9944 results found

1. Real-time visibility of whether a user has external collaborations ユーザーが外部コラボレーションを行っているかをリアルタイムで確認する機能

   ・Problem Statement / 課題
   In the legacy Content Manager, an admin could see — in real time — that a managed user had a folder collaborated with an external party, along with the owner name. This was used as a pre-check before deleting/offboarding the user. The new Content Manager no longer surfaces external folders, so this real-time check is no longer possible through the UI.
   レガシーContent Managerでは、管理者は対象ユーザーが外部とコラボレーションしているフォルダの存在と所有者名を、リアルタイムで確認できました。これはユーザーの削除/オフボーディング前の事前チェックとして使われていました。新Content Managerでは外部フォルダが表示されなくなったため、このリアルタイム確認がUI上で行えなくなっています。
   Note: This request is not specifically about Content Manager. The legacy CM simply happened to be where this was possible. We are requesting the capability (real-time admin-side visibility of a user's external collaboration status), regardless of where in the product it is surfaced (Admin Console, a dedicated view, etc.).
   補足：本要望はContent Managerに限定したものではありません。 レガシーCMがたまたまそれを実現できる場所だっただけです。要望しているのは「管理者側でユーザーの外部コラボレーション状況をリアルタイムに把握できる機能そのもの」であり、提供場所（Admin Console、専用ビュー等）は問いません。

   ・Requirements (phased) / 要件（段階別）
   The top priority is real-time confirmation of a user's external-collaboration status. Reporting (with up to 24h delay) does not satisfy this.
   最優先事項は、ユーザーの外部コラボレーション状況をリアルタイムで確認できることです。レポート（最大24時間の遅延あり）ではこれを満たしません。

   Phase 1 (minimum acceptable): For a given managed user, show in real time whether they have any external-folder collaboration (yes/no, existence only).
   Phase 2 (desired enhancement): Additionally show which external tenant(s) the user is collaborating with.
   第一段階（最低限）： 対象ユーザーについて、外部フォルダコラボレーションの有無をリアルタイムに表示する（yes/no、存在のみ）。
   第二段階（追加で望ましい）： 加えて、そのユーザーがどの外部テナントとコラボレーションしているかを表示する。

   ・Current Workaround and Its Limitations / 現行のワークアラウンドとその限界
   Affected customers are currently using the API (List items in folder against folderid: 0 / root) as a temporary workaround, expected to last only a few months. This is not a sustainable solution.
   該当顧客は現在、API（List items in folder を folderid: 0／ルートに対して実行）を一時的なワークアラウンドとして使用していますが、これは数か月程度の暫定策と想定されています。持続可能な解決策ではありません。
   Other admin-side options are insufficient for this use case:

   Reports: Content reports reflect data only up to ~24 hours before report run time (per Box Support, "Running Reports"). Content added in the last 24h can be missing → fails the real-time requirement.
   Instant Login (Admin Console): Does not work for external folders, so it cannot be used to verify external collaboration.

   その他の管理者側の選択肢は、本ユースケースには不十分です：

   レポート： コンテンツレポートはレポート実行時点の約24時間前までのデータしか反映しません（Box Support「Running Reports」より）。直近24時間に追加されたコンテンツが欠落しうるため、リアルタイム要件を満たしません。
   Instant Login（Admin Console）： 外部フォルダには機能しないため、外部コラボレーションの確認には使えません。

   ・Business Impact / ビジネスインパクト
   In Japan, external-collaboration visibility directly affects user-offboarding and license-seat management for customers with record-retention obligations. Without a real-time check, IT cannot confidently delete users (compliance risk per customer), which ties up limited license seats and creates operational friction. This pattern is likely to recur across regulated/large enterprises in the Japanese market, so the capability has value beyond a single account.
   日本では、外部コラボレーションの可視性が、記録保存義務を持つ顧客のユーザーオフボーディングおよびライセンスシート管理に直接影響します。リアルタイムの確認手段がないと、IT部門は確信を持ってユーザーを削除できず（顧客視点ではコンプライアンスリスク）、限られたライセンスシートが拘束され、運用上のフリクションが生じます。このパターンは日本市場の規制業界/大企業で繰り返し発生する可能性が高く、単一アカウントを超えた価値を持つ機能です。

   ・Problem Statement / 課題
   In the legacy Content Manager, an admin could see — in real time — that a managed user had a folder collaborated with an external party, along with the owner name. This was used as a pre-check before deleting/offboarding the user. The new Content Manager no longer surfaces external folders, so this real-time check is no longer possible through the UI.
   レガシーContent Managerでは、管理者は対象ユーザーが外部とコラボレーションしているフォルダの存在と所有者名を、リアルタイムで確認できました。これはユーザーの削除/オフボーディング前の事前チェックとして使われていました。新Content Managerでは外部フォルダが表示されなくなったため、このリアルタイム確認がUI上で行えなくなっています。
   Note: This request is not specifically about Content Manager. The legacy CM simply happened to be where this was possible. We are requesting the capability (real-time admin-side visibility of a user… more

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Admin Console  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

2. Increased Character Limit - Box Forms

   Please increase character limit to 1000 for Box Forms long text. We have questions in surveys that we are looking to send out via Box Forms that exceed the current, 100-character limit.

   •  

   13 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   researching  ·  1 comment  ·  Box Forms & Doc Gen  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

3. Using public Beta for Folder Insights with Editor permissions

   Most users who need Folder Insights are editors.
   Also, invitations are often restricted for security reasons.
   I would like to see Folder Insights and reports downloadable even for invite-restricted editors.

   -in Japanese-
   フォルダインサイトを必要としているユーザーの多くは編集者権限であり、
   またセキュリティ上の理由から招待を制限されていることが多い。
   招待制限されている編集者権限でもフォルダインサイトの閲覧とレポートのダウンロードができるようにしてほしい。

   34 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   gathering feedback  ·  1 comment  ·  Admin Console  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

4. Request for improvement of the event where the cell date is different when previewing an Excel file

   In Excel, if you enter a date in a cell with a custom format, a different date will be displayed when viewed with previewer permissions.
   For example, if you enter "2026/1/1", if you check it with the previewer permission, it will be displayed as "2026/10/12".
   This event is described below.

   Introducing Box Preview – Box Support
   https://support.box.com/hc/en-us/articles/360044195013-Introducing-Box-Preview

   “Date values with the custom format "yyyy/m/d (aaa)" may show incorrect dates. This is due to a bug in the library that Box Content Preview has a dependency on. The workaround is to use a different format such as "yyyy/m/d (ddd)" or "yyyy/m/d".”

   Editor and viewer permissions are displayed as they were entered, but previewer permissions are not the date entered.
   It seems to be caused by a bug in the library that Box Content Preview depends on, but there is no way to check the correct date because the previewer permission does not allow downloading the file.
   Therefore, we strongly request improvements.

   【In Japanese】
   ＜タイトル＞
   Excelファイルをプレビューした際にセルの日付が異なる事象の改善要望
   ＜本文＞
   Excelにおいて、表示形式がユーザー定義となっているセルに日付を入力すると、プレビューアー権限で表示した際に異なった日付が表示されます。
   例えば、『2026/1/1』と入力したセルはプレビューアー権限で確認すると『2026/10/12』と表示されます。
   この事象は下記に記載があります。

   Boxプレビューの概要 – Box Support
   https://support.box.com/hc/ja/articles/360044195013-Box%E3%83%97%E3%83%AC%E3%83%93%E3%83%A5%E3%83%BC%E3%81%AE%E6%A6%82%E8%A6%81

   カスタム形式「yyyy/m/d (aaa)」を使用した日付の値は、誤った日付を示す場合があります。 これは、Box Content Previewが依存しているライブラリのバグが原因です。 回避策として、「yyyy/m/d (ddd)」、「yyyy/m/d」のような別の形式を使用します。

   編集者権限やビューアー権限は入力時と同じものが表示されますが、プレビューアー権限では入力されている日付ではありません。
   Box Content Previewが依存しているライブラリのバグが原因のようですが、プレビューアー権限はファイルのダウンロードができないため正しい日付を確認する方法がありません。
   そのため、改善を強く要望いたします。

   In Excel, if you enter a date in a cell with a custom format, a different date will be displayed when viewed with previewer permissions.
   For example, if you enter "2026/1/1", if you check it with the previewer permission, it will be displayed as "2026/10/12".
   This event is described below.

   Introducing Box Preview – Box Support
   https://support.box.com/hc/en-us/articles/360044195013-Introducing-Box-Preview

   “Date values with the custom format "yyyy/m/d (aaa)" may show incorrect dates. This is due to a bug in the library that Box Content Preview has a dependency on. The workaround is to use a different format such as "yyyy/m/d (ddd)" or "yyyy/m/d".”

   … more

   5 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Preview  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

5. Automatic Approval Removal When Deleting Apps

   Since the maximum number of app approvals is limited to 100, periodic deletion of apps is required. However, at present we must request Box to perform these deletions.

   We’d like both JWT and OAuth authentication to automatically revoke authorization when an app is deleted in the developer console.

   If the service account owns any content, we would like a dialog similar to the one shown when deleting a user, allowing us to choose whether to move or delete the content.

   アプリ承認の上限数が100であるため、定期的な削除が必要ですが、現状はBoxに依頼をする必要があります。
   JWT 認証と OAuth認証の両方で、開発者コンソールでアプリを削除したときに自動的に承認を削除するようにして欲しいです。
   もしサービスアカウントがコンテンツを持っている場合は、ユーザーの削除と同様のダイアログを表示してコンテンツを移動、削除どちらかを選択させたいです。

   4 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Web App  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

6. Increase the Maximum Number of Actions per Box Automate Workflow

   {English}
   We would like to request an increase in the maximum number of actions that can be executed within a single Box Automate workflow.

   Currently, the limit is 200 actions per workflow execution. However, based on real customer business requirements, some workflows are reaching this limit and cannot be fully implemented within the current constraints.

   Increasing the limit to approximately 2,000 actions would address these use cases and enable customers to automate larger-scale business processes without requiring complex workarounds or workflow redesign.

   This request was submitted based on customer feedback.

   ====
   {Japanese}
   Box Automateワークフローで一度に実行できるアクション数の上限拡張を希望します。

   現在、1回のワークフロー実行で利用できるアクション数は200に制限されています。しかし、実際の顧客業務要件を考慮すると、この上限に達してしまい、実現できないフローが存在します。

   上限を2,000アクション程度まで拡張いただけると、このようなユースケースに対応でき、大規模な業務プロセスをワークアラウンドや複雑なフロー分割なしで実装できるようになります。

   本要望は顧客からのフィードバックに基づくものです。

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Box Automate  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

7. Improvement of API performance and creation of guidelines for API usage

   When utilizing Box’s API, if the amount of content per folder is enormous or the number of invitations to a folder is high, the processing speed drops significantly. As a result, it takes a long time to complete operations, which is quite frustrating.

   We would like the API to deliver a more comfortable and speedy processing experience, so I hope you will improve the performance when using the API.

   Additionally, there are currently no guidelines regarding API performance, so we have no choice but to verify performance degradation through testing.

   This is hindering proactive API development. Please create clear guidelines that specify the details regarding API performance.

   (In Japanese)
   APIパフォーマンスの向上とAPI利用ガイドラインの作成：

   BoxのAPIを活用する際、1フォルダあたりのコンテンツが膨大だったり、フォルダへの招待数が多い場合、処理速度が大きく低下してしまい、処理が完了するまで多くの時間がかかり不満に思っています。
   より快適でスピーディな処理をAPIで実現したいので、API利用時のパフォーマンス向上をしてほしいです。

   また、現時点ではAPIパフォーマンスに関するガイドラインが存在しないため、検証ベースでパフォーマンス低下の可否を確認するしかありません。
   そのため、積極的なAPI開発の妨げになっています。 APIパフォーマンスに関する仕様を明確にまとめたガイドラインを作成してください。

   When utilizing Box’s API, if the amount of content per folder is enormous or the number of invitations to a folder is high, the processing speed drops significantly. As a result, it takes a long time to complete operations, which is quite frustrating.

   We would like the API to deliver a more comfortable and speedy processing experience, so I hope you will improve the performance when using the API.

   Additionally, there are currently no guidelines regarding API performance, so we have no choice but to verify performance degradation through testing.

   This is hindering proactive API development. Please create clear guidelines… more

   20 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Other  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

8. Support MS Teams Integration on GCCH

   Would like to see Box to able to integrate with Microsoft Teams on a GCH environment without having to sideload Box into the environment by a system integrator to get it to work.

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Partner Integrations  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

9. Simply MFA enablement to provide a simple SINGLE notice to collaborators that MFA was enabled for company "X"

   Enabling MFA for external collaborators caused mass emails to each external collaborator for every folder they are invited to, so a collaborator invited to 100 unique folders would be sent 100 emails, and would in turn click 'accept' in those emails, causing 100 emails to be send back to the content owner that it was accepted. This appears to happen even if the collaborator has already accessed the file (Triggered by enabling MFA).

   Instead of emailing for every instance of an invited collaborator email address on every folder, instead prompt them to setup MFA only when they access a file or folder that requires MFA and only if they have not already setup MFA, or optionally, send only a SINGLE email to an external collaborator indicating that MFA had been enable by a specific company and if they wanted to access any of those files, the would need to setup MFA by accessing their Box account.

   One email, rather than hundreds or thousands.

   Enabling MFA for external collaborators caused mass emails to each external collaborator for every folder they are invited to, so a collaborator invited to 100 unique folders would be sent 100 emails, and would in turn click 'accept' in those emails, causing 100 emails to be send back to the content owner that it was accepted. This appears to happen even if the collaborator has already accessed the file (Triggered by enabling MFA).

   Instead of emailing for every instance of an invited collaborator email address on every folder, instead prompt them to setup MFA only when they access a file… more

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Security  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

10. File Outcome Actions for Form Uploaded Files

    Include the ability to take file actions on files uploaded from a Box Form like you can in Relay. We have several Forms and Relays that not only take text/date/dropdown input but also have file upload fields and were hoping to move them to Automate so that we could take advantage of the additional features, but are unable to since there is no option to use an Outcome to take action upon the uploaded files.

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Box Automate  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

11. Don't cancel Box Sync!

    I have used Box Sync for many years, and it does exactly what I need it to do, which includes syncing all the files that I keep there and allowing them to download to my computers. Other key features are:

    • on my MAC, I can search the files on the entire Mac INCLUDING the Box Sync files

    • I want to have ALL the Box Sync files downloaded on both my computers.

    Apparently neither of these is possible with Box Drive, which will make it useless for me (and certainly not better, as all the emails claim).

    KEEP BOX SYNC!

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Box Sync  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

12. Setting to allow classification additions/increases but not deletions/decreases

    Box Shields allows you to disable classification modifications for everyone except admins, but this is too restrictive. What we're looking for:

    • Allow classification labels to be ranked by sensitivity
    • Add configuration setting to allow Editors to add/increase sensitivity but not be able to delete/decrease sensitivity.

    Without this, we're finding we have to choose between diffusing accountability of classification labels vs. administrative overhead of having an admin or owner manage all classification label additions.

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Shield  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

13. Naming the photos

    I have a problem. Box app names the photos with ":" marks on the time stamp and my desktop app doesn't want to download the photos with ":" -markers. This is a bad bug. I didn't find any setting to adjust the structure of the photofiles name.

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Box Apps  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

14. Section to know who our buisness subscription contact is

    Could there be a section within our account that shows our current point of contact (e.g. Account Manager)?

    Our point of contact appears to change frequently, and we are often contacted by different people with various roles. It can be difficult to keep track of who we should contact when we need assistance.

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Other  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

15. Implementation of Windows standard shortcut keys. Windows標準ショートカットキーの実装

    Please make it possible to use standard Windows shortcut keys in Box as much as possible.
    In particular, the following shortcuts do not work, which makes everyday tasks inconvenient.

    ・F2: Rename
    ・Delete: Delete
    ・Shift+Delete: Permanently delete
    ・Ctrl+Shift+N: Create new folder
    ・Alt+↑: Go up one folder
    ・Alt+→ / Alt+←: Forward / Back (Please function as a history of folder navigation within the Box tab, rather than the browser's general history)

    By implementing standard Windows shortcut keys, users can perform file operations quickly with the keyboard, which will improve work efficiency.

    Box上で、Windows標準のショートカットキーをできる限り利用できるようにしてください。
    特に、以下のショートカットが使用できず、日常的な操作において不便を感じています。

    ・F2：名称変更
    ・Delete：削除
    ・Shift＋Delete：完全削除
    ・Ctrl＋Shift＋N：新規フォルダ作成
    ・Alt＋↑：上のフォルダへ移動
    ・Alt＋→ / Alt＋←：進む / 戻る（ブラウザ全体の履歴ではなく、Boxタブ内でのフォルダ遷移の履歴として動作してほしい）

    Windows標準のショートカットキーの実装により、キーボードによる高速なファイル操作が可能となり、作業効率の向上につながります。

    Please make it possible to use standard Windows shortcut keys in Box as much as possible.
    In particular, the following shortcuts do not work, which makes everyday tasks inconvenient.

    ・F2: Rename
    ・Delete: Delete
    ・Shift+Delete: Permanently delete
    ・Ctrl+Shift+N: Create new folder
    ・Alt+↑: Go up one folder
    ・Alt+→ / Alt+←: Forward / Back (Please function as a history of folder navigation within the Box tab, rather than the browser's general history)

    By implementing standard Windows shortcut keys, users can perform file operations quickly with the keyboard, which will improve work efficiency.

    Box上で、Windows標準のショートカットキーをできる限り利用できるようにしてください。
    特に、以下のショートカットが使用できず、日常的な操作において不便を感じています。

    ・F2：名称変更
    ・Delete：削除
    ・Shift＋Delete：完全削除
    ・Ctrl＋Shift＋N：新規フォルダ作成
    ・Alt＋↑：上のフォルダへ移動
    ・Alt＋→ / Alt＋←：進む… more

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Other  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

16. Implementation of the “Keep me signed in” and “Resume from the last viewed screen” features in Personal Settings

    Please keep user sessions active for a certain time even after the browser is closed.
    Specifically, we would like users to be able to resume their work from the folder or screen that was open the last time they accessed Box, rather than from the home screen.
    Please also allow users to select and change these options in their personal settings.
    Currently, the session ends every time the browser is closed, requiring users to start from the login screen each time, which results in time loss, especially when working within deep folder hierarchies.

    ＜個人設定の中に、「セッションの保持」と「最後に表示した画面から再開する」機能の実装＞
    ブラウザを閉じた後でも、一定時間はユーザーセッションを維持してください。
    具体的には、ホーム画面ではなく、ユーザーが最後にBoxにアクセスしたときに開いていたフォルダまたは画面から作業を再開できるようにしてください。
    また、ユーザーが個人設定で選択・変更できるようにしてください。
    現在は、ブラウザを閉じるたびにセッションが終了し、ユーザーは毎回ログイン後の画面から操作を開始する必要があるため、特に深いフォルダ階層で作業する場合に時間のロスにつながっています。

    Please keep user sessions active for a certain time even after the browser is closed.
    Specifically, we would like users to be able to resume their work from the folder or screen that was open the last time they accessed Box, rather than from the home screen.
    Please also allow users to select and change these options in their personal settings.
    Currently, the session ends every time the browser is closed, requiring users to start from the login screen each time, which results in time loss, especially when working within deep folder hierarchies.

    ＜個人設定の中に、「セッションの保持」と「最後に表示した画面から再開する」機能の実装＞
    ブラウザを閉じた後でも、一定時間はユーザーセッションを維持してください。
    具体的には、ホーム画面ではなく、ユーザーが最後にBoxにアクセスしたときに開いていたフォルダまたは画面から作業を再開できるようにしてください。
    また、ユーザーが個人設定で選択・変更できるようにしてください。… more

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Other  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

17. Pause upload/download on Box Drive

    PLEASE. PLEASE. PLEASE. I cannot describe how much this is important to me. I work on several projects that use many files simultaneously. Some of these files are large. Being unable to pause an upload/sync makes my workflow so incredibly slower.

    Current life: I make some edit to a large file, my entire workflow is interrupted as said large file needs to be entirely uploaded before I can retrieve literally anything else from Box. This last part is not even Box's problem, but I have a pretty decent computer and slows down significantly during large uploads, which affects the rest of my work too. Even writing this request was a little slow.

    Now, IMAGINE this wonderful little scenario: I click on the Box icon. I hit pause sync or whatever you may want to call it. I do whatever edit I want. Then, at the end of the workday, I hit resume sync.

    Now IMAGINE this even better scenario for someone like me: oops, I forgot to hit the pause button before I started working. NO PROBLEM! I can pause/cancel this particular upload as it is happening.

    PROBLEM SOLVED!

    Thank you Box team!

    PLEASE. PLEASE. PLEASE. I cannot describe how much this is important to me. I work on several projects that use many files simultaneously. Some of these files are large. Being unable to pause an upload/sync makes my workflow so incredibly slower.

    Current life: I make some edit to a large file, my entire workflow is interrupted as said large file needs to be entirely uploaded before I can retrieve literally anything else from Box. This last part is not even Box's problem, but I have a pretty decent computer and slows down significantly during large uploads, which affects the rest… more

    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Box Drive  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

18. Box AI on metadata

    Ability to leverage AI on metadata of a file/folder, document properties - not just the content of the file

    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Box AI  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

19. I want to reuse the content entered in File Request as a task message

    We are running tasks in a Relay workflow, triggered by uploads via File Request.

    In Box’s current specifications, the “file description” entered by users in the File Request form is saved in the file’s description field in its properties after upload.

    However, when the Relay workflow starts, the message sent to the task assignee is the one configured in Relay. This message is recorded under the file’s “Activity,” but we also need to check the description field in the file properties, which means switching views and creates extra work.

    If there were a feature that allowed us to set the content entered in the File Request as the Relay task message, we would be able to use that instead of the current operational workaround.

    ---

    ファイルリクエストからのアップロードをトリガーにRelayワークフローでタスクを動かしています。
    現状Boxの仕様では、ファイルリクエストフォームでユーザーが入力した「ファイルの説明」はアップロード後、ファイルのプロパティの説明欄に保存されます。
    しかし、Relayワークフローがスタートした時、タスク担当者に送信されるのはRelayで設定したメッセージです。このメッセージはファイルの「アクティビティ」に残りますが、ファイルのプロパティの説明欄も確認する必要があり、切り替えが手間となっています。

    ファイルリクエストで入力した内容をタスクメッセージに転用できるようする機能実装をしてほしいです。

    We are running tasks in a Relay workflow, triggered by uploads via File Request.

    In Box’s current specifications, the “file description” entered by users in the File Request form is saved in the file’s description field in its properties after upload.

    However, when the Relay workflow starts, the message sent to the task assignee is the one configured in Relay. This message is recorded under the file’s “Activity,” but we also need to check the description field in the file properties, which means switching views and creates extra work.

    If there were a feature that allowed us to set… more

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Workflow  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

20. Box Drive performance is terrible

    I have had a personal Box subscription for about 20 years and used Box Sync on multiple devices (PC, Mac, Mobile) with barely a hiccup in all that time. Rock solid and reliable. For the past few years I have had my Cursor/VS Code project folders stored in Box and synced along with lots of other general document files and everything just worked with minimal noticeable lag. So I didn't think twice about installing Box Drive to take over from Box Sync.

    Wow, what a disappointment. Before I could just tag a folder to "Sync" and know it would be available locally in full on all my devices. No issues, fairly instant sync. Now, I have to "Make available offline" if I actually want a folder to sync, but even then it doesn't work well. IF I can even see the accurate sync status of a folder or file the only thing I can count on is that it could be DAYS before even small changes fully sync. Or never.

    Mind you I am mostly running on two fully OS updated Apple silicon Macs (M1 Max and M5 Pro Macbook Pros), on Gigabit speed Verizon FIOS connections, so there is NO excuse for a 5 second sync delay on a few updated html or js files, let alone 5 DAYS. I'm simply trying to move a few files between two powerful Macs and the changes I've made on one are simply not uploading, so the otherMac doesn't even know it's behind. Force Quitting Box and relaunching seems to get things moving again but how did this thing pass QA in such a glitchy state?

    For the first time in 20 years I am seriously considering dropping Box, and can no longer recommend it to clients who might be frustrated by their experience with Google Drive or OneDrive. Not sure what's going on over there but I expect better from Box.

    I have had a personal Box subscription for about 20 years and used Box Sync on multiple devices (PC, Mac, Mobile) with barely a hiccup in all that time. Rock solid and reliable. For the past few years I have had my Cursor/VS Code project folders stored in Box and synced along with lots of other general document files and everything just worked with minimal noticeable lag. So I didn't think twice about installing Box Drive to take over from Box Sync.

    Wow, what a disappointment. Before I could just tag a folder to "Sync" and know it would be… more

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Box Drive  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating