a good product but clearly it is not ready to be an enterprise or professional solution like Microsoft One Drive.

    Box drive now allows you to hide folder. Be frankly this is useless. Because for most the IT users, we normally enabe showing hidden folder/files option in Windows explorer. So for more prefessional usage, the Box Drive should only show and sync the selected folders. The folders not selected should be left alone online.
    One example, I have a box drive hosting many folders. Each folder hosting one project. The projects could be from different client. When I work with client A, I only want client A project folder to be sync and shown on my desktop. But… more

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Box Drive  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

16. Security Control - Download and Print Restriction, possibility for Owners/Co-owners and Editors exceptions

    Security Control - Download and Print Restriction, possibility for Owners/Co-owners and Editors to be excluded from this restriction.

    Currently, for managed users it's possible to restrict all users except Owners/Co-owners and Editors.
    It would be beneficial to have a similar option for restricting external users

    •  

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Shield  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

17. Convert Box Drive File to Box Link when Emailing Copy of File

    We use Box to store company documents, and most people prefer to work with the Box files natively on Windows via Box Drive. The issue is when someone wants to circulate a copy of a file stored on box. The standard practice is to drag a copy of the document from Windows Explorer to an Outlook email. This results in a copy of the document, so future collaborators are not editing the Box document, but rather a copy.

    This is a common feature in most established DMS products, where the user is asked if they want to upload the actual file or instead, a link to the file so that when the recipient opens the attachment, they are directed to the file on the server, not the copy of the document in the email.

    We use Box to store company documents, and most people prefer to work with the Box files natively on Windows via Box Drive. The issue is when someone wants to circulate a copy of a file stored on box. The standard practice is to drag a copy of the document from Windows Explorer to an Outlook email. This results in a copy of the document, so future collaborators are not editing the Box document, but rather a copy.

    This is a common feature in most established DMS products, where the user is asked if they want to upload the actual… more

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Box Drive  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

18. Enhanced Granular Access Controls for External Collaborators

    Current Limitation:
    - Existing shared link and external collaborator settings apply a uniform 30-day restriction across all external users
    - No ability to create differentiated access rules for trusted partners or affiliated organizations

    Proposed Feature:
    Implement a multi-tier external collaboration access control system that allows:
    1. Configurable access duration and permissions based on organizational relationship
    2. Ability to create exception groups with extended or permanent access
    3. Granular control to distinguish between:
    - Completely external users (standard 30-day restriction)
    - Trusted partners/affiliated organizations (customizable access duration)
    - Specific trusted domains with distinct access rules

    Use Case Example:
    An organization wants to:
    - Maintain strict 30-day access for unknown external collaborators
    - Provide longer/permanent access for trusted partners like subsidiary companies or closely affiliated academic/research institutions

    Business Value:
    - Increases flexibility in collaboration management
    - Reduces administrative overhead of manually managing access
    - Provides more nuanced security controls

    Current Limitation:
    - Existing shared link and external collaborator settings apply a uniform 30-day restriction across all external users
    - No ability to create differentiated access rules for trusted partners or affiliated organizations

    Proposed Feature:
    Implement a multi-tier external collaboration access control system that allows:
    1. Configurable access duration and permissions based on organizational relationship
    2. Ability to create exception groups with extended or permanent access
    3. Granular control to distinguish between:
    - Completely external users (standard 30-day restriction)
    - Trusted partners/affiliated organizations (customizable access duration)
    - Specific trusted domains with distinct access rules

    Use Case Example:
    An organization wants… more

    4 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Web App  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

19. Request new report by file extension

    While you can check rough file types from the storage in admin insights, there are many situations in operations where you need to understand capacity and file counts at the extension level. I would like to request a report that can show file sizes by extension. I also want it to support filtering by owner.

    管理者インサイトのストレージから大まかなファイルタイプを確認できますが、運用では拡張子の粒度で容量や件数を把握したい場面が多くあります。拡張子ごとのファイルサイズを確認できるレポートの提供を希望します。所有者ごとのフィルタリングにも対応してほしいです。

    6 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Admin Reports  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

20. Add per-role cap for external collaborator invitations at the enterprise and group level

    Proposed solution
    Add a Maximum External Collaboration Role setting in Admin Console > Enterprise Settings > Content & Sharing that:

    -Caps the highest role a managed user can grant to external collaborators(or internal as well).
    -Removes higher roles from the invite dropdown so the limit is visible at the point of action.
    -Applies globally with optional overrides per group, per user, and per folder (respecting "most restrictive wins").

    Why it matters
    This separates "can invite" from "what they can grant", a standard pattern in enterprise content platforms and a common ask from security and compliance teams. Letting admins enable broad self-service external collaboration without the risk of over-permissioning.

    This would significantly reduce our administrative overhead by letting us define sharing policies up front, so end users can collaborate externally on their own without waiting on helpdesk tickets to provision access.

    Proposed solution
    Add a Maximum External Collaboration Role setting in Admin Console > Enterprise Settings > Content & Sharing that:

    -Caps the highest role a managed user can grant to external collaborators(or internal as well).
    -Removes higher roles from the invite dropdown so the limit is visible at the point of action.
    -Applies globally with optional overrides per group, per user, and per folder (respecting "most restrictive wins").

    Why it matters
    This separates "can invite" from "what they can grant", a standard pattern in enterprise content platforms and a common ask from security and compliance teams. Letting admins enable broad… more

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Users and Groups  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating